Note - I am not a lawyer. Someone who is needs to weigh in also...
The other night I posted a reply to someone about Trump's $200,000 bail he will have in the GA case. I couldn't understand why he would even need bail since he is surrounded by federal agents at all times - he ain't going anywhere. Then I heard about the terms of the bail... Number 4(e) specifically worries me.
(4) The Defendant shall perform no act to intimidate any person known to him or her to be a codefendant or witness in this case or to otherwise obstruct the administration of justice. Id. This shall include, but is not limited to, the following:
a. The Defendant shall make no direct or indirect threat of any nature against any codefendant;
b. The Defendant shall make no direct or indirect threat of any nature against any witness including, but not limited to, the individuals designated in the Indictment as an unindicated co-conspirators Individual 1 through Individual 30;
c. The Defendant shall make no direct or indirect threat of any nature against any victim;
d. The Defendant shall make no direct or indirect threat of any nature against the community or to any property in the community;
e. **The above shall include, but are not limited to, posts on social media or reposts of posts made by another individual on social media; **
The terms are wide open with the "but is not limited to". I think they are going to either frame him with social media posts, or just wait for a "mean tweet" and put him in jail. Worse yet - his team is asking for a 2026 trial date. If the judge suddenly and magically agrees and the DA also magically agrees then they are planning to put him away through the election.
Someone on his team needs to know this.
Here are his actual bail terms: https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23921620/23sc188947-consent-order.pdf
On Charlie Kirk yesterday, the programming was about 'NOT' having an election. Charlie seems to think the LEFT will come up with a 'false flag' to do another lock down so that we can NOT go and vote. So the Left wants to cancel ELECTIONS. That is their next move according to Charlie.
That sounds right. I have a gut feeling that something will happen to stop the election from happening at all.
In a "normal" election year there would by now already be plenty of feel-good being pumped into people's lives. Instead we have the ever-unfolding Biden family disasters, the artificial support of the expensive and unpopular Ukraine war, wages falling way behind inflation, so much bad stuff.
I suspect they don't feel they can stop Trump from winning, not even with the fake criminal charges, so their only alternative is to shut everything down and they want a Yuuge false flag to do it.
Charlie Kirk found Tuesday's New York Times Newspaper and in one section was written TO SAVE OUR DEMOCRACY WE MUST STOP HAVING ELECTIONS. He showed it on yesterdays programming. So this is the Lefts new plan to stop President Trump from running.
It's not conjecture. Several msm outlets started floating anti-election editorials at the same time last week. Whenever they coordinate themes like this they are laying the groundwork for the next psyop. Mainstreet America is being groomed to consider Democracy the unassailable American value, and Elections as a threat to it. Just as Rush Limbaugh always used to say.
upvoted
But Democrats are, for once, telling the truth: Elections—which to them means exclusively "rigged, stolen, fake elections"—are indeed a threat to democracy; while free and fair elections, which Trump is fighting for, are the proof of it.
Well yeah the entire thing is nonsensical. "Elections are a threat to democracy" is like saying "kings are a threat to monarchies"
Yes. And Charlie Kirk said for us to replace the word 'Democracy' with 'Oligarchy' and it will make much better sense.
Certainly feels that way with the masks coming back
Juan O Savin and Jan Halper - both of them also believe there may not be a 2024 election.
Juan is #1 on my list... of people who are consistently wrong on absolutely everything. Having that track record is impressive, so I will say he is wrong on this as well.
Who sits there talking but filming their boots
It's like he doesn't know about that little button on the phone....
He does this for two reasons: to help obfuscate his sullied identity and it's also a form of narrative film mystique to better "captivate" his audience.
Juano is about as big a loser as they come in regards to paytriots. The folks who are roped into his sophistry are no different than normies blindly trusting the MSM.
He predicted Biden will. be inaugurated in 2021. He was the only one who espoused that idea and I hated him. But he turned out to be right.
He predicted that Trump would be arrested on not one or two but multiple different charged and I mocked him and bet against that happening, but ultimately he was proven corect.
Very specifically, recently he claimed some important election fraud information will be coming out in michigan and couple weeks later it happened.
I have no doubt at this point that, while he is no where near fully clued in, he is probably more clued in than most people who are not in any pubicly official position.
This guy is a clown.
He drove around in his super car convincing everyone to put bets on Trump being President in 2021 and said he had $500K bets in Vegas on it.
He is probably an owner of a casino in Vegas and was laughing at all the fools all the way to the bank.
I dont think so also. With a demented resident anything is possible even a war.
The left knows how bad he is but notice they are not worried by putting up another candidate just in case.
I believe there won't be because DJT will be reinstated before then.
Even if he's reinstated, there would need to be an election. My money is on the election going forward, because they always do.
The Left are trying their best to rid us of elections. That way they will have full control of the world.