I think anyone can accept that a prez might at times, use a body double for certain things. But by framing it as "One of the actors pretending to be Joe Biden", he's feeding directly into and stoking the "Joe Biden is not Joe Biden, and Joe was executed at Gitmo a while back" narrative.
bleah. People get so wrapped up in that narrative. The way they do, it's hard to NOT think its a psyop to distract and paint the Patriots and anons etc, as nutso.
(You may get the sense that I don't buy the "the Real Joe is gone" narrative. You'd be right. Too hard to prove, no point to proving it (only lays a foundation for further purely speculative conceptualization), not a factor.)
I agree. This video proves nothing. If it was Biden, the guards were merely outside of camera range when nobody else was around (though maybe poor procedure---which argues that it was not Biden). If it was not Biden, I didn't hear him claiming to be Biden or pretending to be Biden. It could have been just another dude with white hair. He sure seemed to walk with more balance and control than Biden.
Also, when and where was this supposed to have taken place. Too many videos without provenance.
Tautology. Saying that every photo or video of "joe biden' published after Nov 2017 is not the real Joe Biden, and therefor, hes gone, because every photo of "joe biden' published after Nov 2017 is not the real Joe Biden - seems a bit reductive.
I agree, there has been no credible explanatory reason how or why the real JB is gone. Like, real world reasons not wishful thinking. But I do think its hilarious when the claims of photo and video evidence come around once in a while. They don't prove anything claimed, they're just funny that people spend this much effort on a theory.
My friend and I went on a mission to look at different images of Joe over the years. The “old” Joe Biden has a hard look on his face. If you look at the pics of him in 2008 and even the video of “This is a big F*in deal” video from the Obamacare celebration, that is the old Joe.
But somewhere between then and 2016, Joe’s face changed to a softer version. To me, that is not age. And then you have the Getty image photo of him at a 9/11 ceremony with an obvious silicone mask tab on his ear, with heavy makeup visible.
AND, his official signature changed after he was inaugurated.
There are many clues about a “new” Joe Biden when you look closely. Even more interesting is how he seems to have changed before Trump was elected. Why? Was the white hat operation already underway during Obama’s presidency? The apparent arrest of HRC at the 2016 9/11 ceremony seems to suggest that. Along with Comey being forced to talk about her emails in October before an election. So many oddities. Clues?
Random comment:
The spin on this thing ooozes.
I think anyone can accept that a prez might at times, use a body double for certain things. But by framing it as "One of the actors pretending to be Joe Biden", he's feeding directly into and stoking the "Joe Biden is not Joe Biden, and Joe was executed at Gitmo a while back" narrative.
bleah. People get so wrapped up in that narrative. The way they do, it's hard to NOT think its a psyop to distract and paint the Patriots and anons etc, as nutso.
(You may get the sense that I don't buy the "the Real Joe is gone" narrative. You'd be right. Too hard to prove, no point to proving it (only lays a foundation for further purely speculative conceptualization), not a factor.)
I agree. This video proves nothing. If it was Biden, the guards were merely outside of camera range when nobody else was around (though maybe poor procedure---which argues that it was not Biden). If it was not Biden, I didn't hear him claiming to be Biden or pretending to be Biden. It could have been just another dude with white hair. He sure seemed to walk with more balance and control than Biden.
Also, when and where was this supposed to have taken place. Too many videos without provenance.
There's been no photo or video published of the real Joe Biden since November 2017. So it's a fair assumption that he's gone.
Tautology. Saying that every photo or video of "joe biden' published after Nov 2017 is not the real Joe Biden, and therefor, hes gone, because every photo of "joe biden' published after Nov 2017 is not the real Joe Biden - seems a bit reductive.
i just had to look up tautology's meaning lol
bahahahahaha I can't even I'm just gonna exit this thread now
I agree, there has been no credible explanatory reason how or why the real JB is gone. Like, real world reasons not wishful thinking. But I do think its hilarious when the claims of photo and video evidence come around once in a while. They don't prove anything claimed, they're just funny that people spend this much effort on a theory.
My friend and I went on a mission to look at different images of Joe over the years. The “old” Joe Biden has a hard look on his face. If you look at the pics of him in 2008 and even the video of “This is a big F*in deal” video from the Obamacare celebration, that is the old Joe.
But somewhere between then and 2016, Joe’s face changed to a softer version. To me, that is not age. And then you have the Getty image photo of him at a 9/11 ceremony with an obvious silicone mask tab on his ear, with heavy makeup visible.
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/president-joe-biden-attends-the-ceremony-at-the-national-9-news-photo/1235181192
AND, his official signature changed after he was inaugurated.
There are many clues about a “new” Joe Biden when you look closely. Even more interesting is how he seems to have changed before Trump was elected. Why? Was the white hat operation already underway during Obama’s presidency? The apparent arrest of HRC at the 2016 9/11 ceremony seems to suggest that. Along with Comey being forced to talk about her emails in October before an election. So many oddities. Clues?