Proof no plane ever hit the pentagon.
(youtu.be)
Comments (20)
sorted by:
First of all, that aircraft did not accelerate to 500 MPH. It would have taken at least twice that length of the runway to accomplish. Secondly, The concrete wall was 'floated' on air bearings, which means the 'wall' could move upon impact. THIS does NOT prove that a plane did not hit the Pentagon. Another factor is the fact that this block of concrete is 3 feet thick.
I'm not a GD glowie. I appreciate good evidence, but disinformation does us no favors. I'll never say that a plane hit the Pentagon, I am only saying this isn't proof. I know nothing was wrong with building 7 and it was taken down with explosives. I am also aware that planes alone did not cause all the damage to the Towers, however, to say there were no planes is ignorant.
I said no plane hit the pentagon… glowie.
The WTC 1 and 2 maybe.. I wasn’t there. And if planes did hit. It was remote controlled no doubt.
Pentagon for sure no plane. They would have shown the footage from the many cameras in the area. Why was all the footage confiscated? Because it proves there was no plane but a missile instead. And if the footage shows a missile then it was either hostile world powers, and that would make our defense look weak and pathetic, or it was our own military capability, and that still makes us look pathetic for doing this to our own.
Weak response. First reaction I had when I saw the full speed in the clip was, "that doesn't look like it's very fast for a jet". Anyone should come to that conclusion. Anyone should be able to see how short that distance was, as well.
I suggest you stiffen that wrist because your response to criticism was pretty limp. Your second response was better, but still ruined by "glowie". Questioning you doesn't make someone a glowie.
I get that this concrete is different. Just looking at this film I don't see how the jet going any faster would change anything. Once again I am only talking about this film.
One thing is amazing. They were able to find the passports and from what I understand the passports were in fairly good condition. After watching this I am a little amazed by that. I know it's not the same but there was a fireball.
What I want to know is what happen to the plane and the people on it? I had a cousin on the "suppose plane" that went into the Pentagon. The citizens of our Country deserve answers!
The CIA/Mossad pilot depressurizes cabin at altitude, oxygen tanks replaced with nitrogen, plane files off to Israel
Full text of this book found here
Absolute gentlemen, thank you for the link.
Thanks, I was able to order the book from EBay.
Most likely human ritual. My guess is plane landed at some airbase or military installation, passengers executed or used for experiments…
Not sure I would call that "proof" but it is very instructive. What I take away from this is at about 2:05 in the video, the amount of compression made in the concrete barrier. It didn't shatter or break, it just compressed into a concave dent. Of course it could have been fresh concrete, still not fully cured and set up...maybe that's why it compressed so much.
…. The perfect circle made in the pentagon before the roof collapse would like to have a word with you. Also the cruise missile that made the hole would like to sit in on the conversation.
Yup. WTC7 was my wake-up call to start paying attention and questioning everything.
Well my point was that in the video, the concrete compressed into a concave dent. At the Pentagon, whatever hit it made a hole through the concrete. I'm not disputing the missile theory at all, just observing the two different results in the concrete.
One possible variable is the age of the concrete... the Pentagon has stood since 1941 (oddly enough, the work began on Sept. 11, 1941...how's THAT for a coincidence?) and had many decades to harden and "set." The concrete barrier in the video above, well we don't know how old that barrier was... weeks? months?
It takes a long time for concrete to fully harden. So two flying objects hitting concrete at speed...one makes a dent, and one makes a hole. That is ALL I am pointing out, nothing more, nothing less. Don't read into my post more than I wrote.
This test was to see what would have happened if a plane flew into a nuclear reactor concrete containment. And, those pesky wing tips that survived.
The judicial watch foia of the video pretty much ends the debate. The object in the video was the size of a missile. Not 45’ h 757 compared to a 77’ h building.