Top Climate Scientists Blow Whistle, Expose ‘Cover-Up’
(newsaddicts.com)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
Top climate scientists have blown the whistle to reveal that they were “ordered” to “cover up” the truth about the alleged “global warming” on Earth.
For the past six years, the United Nations (UN) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has been diligently compiling an authoritative report on the full extent of man-made global warming.
And according to a leak, it apparently shows that global temperatures haven’t increased in 15 years.
The hundreds of esteemed scientists who worked on the report confirmed that 1998 is still the hottest year on record.
Ever since that time, temperatures have either generally remained the same or declined, blowing major holes in the government’s global warming narrative.
Politicians who obtained a leaked copy of the report are now trying to cover up the fact that, based on its findings, man-made climate change is a hoax.
And once the truth gets out, everything governments are doing to go “green” will also be exposed as nothing more than a power grab.
The Associated Press (AP) obtained leaked documents about the matter showing that the political establishment all across the Western world is freaking out about the report’s findings.
Some are even calling for portions of the report to be redacted or deleted so the truth remains hidden.
Were the world to find out that global warming and climate change are a hoax, it could lead to a massive revolt against the government for being “misleading” about the state of the planet.
50% (or more) of all agricultural gains since the industrial revolution is BECAUSE of increased atmospheric CO2. Most people attribute ALL of these gains with increased technology, but the greatest single contributor to agricultural gains since 1800 (during which time we have invented chemical fertilizers, pesticides and mechanized agriculture) is the increase in atmospheric CO2.
Doubling atmospheric CO2 is the equivalent of doubling rainfall in plants in semi-arid/arid regions as the increased CO2 allows photosynthesis to require HALF the water to be transpired from the plant.
At around ~250 ppm atmospheric CO2 (We are currently at ~420 ppm atmospheric CO2) agriculture becomes nearly IMPOSSIBLE. Which aligns with when the agricultural revolution began in the historical record (about 12,000 to 8,000 BCE).
The positive growth affects of CO2 are GREATER in trees than in grasses. Increases of atmospheric CO2 increase frost tolerance of plants.
Increased atmospheric CO2 makes plants more drought tolerant.
Increased atmospheric CO2 greens the world, making agriculture more bountiful.
Not to mention they are falsely accusing us of causing the demise of the planet.
sticky copy here
https://communities.win/c/ClimateChange/p/16bivzDCHX/
Thank you.
Since 1900, the warmest year was 1936. "Researchers" like to cherry-pick their x-axis timeline...
Anybody have the sauce? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2425775/Climate-scientists-told-cover-fact-Earths-temperature-risen-15-years.html
It seems as more of the underlings are beginning to see that the cabal's ability to retaliate against them for coming forth with the truth is dying. I think the weaker the cabal gets the more those that had been forced to help them under duress will be coming forward with their information.
From the article:
Rajendra Pachauri, who was then the chairman of the UN's IPCC, had close connections with the people behind the Indian TATA company. Pachauri was also the chairman of TERI which was originally called the TATA Energy Research institute.
Entirely coincidentally, the scientist who predicted that the Himalayas were going to melt landed a good job with TATA shortly afterwards.
All the IPCC assessment reports have been a con. They put together the main document using hand-picked scientists who use it to promote their own papers and, of course, they all toe the line regarding the narrative.
After that report has been compiled they make a Summary for Policy Makers report from it. That is done by politicians rather than scientists and that paper is debriefed to the media several days before the main report comes out. That enables the media to present the "right" headlines before any of the details can be checked in the main report.
Plus 1 for “toe the line”. Plus plus for brief, concise and to the point. Very well written.
Thank you, I do try! However, I tend to write the same way that I speak so not always good.
I remember when Gore started this crap. He claimed global warming but all scientists claimed a very slow global cooling. So to confuse people the term was changed to climate change, so you really dont know if you are supporting warming or cooling.
The reason politicians go with global warming is that they can put carbon taxes on everyone and everything. They all talk about saving the planet but no one talks about saving the people.
The switch to the term "climate change" meant that they could attribute ANY unusual weather event (even if really not that unusual) to "climate change". I'm not sure whether I am angrier at the people trying to use "climate change" to further their agenda, or the people who fall for it!
Yes. When someone comments on climate change I ask them if they are referring to warming or cooling and watch them walking away.
Same here. They changed the name so they could adjust the lie easier.
Ask Al Gore how much Soros paid him to care about the weather ?
Look at all the big homes they have and ask them what was the carbon signature. Then ask all their private flights.
I also remember when Al Gore targeted the children with the claim they are smarter then their parents.
This will probably be useful for when the WEF try to use "climate change" to push for their radical rules on the world's governments.
You don't say!