INTRODUCTION
California Governor G Newsom wants to fine a school board for NOT using corrupted text materials that praise pedo predator Harvey Mil.
Question: How can a governor or other government body issue a fine against someone or something for simply breaking their rules?
For violating 'law'. "Legal violation". Once you understand that much of statute law aka 'civil' law, aka maritime law (contract law) is actually in violation of common law aka the law of the land, you begin to see the true evil mechanisms of the system of systems.
ONE
Common Law vs Contract Law
Common law is innate, God given. However, contract law requires agreement, consent.
Under common law, a crime can only exist when someone has suffered loss or damage. If no one suffers loss or damage, there is no crime.
Under contract law, however, a 'crime' or violation simply exists when one or more parties contravene the requirements or rules of the contract.
The 'legal' system has been infiltrated over decades and centuries, so that governments can 'legally' lay down rules that they then attempt to force citizens aka people to comply with. They can only do so via contract law, aka statute law.
How can they do this? It starts with requiring everyone to 'register' their children at birth. When you are registered, that registration creates a 'legal' entity in your name. Your birth certificate becomes the registration of the living you in the corporate - legal - civil system. It is on that basis that they exert control over you. By registering, and accepting that registration as 'you', you are seen as having given consent to be treated as a legal entity.
Why? Because a corporation itself is a purely 'legal' entity. It is essentially dead. It is not living. It only exists on paper, legally, and a non-living entity like a corporation cannot contract with a living entity.
But you are not your legal identity. You are a living man or woman. Burn your birth certificate, and you are still alive. You exist, and your rights as a living man or woman exist with you. But in order to exert control (corruptly, unlawfully), the governments establish 'statute law', aka rules that they then require you to comply with, and then they use force against your legal entity to make you do it if you do not comply. Taxation. Rules and regulations. Etc.
TWO
Contract Law Must be Subservient to Common Law
Statute law is meant to be subject to Common Law. Why? Because common law, the law of the land, is based on and reflects God's law, aka innate natural law.
Common law was developed and manifested via courts - places where living men and women could challenge each other for damages or loss, and where the results are judged by juries of their peers - other living men and women.
However, courts today mostly operate in the hidden and secret world of the 'legal system', where language is specialized, where lawyers and jurists (judges, etc) are an elite class, and where statute law rules the day.
Statute law - the law that legislatures draft and pass - is law enacted by governments (not courts) to lay down laws for corporate entities and interactions between legal entities. No statute law should violate common law. In other words, no statute law should violate the innate rights of living men and women.
The Founding Fathers understood this, and created the Constitution on the basis of common law existing up to that date, in order to curb and control government. The constitution is all about what the government CANNOT do, and what it can do within a prescribed limit. The Founders of the United States recognized that government had to be limited, because innate law, and innate rights, and living men and women, are correctly superior to government. Government should ONLY exist by the consent of the governed.
But corruption always seeks to infiltrate. It infiltrates through the cracks. It infiltrates in the dark, in secret, gradually increasing its own power and control. So, over time, the system of birth registrations arose, the system of the 'legal' world, and the systems of governments that allow them to dictate to living men and women what they must and must not do, via treating them as purely legal entities, not as living beings.
It's via this method that they reverse the correct order of justice and the order of creation, wherein the creator can never come below the created.
THREE
The Natural Order
The natural order is this: God > living man, living woman > government > corporation (non-living entities).
God creates living men and women, who then create governments as instruments for serving certain requirements of the living men and women, and governments then create corporate entities via 'legal' means.
The corrupting powers reverse this: corporations > government > living men and woman > (x) God
They put corporations on top (NGOs like WEF are corporations), which then exert control over governments, which then exert control over living men and women, in an effort to exert control over God and push God out of the equation altogether.
Today, much of the core influence of the Cabal is now exerted via 'money'. They use fiat 'money' aka 'corporate' money, instead of real money (gold, silver, etc, natural substances). This is another reason why "Gold Destroys FED".
In the modern era, governments are supposed to be created by living men and women to set rules for the interactions (aka 'contracts') between non-living entities like corporations, businesses, etc. Originally, the United States government was created with that vision.
But our living rights come from God, not from a government. They are innate, and since the 1200's in England, laws were developed on the premise that they MUST reflect God's law, aka innate natural law. This is common law, law that manifests via courts as venues for interactions between living men and women.
FOUR
Control Via Legal Means
Much of statute law is now created by governments not based on common law aka innate law, but based on maritime law aka contractual law.
So if you 'speed' in your car, they can fine you even is no one is even hurt. If you smoke this substance, they can fine or imprison you. Violate their rules, and they hunt you down.
All victimless crimes are only crimes because governments (the state) say they are crimes, and living people don't know that the difference.
Part of this entire system runs and functions because at birth, governments 'require' people to 'register' their children whereupon the child is replicated as a legal entity, and it’s this 'legal entity' that is targeted and controlled via statute law our entire lives.
But whether a living man or woman is registered with a government or not, they still exist, they are still alive, and as such they still have inviolable innate rights.
This is the REAL crux of the Great Awakening. The legal system of government is the core mechanism of enslavement. Where government is meant to serve, it is corrupted and used to control and enslage. The ideal vision of this evil is government (the State) controlling living people, enslaved using 'legal' means. The ultimate utopia of this evil system is the NWO, the ultra-government, controlled by the wealthy who exert their control via dead corporations.
The Covid19 "Pandemic" was where they showed themselves to be exactly who the "conspiracy theorists" have been saying they are for years.
FIVE
Legal Does Not Equal Lawful
There is a massive difference between 'legal' and 'lawful'.
Lawful originally means reflecting innate natural law (common law, law that comes from God). Legal means statute law, civil law, law created by governments and non-living entities, which essentially require consent between the parties to that.
Slavery was once legal, but it was never, and never can be, lawful. Slavery violates the innate truth, that all people are created by God with equal value, each one as God's son or daughter.
It's also important to understand that the United States constitution is essentially a codification of all the common law that had been established up until that date. That's where the Bill of Rights comes from. Common Law. Moreover, it was common law that was the basis for the entire premise of the American Revolution and the Declaration of Independence.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident..."
SIX
Understanding Lawful vs Legal is KEY to What Follows The Great Awakening
The War being waged today is both a spiritual war and a material law, and a war between Lawful vs Legal
Which will stand in the superior position, the 'legal' or the 'lawful?
We need the legal. It is necessary to coordinate and serve the people by defining interactions between non-living entities. We need the lawful, because law is the basis of a peaceful, harmonious, just society.
But what is lawful must ALWAYS stand in the upper position over what is legal. Just as living men and women must stand in their rightful position OVER government.
It is the REVERSAL of these positions and the correct order and dynamic that is evil. Why? Because the correct order is the one ordained by the Creator and infused into the fabric of the universe.
Today, evil is attempting to institute a dead, governing control system where all living people are slaves via legal means. This is done by corporate entities (and their money) controlling governments to create statute laws that essentially enslave the people and make them subservient to government.
This is the Swamp that DJT has sworn to obliterate.
The Great Awakening is about the masses of living men and women waking up to the mechanisms by which this evil has been deceiving, manipulating and controlling them over decades, over centuries. But that is the starting point.
SEVEN
What Comes After
The transition is one of moving from being governed by Evil to being self-governing under God (aka innate natural law).
For this, awakening is required. The foundation for the transition was planted with the victory of Christ 2000 years ago, and it has been fermenting, growing ever since. It has evolved centrally in the sphere of Christian civilization through the emergence of common law. In the last few centuries, it has spread to exert a positive influence on all cultures and civilizations worldwide. It's no coincidence that Evil has worked to corrupt that influence.
It's all about the innate rights of living men and women VS. 'privileges' endowed by dead corporate governments on legal entities via legal means. The people of the world are now being called (by God, imo) to wake up to how Evil has controlled the world since time immemorial, via what mechanisms, via what corruptions evil has assailed us with.
The people of the world are being called to wake up to our correct and rightful position as free living men and women under God, with governments under us, not the other way around, and the United States has been the chosen spearhead of this call.
When DJT stated he was transferring the power from Washington DC back the American People, he was in essence stating that he was acting to restore the correct and natural order between dead corporate government and living men and women.
But this is also why the Awakening MUST happen. Living Men and Women can ONLY exert their true authority over the dead corporate entities and contractually run governments WHEN those living men and women understand their true rights and obligations to be responsible and self-governing.
In the absence of living men and women who aware of their rights and the correct role and position of the legally structured non-living world, evil will always fill the vacuum and the servant will attempt to usurp the master's correct position.
So it was in Eden, so it was 2000 years ago, and so it is now.
FURTHER STUDY, INVESTIGATION
Legal vs Lawful
The Magna Carta
Adamic Law vs Angelic Law
Frederic Bastiat - "The Law" (essay)
Christian Foundations of Common Law
'Reversal of natural order' as the foundation and beginning of evil
No, contract law is part of the common law.
The US Constitution even guarantees the right to contract.
Article 1, Section 10:
States add statutory (civil law) over the top of the common law structure, but the common law structure is still there.
What the cabal has done is to use contract law in a deceptive and hidden way.
For example, you sign a contract (whether you know it or not) as a condition of obtaining a "driver's license."
You have no idea what that contract says or obligates you to do or not do, because that is not disclosed to you.
This makes it a voidable contract, by common law, but nobody knows that.
It also does not disclose to you when the "driver's license" is required and when it is not.
Like a real estate contract, ONLY that which is in writing matters.
They can lie to you all they want, because their verbal claims mean nothing. It is ONLY what is in the contract that matters -- and you have no idea what that is.
Corporations are creatures of the state. You enter into an agreement WITH THE STATE to create a corporation. By doing so, you agree to FOLLOW THE STATE'S RULES regarding that corporation.
Again, you have a common law RIGHT to enter into that contract. But the problem is that the state does not tell you all the rules -- some of which might be made up as they go -- which means it is not a valid contract, per common law (because there is no real "meeting of the minds," which is a common law principle for a valid contract, and one that all civil law courts recognize because it is so obvious; they hide it though, when the government is the one committing the fraud).
Before corporations, businesses were either sole proprietorships, partnerships, or the sophisticated businessman created a business trust (also known as common law trust).
Standard Oil Company, originally founded in the 1890's, was a business trust, not a corporation (which were not in common use back then). Due to Rockfeller's attempts at monopoly, we get such terms as "trust busting" and "anti-trust" laws which were aimed at breaking up the monopoly power of the Standard Oil buiness trust. That's how business was done back then.
All 3 central banks in the United States (Bank of the United States, Second Bank of the United States, and the Federal Reserve Bank) were created as business trusts.
Such trusts would usually have a fixed term of 20 years before they would expire.
This was due to the common law trust principles developed in Engand, going back 500 years.
The Bank of the United States was the first central bank, established in 1791. It was a trust (business trust, or common law trust, or what the US Supreme Court has called a pure trust).
As such, it MUST have an expiration date, which could not exceed "21 years after lives in being," which was an English common law principle of trusts.
As a practical matter, they would make it a nice, round 20 years.
Which means, it would expire in 1811.
THIS was the real reason for the War of 1812. The US Congress was not going to renew the central bank, and England's power structure (Rothschilds, etc.) wanted the central bank in America, like the one they controlled in England.
Although the US won that war, the central banking crowd still got what they really wanted by creating the Second Bank of the United States, in 1816.
That, too, was a business trust which would expire in 20 years. But President Andrew Jackson was in office, and he was opposed to renewal. The bankers tried to assasinate him to get what they wanted.
But, they failed. I believe this is why he is on the $20 bill. It is their "fuck you" to Jackson. Because although he won the day, and central banking ceased to exist in 1836, it would rear its ugly head again in 1913.
From 1836 to 1913, WITHOUT a central bank, America experienced the greatest period of economic expansion and prosperity in the history of the world.
The Federal Reserve Bank was created in 1913, and it too was a business trust -- orginally.
It would expire in 1933, the year they confiscated gold.
But this time, the central bankers were prepared. They had developed the civil law for corporations from around 1900 until the 1920's.
In 1927, the Federal Reserve Bank business trust converted from a business trust to a corporation. The reason: corporations have perpetual life, and never expire. They no longer needed congressional approval (or oversight) to be renewed every 20 years.
THIS is what gave them their ultimate power.
Corporations are a good thing, overall. They were originally created by the king (once again!) to limit liability of investors.
This is a NECESSARY component in a strong, economic system. Today, it is abused. But the concept is a good one, at least in theory.
The king would create a special charteer for a corporation. Any investor would be able to contribute money, but if anything went wrong (the ship sinks, for example), nobody could sue the investor (or the king!). They could only sue the corporation, which might or might have have any assets left.
The corporation has taken over for the buisness trust. The business trust still exists, but so few people understand it -- especially attorneys and bankers -- that it is rarely used as a practical matter.
Before corporations, the trustees had liability for the wrongful acts of a business owned by the trust. Today, neither the shareholders, directors, nor officers of a corporation are held accountable for wrongful acts -- even if it is outright criminal in nature.
That is where it has gone off the rails. A corporation should not be able to shield the individual for CRIMINAL acts. Investment ideas that don't work out and lose money? Ok. That's one thing. But outright fraud or other criminal acts (such as these vaccine companies) should be prosecuted against the individuals who committed the crimes.
No, that is not correct, but ...
Yes, that is correct. But this is due to the liability shield that the government grants to the individuals who work for the corporation, but commit crimes.
This can be changed by the legislature, excpet that they are bought and paid for by these very people who like getting away with their crimes.
Thank you very much for all the information and the comprehensive correction.
^ BTW ...
This point actually brings up an crucial concept regarding the income tax.
If you ask an average attorney about the consitutional validity of the income tax, they will say that the Supreme Court ruled that the income tax IS constitutional.
And that is a true statement. But most attorneys have NO CLUE why or on what basis.
The case is from 1916, called Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad.
Frank Brushaber owned stock in the Union Pacific Railroad, a corporation.
He received dividends, and challenged the new (1913) tax law on that issue.
The MISSING KEY:
The Union Pacific Railroad WAS in fact established for the expansion of the railroads.
BUT ...
It was a SPECIALLY CHARTERED ... CORPORATION ... CREATED BY CONGRESS.
It was NOT a corporation created in one of the 50 States. It was a CREATURE of CONGRESS.
This made it a "federal privilege" in law.
And THIS is WHY the SCOTUS ruled that taxing the proceeds from this federal privilege WAS taxable and constitutional.
Think of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. These are (a) corporations that (b) buy mortgages, AND (c) WERE CREATED BY CONGRESS.
This gives them a special status, just like the Union Pacific Railroad was back then.
For more info on this, and what the federal income tax is ACTUALLY for, read Pete Hendrickson's book about the income tax.
If you see the federal income tax (and the other federal taxes) as protection money paid to a gang, you'll have a better time.
The federal government has, long ago, exceeded the limits of the constitution. Expecting it to keep itself within the limits is a pointless endeavor, unless you have a lot of guns and men willing to shoot those guns on your behalf.
Wonder if that's why they're all lawyers.
Even stupid Hunter Biden:
https://www.grassley.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/fd_1023_obtained_by_senator_grassley_-_biden.pdf
That is EXACTLY the reason they are.
Although ... I'm sure Hunter was on the board because of who his daddy is, and nothing to do with him going to Yale Law School or anything else.