I dunno. There are doctors who purport that the entire model of virology is a sham, that the scientific method was not applied to it... that we have never EVER isolated or witnessed any actual "virus" of any kind. From the beginning, viruses were "detected" not based on finding a virus, but by observing the damaging cellular effects of the supposed virus on healthy tissue. The claim by virology debunkers is that in the preparation for the testing healthy tissue, they poison the healthy tissue (with chemicals and antibiotics) and the negative effects of the virus are present in this tissue whether or not any "infected tissue" is mixed in with the healthy tissue! Many have made the case that smallpox and many other dis-eases disappeared not because of vaccination, but because of improved sanitation and hygiene (clean water, etc). I dunno. One thing I don't believe is pretty much anything that is presented to me. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't.
I have seen old charts, posted on a couple of threads on GAW, that showed how most diseases were dropping in relation to sanitation and clean water. Those same diseases took an upward surge when vaccines for said dieases were introduced. I have no idea how to find those threads, though.
I have those images on my local drive. I would post them right here in the reply but for some reason I can't see how to upload an image in a post. Frankly makes me feel like I'm being censored. Do I have to upload it to some image hosting site first and then link to it from here? That's already too much work -- the site should manage that for me so I don't have to think about it.
I dunno. There are doctors who purport that the entire model of virology is a sham, that the scientific method was not applied to it... that we have never EVER isolated or witnessed any actual "virus" of any kind. From the beginning, viruses were "detected" not based on finding a virus, but by observing the damaging cellular effects of the supposed virus on healthy tissue. The claim by virology debunkers is that in the preparation for the testing healthy tissue, they poison the healthy tissue (with chemicals and antibiotics) and the negative effects of the virus are present in this tissue whether or not any "infected tissue" is mixed in with the healthy tissue! Many have made the case that smallpox and many other dis-eases disappeared not because of vaccination, but because of improved sanitation and hygiene (clean water, etc). I dunno. One thing I don't believe is pretty much anything that is presented to me. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't.
I have seen old charts, posted on a couple of threads on GAW, that showed how most diseases were dropping in relation to sanitation and clean water. Those same diseases took an upward surge when vaccines for said dieases were introduced. I have no idea how to find those threads, though.
I have those images on my local drive. I would post them right here in the reply but for some reason I can't see how to upload an image in a post. Frankly makes me feel like I'm being censored. Do I have to upload it to some image hosting site first and then link to it from here? That's already too much work -- the site should manage that for me so I don't have to think about it.
Right you are. There are no control experiments in virology, hence it cannot be following the scientific method making it a pseudoscience.