Latest AA tweet
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (14)
sorted by:
And All the comments are about stock details I don't understand. Twitter is a weird place.
It seems like AMC is showing the movie pretty normally just there are a few theaters that had some issues.
AMC is one of the heavily shorted stocks.
MSM will do or say anything to help out the short sellers.
I always thought that cinemas were part of the plan.
Me, too! 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
No it is not. AMCX was the heavily shorted stock. Along with with likes of Robinhood they instead took away the buy button on AMC and NOT AMCX. The MSM then pumped AMC instead. As much as I dislike AA, I give him credit for even saying on twitter that he never saw evidence of 'naked shorts'. If you read the SEC report from the January 28th incident you can clearly see it was about about 30% or so short (still high) but that was before the dilution. "Conspiracy Theory"
I've never been a fan of the stock,but the number of shorts is unknown...... I don't own any, and I don't recommend anyone to buy.
But it is considered to be short,by a large number of people, and that's the point for this disscution.
https://twitter.com/jimcramer/status/1398054622451863553?t=1lpfJLzyEE_0NV-DoDgMFA&s=19
I remember when he was pumping AMC, told me all I needed to know.......
Yep
The SoF may actually save some theaters.
I dont get what he is trying to say. Not sure if I'm missing sarcasm or not.
It's like hes trashing "conspiracy" theorists but then maybe praising or maybe WTF'ing the number of people who have seeing it, but then making a statement about how someone is falsely calming something about the viewing numbers without quantifying if it is more or less than the claimed amount?
It's a bizzare word salad that you can interpret either way due to the glaring omission of details.
"I did the things with the stuff and it turned out as expected even though people say otherwise." Like, what would anyone get from a statement like that?
Can someone in the know fill in the missing information provide some clarity because I cant figure it out. - Thanks.
He's just using their tactics against them, calling them conspiracy theorists.
I don't think he actually means this as a sleight against real conspiracy theorists.
More like a "see I can do this too"
https://twitter.com/CEOAdam/status/1679212647772995586?s=20
He's getting dopamine hits from the likely short lived (D)rama. So he's salad shooting for attention.