Calculating the exact probability of a specific sequence of decimal digits occurring as a result of a division between a random 8-digit number and 2024 is quite complex due to the nature of random number distribution and the factors involved in the division.
However, we can make a rough estimate based on the assumption that each digit in a random 8-digit number is equally likely and independent of the others. The probability of any specific sequence of digits occurring in an 8-digit number is 1 in 10^8 (10 to the power of 8), which is 1 in 100,000,000.
Now, the probability of getting a specific sequence of 12 digits (170454545454545) in the decimal expansion of the division result is even lower, considering the range of possible results.
Since there are numerous factors and assumptions involved, the "extremely low odds" would indeed be on the order of 1 in many millions or even billions.
Remember, these estimates are rough and simplified, and actual probability calculations would require more detailed analysis and consideration of the specific mathematical properties at play.
note, i got a C in statistics in college so I don't know if I'm asking the right question to ChatGPT
The odds of having 561 (which Trump recently wrote about; not to mention the associated Q drop number; not to mention the sum of the numbers from 1 to 33 is 561 and I view 33 to be a number representing Jesus (the Sun of Righteousness)), 17, the "0" separator, and 45 repeating based on the inmate number divided by the election year must be astronomical. Surely the Patriots chose the inmate number, but even then, how the f**k do they manage to get all of the preceding to "puke out" based upon a number which may represent an IP address of the DoD divided by a fixed year number of 2024?
I’ve long wondered how some of these intricacies have fallen into place. There are super military computers or some other ai or technology that is part of all this.
The “all digits are independent” assumption completely throws off the estimate, because it’s pretty obvious with the repeated 45s that they’re not independent. And it seems that ChatGPT even messed up following its own logic, because it also seemed to assume that every 8-digit number would give a completely different decimal expansion, which is how it got that 1/10^8.
For the exact chance you have to count the number of quotients that reduce to a whole number plus 345/2024. The chance of any number having a specific remainder (e.g. 345) when divided by 2024 is approximately 1/2024 (not exact because we don’t have an exact multiple of 2024 different inputs). Still unlikely but not the astronomical number ChatGPT gave you.
I am starting to call it ChatBS. It’s great when you need some existing stuff put into shape, when you want help getting to a first draft, and many other cases, but you gotta mistrust its brain and check up on it like you would a person who isn’t very bright. I started to trust it a little bit then discovered a complete nonsense word salad sentence in the middle of a paragraph I had thought it nailed.
I tried asking questions about a replacement part. What I got back didn’t make sense size wise. I ended up asking if it was just making stuff up and it admitted it didn’t have an answer.
561.170454545
What are the odds that 17 and 45 45 45 are in the decimal digits?
We need a statistics fag
Also 45 repeats for infinity when rounding
The result of dividing 1135809 by 2024, rounded to 100 decimal places, is approximately:
561.170454545454545454545454545454545454545454545454545454545454545454545454545454545454545454545454545
Edit:
I asked ChatGPT:
Calculating the exact probability of a specific sequence of decimal digits occurring as a result of a division between a random 8-digit number and 2024 is quite complex due to the nature of random number distribution and the factors involved in the division.
However, we can make a rough estimate based on the assumption that each digit in a random 8-digit number is equally likely and independent of the others. The probability of any specific sequence of digits occurring in an 8-digit number is 1 in 10^8 (10 to the power of 8), which is 1 in 100,000,000.
Now, the probability of getting a specific sequence of 12 digits (170454545454545) in the decimal expansion of the division result is even lower, considering the range of possible results.
Since there are numerous factors and assumptions involved, the "extremely low odds" would indeed be on the order of 1 in many millions or even billions.
Remember, these estimates are rough and simplified, and actual probability calculations would require more detailed analysis and consideration of the specific mathematical properties at play.
note, i got a C in statistics in college so I don't know if I'm asking the right question to ChatGPT
I didn't mention it yet, but what also blew my mind was the "0" separator that popped up recently too.
https://greatawakening.win/p/16c2RSI1OJ/55--incoming-lets-fuggn-goooo/
Here is my comment about that. https://greatawakening.win/p/16c2RSI1OJ/x/c/4TwSP3vvrFI
The odds of having 561 (which Trump recently wrote about; not to mention the associated Q drop number; not to mention the sum of the numbers from 1 to 33 is 561 and I view 33 to be a number representing Jesus (the Sun of Righteousness)), 17, the "0" separator, and 45 repeating based on the inmate number divided by the election year must be astronomical. Surely the Patriots chose the inmate number, but even then, how the f**k do they manage to get all of the preceding to "puke out" based upon a number which may represent an IP address of the DoD divided by a fixed year number of 2024?
https://qalerts.app/?q=how+many+coincidences
Dang nice!
I’ve long wondered how some of these intricacies have fallen into place. There are super military computers or some other ai or technology that is part of all this.
The “all digits are independent” assumption completely throws off the estimate, because it’s pretty obvious with the repeated 45s that they’re not independent. And it seems that ChatGPT even messed up following its own logic, because it also seemed to assume that every 8-digit number would give a completely different decimal expansion, which is how it got that 1/10^8.
For the exact chance you have to count the number of quotients that reduce to a whole number plus 345/2024. The chance of any number having a specific remainder (e.g. 345) when divided by 2024 is approximately 1/2024 (not exact because we don’t have an exact multiple of 2024 different inputs). Still unlikely but not the astronomical number ChatGPT gave you.
I am starting to call it ChatBS. It’s great when you need some existing stuff put into shape, when you want help getting to a first draft, and many other cases, but you gotta mistrust its brain and check up on it like you would a person who isn’t very bright. I started to trust it a little bit then discovered a complete nonsense word salad sentence in the middle of a paragraph I had thought it nailed.
I tried asking questions about a replacement part. What I got back didn’t make sense size wise. I ended up asking if it was just making stuff up and it admitted it didn’t have an answer.
I used ChatGPT for the first time yesterday. ChatGPT can’t even do basic math. There are reasons for it if you Google up that question.
Wish I knew how to post the Trump4Ever meme.
u/#trump4eva
Check it out: https://greatawakening.win/p/142BF5stOB/
Sweet thanks!
u/# trump4eva
You gotta take out the space to make it work.