NYT is pissed. Trump appointee will remain Judge in documents case. I say it's part of the plan.
(dnyuz.com)
- N C S W I C -
Comments (20)
sorted by:
get fucked NYT
Well if all prosecutors and judges are apolitical and neutral, it shouldn’t matter one iota.
Unless the Times has a vested interest in the outcome....
Judge Aileen M. Cannon
Cannon go boom! hahahaha. I'll show myself out now.
Witty, you are!
And don't let the door hit ya' where the good Lord split ya'!!!!!! Just sayin'!!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
hahahaha that's right!
I find it hilarious that her random selection “draws questions” whether something fishy was up in her getting the case.
But when the majority of other cases “randomly” get a liberal hack that completely refuses to follow the rule of law, no one bats an eye
Exactly
Is it tried both in FL and DC? I thought the case was in DC. This would be great news if it is only tried in FL.
It's only in FL from what I've heard.
I believe there is one in DC and one in FL. One federal and one state. To set precedent.
Ugh. Thanks.
"Hoarding"? You mean like stacked in his garage next to his corvette?
If she stays judge, its because shes bought or was a mole. I can garantee nothing would have gone forward without first garanteeing this, they arent on their first steps.
It’s so funny the level of hypocrisy that they can’t even recognize it
Just to play devils advocate… isn’t this exactly what we get mad about when this is the case for dems?
Where in the article did they appear to be "pissed"? If anything they seemed to explain why AC was so likely to receive the case, i.e. that it's not a simple one in ten chance like some might have believed.
you are coping
coping and seething
you just can’t accept what you’re seeing
you are coping
coping and seething
the truth it is scalding and now you are malding