Phil Fraudlewski at it again
(twitter.com)
Comments (15)
sorted by:
IF I was asked the same questions I would have answered similarly. I have been a truther for decades. Phil handled the questions well in my opinion.
I need transcripts and court documentation or a docket number. I have yet to find one. I would love for this to be true but even Nuremberg had detailed transcripts and/documentation
...and now we know much of Nuremberg was a fraud.
Partially
If you are fairly sure this is true, maybe you can explain this to me - why are we covering up the fact that these persons were put to death, and why are we using clones or body doubles to stand in for them? Especially since these 'doubles' are making horrible decisions that are affecting our country negatively.
I have spent many hours over many years JUST looking at images of these and other so called famous people. NO amount of surgery can explain the anomalies. ie Hillary shrunk 10 inches, ear lobes change etc etc etc. I will not debate anyone on this. Do your own research.
You missed my point. I didn't say it isn't plausible. What I am asking is, why? Why not just disclose that they have been put to death? Why do we need to keep the illusion going and pretend they are still alive, if they are not?
That's the point I don't understand. Do you know?
Information Warfare.
Ask yourself what’s differences between before and after u knew about Q or truths, misinformation and disinformation etc…
This is all information, whether it be true or not, that I heard well before PG live streamed it.
Who is this guy? Why is he on trial?
Appears to be a deposition, presumably in support of some other trial, rather than the speaker being on trial himself. But who is on trial and why is the questioning taking place at all are good questions.
Isn’t he in a law suit with a newspaper? He says they defamed him in an article.
Ah, that could be it. Makes sense.
bump