At in-laws - they get the paper so I browsed through it. And I learned some things.
“Niger Coup Foils US Strategy. Opens door for Russia in Africa” Now I know coup was deep state loss
Joan Dangerfield cannot sell her LA mansion. Others having trouble also selling their larger mansions. People want it but with owner financing. No CIA to buy them?
“David Rockefeller’s Longtime New York City Townhouse Lists” I read this one and unexpectedly found that it is being sold by Doug Band, long time advisor to Bill Clinton and who also founded Teneo Holdings. He also helped spearhead the Clinton Global Initiative. More selling of assets per Trump EO?
“Regulators propose expanding safety net for banks” “Banks broadly criticized the plan”… another deep state loss
So while it may not be fun to read MSM, there are clues to be found!
Can you explain this one?
Just a guess: Wasn't there a Trump Executive Order that says they can confiscate your property if you have are found to have been involved in human trafficking?
...or any other nefarious activity
couple of points on that.
If the government was confiscating the property, the headline would be
David Rockefeller’s Longtime New York City Townhouse Confiscated!
This seems like a private sale....and one likely to generate fees for Doug Band!!
When Paul Manafort had his property confiscated there were stories like this https://ny.curbed.com/2018/9/14/17861532/paul-manafort-plea-deal-new-york-real-estate
My brother lived near one of these which is how i remembered this example.
The second and bigger issue is a lot of people have misunderstood that executive order.
I believe you are refer to EO 13818, Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/12/26/2017-27925/blocking-the-property-of-persons-involved-in-serious-human-rights-abuse-or-corruption
As for point 1, the way it was explained to me is that "serious human rights abuse" has a very specific meaning in US law and it doesn't include trafficking as it was defined decades before human trafficking became a prominent concern.
As for point 2, the executive order is the implementation of The Global Magnitsky Act, a law passed in 2016. This law sanctions people by seizing their US based assets and preventing them from using US banks. It uses sanctions and not jail time, because these people are beyond US law and can't be arrested, so it doesn't apply to Americans.
There's a way of proving my two points. One is, executive order 13818 requires a report every year on who got sanctioned. It's always foreigners. And the Treasury department lets you look up who is sanctioned because a bank or real estate company or other financial institutions have to have a way of following the "Know Your Customer" rules in anti-money laundering laws. If someone wants to deposit $10 million in cash in your bank? Or buy several properties from you for $10 million in cash, how do you know this isn't drug money or money from a terrorist group etc. How do you know who is sanctioned and who isn't?
This march the 2022 report was released
You can look up sanctioned people here. It's pretty simple, to find people sanctioned under EO 13818, you select the program designation. In this case it's GLOMAG for Global Magnitsky Act. https://sanctionssearch.ofac.treas.gov/
A quick stroll of the search results reveals almost all foreign addresses. If you filter by United States you can 3 entries.
This is a Liberian Government official. SHERMAN, Harry Varney Gboto-Nambi
11803 Backus Drive Individual GLOMAG
These are US companies owned by the former President of Paraguay. TABACOS USA INC. 4500 William Penn Highway Entity GLOMAG
BEBIDAS USA INC. 4500 William Penn Highway Entity GLOMAG
So I'm pretty sure this executive order doesn't do what people are claiming it does.
I think that is the point. They are getting rid before it can be confiscated.
Doug Band, who owns the house, (David Rockefeller died a few years ago at 101 years old.) is an American. He is not subject this this executive order.
If his assets were to confiscated, that would include the proceeds from this sale.
So I don't an openly advertised sale of his house is a way to hide assets.
It depends what you do with those assets after the sale.
Hi,
where is this from?
It seems to be from a different executive order.
Oh, actually in turns up in a ton of different Executive orders.....It's section 9 in this EO on Ukraine. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-13818-blocking-the-property-persons-involved-serious-human-rights-abuse-or
It's in this one from 2011, section 7 https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/29/executive-order-13572-blocking-property-certain-persons-respect-human-ri
So this seems to be the standard language for seizing assets of foreigners.
Because there's two parts to the beginning of that sentence. and you highlighted one of them.
First part is the for the people affected -- For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order
Second part is their property in the US -- who might have a constitutional presence in the United States.
It basically says, if you are affected by this, we will seize your US based property/assets.
But the executive order 13818 is the implementation of the law passed by Congress, the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act and this defines who is subject to these sanctions.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/284/text
The law is very clear it refers only to foreign persons and it says it right up front.
In the first part that deals with sanctions makes it clear the law is giving the president the ability to act against "foreign persons."
So this law and this executive order clearly does not apply to Americans.
They spell this out clearly.
yes
More than a 100 celebrity homes sold/put up for sale in last year alone, good luck finding a single buyer or any paperwork on any sale...........
Agreed that it's critical to read mainstream news. Knowing their motivations and symbology we can browse it for cabal comms and status reports just like OP has done here.
Doug Band? Wasn’t he one of those in the Q post with the picture of Clinton and his minions with the North Koreans, standing in front of that mural?
Edit: Q-Posts #227 and #849
https://qalerts.app/?q=%23227
.
https://qalerts.app/?q=%23849
You are dedicated, I really respect that, thanks fren
Did the bird put up a good fight when you wrestled his cage liner away from him?