Its like what i always point out; occording to the official narrative, jetfuel can: melt steel beams, burn for 3 months (the pit was still smoldering in december) but not burn passport paper
If I recall correctly . . . engines were found and there was talk of them not being the correct engines. I think there was a group Pilots for 9/11 Truth that brought this aspect of it up - also issues with flight paths. I didn't look much into that aspect as there was enough shared by AE911 for me to know the official story was hogwash.
I found it interesting that the terrorists had plans for months after the attack and they seemed real. I wonder if the attack was all done remotely by the government
I actually believe it was both. Planes flying into the buildings as cover for explosives and controlled demolition. Too many eyewitness testimony to deny planes. And I believe our government planned it and used the Saudis as terrorists to make it believable.
Bombs or thermite plus the airplanes is what makes the most sense, IMO. There's a great video of somebody testing the thermite theory and it cut a steel beam like butter.
No load on the steel beams, just a guy in his backyard doing a science experiment. Government could do that in a much more effective manner, and it would line up with the video footage of molten metal pouring from the towers
I don't believe the official narrative but yes, with enough velocity and inertia it could.
Even water could; a waterjet can pierce through steel.
A jet weighs dozens of tons. The entire momentum of all that fast moving mass is transferred to the structure.
This isn't the smoking gun you're looking for, but there's plenty of smoking guns elsewhere, such as the subsequent destruction, pulverization and freefall of the towers.
Oh.... and he's a dual-citizen to Israel and 100% MOSSAD and his parents were from UKRAINE
so.... CGI, in light of this smoking gun and the all the videos and witnesses, is a rather silly disinfo theory, in my humble opinion. Not to mention, if they were just going to use CGI, why would Zakheim expose or fabricate his obvious role in the Plot?
What is effectively a tin can cannot go thru 6-8 foot reinforced and hardened steel alloys.
Even so, in the thousands of photos taken during and after, where did those engines go?
They disintegrated on inpact.... but the passport of one of the "terrorists" magically survived unscathed.
Its like what i always point out; occording to the official narrative, jetfuel can: melt steel beams, burn for 3 months (the pit was still smoldering in december) but not burn passport paper
Those passports must be made of asbestos.
If I recall correctly . . . engines were found and there was talk of them not being the correct engines. I think there was a group Pilots for 9/11 Truth that brought this aspect of it up - also issues with flight paths. I didn't look much into that aspect as there was enough shared by AE911 for me to know the official story was hogwash.
Seems all they had planned for this narrative was just planes, and not the where when and how
I found it interesting that the terrorists had plans for months after the attack and they seemed real. I wonder if the attack was all done remotely by the government
Very interesting... https://steemit.com/education/@artistiquejewels/hillary-clinton-more-than-meets-the-eye-patents-intellectual-property-planes-a-crashing-mysterious-dying-oh-my-allegedly-of
Yes. A duck flew into an elephant. I know.
I actually believe it was both. Planes flying into the buildings as cover for explosives and controlled demolition. Too many eyewitness testimony to deny planes. And I believe our government planned it and used the Saudis as terrorists to make it believable.
Spot on. 👍
Bombs or thermite plus the airplanes is what makes the most sense, IMO. There's a great video of somebody testing the thermite theory and it cut a steel beam like butter.
No load on the steel beams, just a guy in his backyard doing a science experiment. Government could do that in a much more effective manner, and it would line up with the video footage of molten metal pouring from the towers
Makes sense to me too.
I don't believe the official narrative but yes, with enough velocity and inertia it could.
Even water could; a waterjet can pierce through steel.
A jet weighs dozens of tons. The entire momentum of all that fast moving mass is transferred to the structure.
This isn't the smoking gun you're looking for, but there's plenty of smoking guns elsewhere, such as the subsequent destruction, pulverization and freefall of the towers.
High performance, high explosive, reinforced and retrofitted DRONES:
Courtesy of central figure in the 9/11 Plot, Dov Zakheim who was:
Pentagon Comptroller that stole the $2.3 Trillion
Sat on the board at Raytheon, makers of bunker buster bombs
Was CEO of Securacom, the security company that took over the WTC right after the 1993 Bombing
Board member of Systems Planning Corporation, makers of the Flight Termination System, designed to TAKEOVER and LAND hijacked airliners ( how Ironic )
Had contract with US Air Force to retrofit 36 Boeing 767's into fueling platforms, out of Macdill AFB in Tampa
Signed the PNAC, which called for a 'Pearl Harbor' like event to springboard US Military intervention in the Mideast
Oh.... and he's a dual-citizen to Israel and 100% MOSSAD and his parents were from UKRAINE
so.... CGI, in light of this smoking gun and the all the videos and witnesses, is a rather silly disinfo theory, in my humble opinion. Not to mention, if they were just going to use CGI, why would Zakheim expose or fabricate his obvious role in the Plot?
you guys think he was being given information from white hats at this time already?