The "Nazis" are not the Truth that would damage peoples brains. It is who the Nazis really are, what the larger group that created them has really done, how far back this really goes, who is really in charge, AND, as you stated, what information has been repressed. However, I do not think your interpretation is correct. I think Q is explicitly stating that the truth about those things would put 99% of the population into a mental hospital if revealed all at once, without being prepared first.
What if, for example, there are underground installations (or cities) that look exactly like Hellraiser (the movie), where children are bred by the millions for sex, sacrifice, blood, and soul consumption? What if the people in charge (who created the Nazis) were regular visitors of these child factories and/or customers? What if the entity in charge of these installations weren't human? What if that entity is Yahweh, a being that may not be from what we think of as "our dimension," but is perfectly capable of promoting itself as "a god" here on earth? This is the same entity that, according to the official narrative (what we call "The Bible"), is a child sacrifice demanding, slavery and rape condoning, eugenics and racist promoting,. genocidal (only the Chosen Race is worthy of survival) entity that sits at the top of the narrative of most of the world's core belief systems for the past two millennia or so. Something like 2/3rds of the planet believes in YHWH as the Source of All Things. What if it is instead an Usurper, a Pretender to the Throne, and ultimately, the creator of all of these, what we call "evil" institutions?
How many people would be able to handle that information if it were true?
I don't know if those statements are true, but there is a fair bit of evidence that supports all of them. Regardless of what the truth is, I bet it's on that level of cognitive dissonance inducing. Some information is just too much to handle. When evidence threatens core beliefs in a way that can't be rectified reasonably, it can instead destroy the brain. I think the nature of our reality, the knowledge that has been hidden (occult knowledge) is information that would do that to 99% of humanity, or would have at the time of the post. Now maybe it's only 95%. Maybe someday it will only be 50%. Maybe there will be avenues to find the truth at that point, for those that choose to look.
most normie morons can't imagine not eating breakfast yesterday. The ability to comprehend a several-thousand-year old death cult (possibly several HUNDRED thousand years old) manipulating and brainwashing society and culture over multiple millennia is totally incomprehensible to them.
It's not just "incomprehensible," it's not even possible for most to consider it right now, even most of those who are "awake." If you can't possibly consider evidence, but evidence is shown to you in a way that you must consider it, that level of cognitive dissonance breaks the brain. That is what "would put 99% of people in the hospital."
I think the information on the true scope of the death cult is being released. I think it will continue to be shown, just slowly. It has to be slowly.
The choice to know what we have found, verified and presented is entirely up to YOU.
I think the whole story, all of the evidence, will be able to be found out by those willing to look, but not everyone alive in this generation will choose to do so. I think it will likely take a generation or two to disseminate the nature of our reality and the source of our belief systems, to the masses.
but god damn is it so fucking tiring. Whoever posted that meme earlier with the "elite" v "normie" v "autistanon" rock paper scissors chart was so right
I think your right, it will take generations to fully grasp what is going on.
I was very naive to the evil.... when they passed the bill in NY to "abort" born babies.... I freaked, they would have untrackable babies to do with as they wish. A gentle anon pointed me towards the truth, and fuck... like a sledgehammer to my soul.
And to be honest even tho I KNOW, there's still a sliver hope I'm wrong, when that tiniest wisp of false hope is finally stripped away.... idk. I spend a lot of effort praying and avoiding the details of thinking on the horrors these poor people endured.
I'm so tired if hearing this idea that we "gotta wait for the herd to awaken"
No we don't. Fuck the herd. We haven't educated ourselves, made the necessary moves and sacrifices and played by all the rules to be governed by the speed of the herd...
We're ready. Let's get it on.
Yeah... I think everyone here knows there's going to be some uncomfortable truths and downright evil possibilities that we haven't fathomed before (because we're not evil bastards) - but if the worst of humanity has been doing their dance under our feet this whole time, we'll be pissed, but hospital? I think not. Maybe the mouth breathers will blow a gasket, but not us.
If the herd isn't ready, then some in the herd will oppose the cure and help hide the evil bastards so they can rise to power again. This can't be like an election where 55% of us impose our ideas on the other 45%. It has to be overwhelmingly supported and implemented in every corner of society. Any herd members remaining with doubts will have to be rolled up with the bad guys.
Like crabs in a bushel basket, pulling anyone who attempts to escape back down into the chaos...
So are the days of our lives...
You have to overcome all this bs - rise above it. Not just believe, but KNOW you are more than your physical body. Discover your place in eternity. Find out who you really are ...WAY more than some character named whatever playing this Earth game.
Then, regardless of what happens, you'll be strong enough to deal with whatever goes down. It's not called the road less traveled for nothing. You won't "get there" by polling the herd to see if you're "doing it right".
if we go by the American Revolution type stats where 3% of the population was needed to shift the tides; with a global population of ~8.1 Billion, we'd only need roughly 243 million to be alert (theoretically)
Beautifully said, Slyver. THAT would absolutely SHATTER so many people's paradigm - to the point that they wouldn't be able to recover.
There's a certain level of spiritual maturity required to weather this storm and come out one piece on the other side. Sadly, very few have permitted themselves to venture outside of conventional pathways in order to find the real truth. That includes a high percentage of frens here.
I think you are on to something here. I believe there is also so much more. We have to have strong minds and hearts so we will be the percentage of people who do not go insane as truth is revealed. (The 1%).
Don't forget the Luciferians/globalists/fallen ones have manipulated and lied about everything for thousands of years (yes, even the bible has been tampered with). Be strong enough to handle the truth.
ultimately we each have to strive for a relationship with God that will give us spiritual confirmation of whether we have heard something that is the truth or that is a lie. If you receive in your heart the knowledge that you have ascertained something to be true, let those things light your path. Either to move away from something you learn is deception, or towards a truth. Not everyone can hear their own "still, small voice" of intuition, or audibly hear or see something that supports something as true. You might have to get very very quiet to begin to hear.
This ties in with my recent comment on this thread. I think it would have to be religious in nature destroying all major ideas combined with us living in a matrix as a slave colony or something absolutely wild.
Maybe we are in hell/pergutory and that’s why shit is so messed up. And will be biblical is the end of this nonsense.
I have even gone so deep down the rabbit hole that the Illuminati may actually be worshipping the real creator and everything else is a lie. I don’t believe this but I think it would take something that level of crazy
Speaking of that, did you know that there is a form of gnosticism that seems to say that there is this goddess, Pistis Sophia, that created a Demiurge god & hid him in a cloud, because she didn't create him with the consent of the highest father god that carries no name?
Some would say this Demiurge was called Yaldabaoth (& there may be some that believe he has some connection to, or even is YHWH) In Christian gnosticism some believe that Christ came down to free people from this god, etc
Have you heard of all that or did you just think of this on your own? Anyways, there was a time when I was curious of gnosticsm but then the group of them I was with, went all woke on me & kicked me out! Can you believe that? (Long story - we were talking politics, not religion but politics. They are incredibly woke libtards. In a calm voice I pointed to a simple contradiction which made the priest resign on the spot! lol! Then the bishop came in & kicked me out)
After that I began to wonder about all that stuff & went back to a more conventional church. Of course now even they are going all woke too so IDK! I figured I should point that out though, since you seemed to stumble upon this.
I am aware of Gnosticism and Sophia (AKA the "Holy Spirit" in Christian doctrine), and the Demiurge (which has origins 500 to possibly thousands of years before the Gnostics came online). I study all the ancient religions, as well as the more recent ones, not to find "the truth" but to find the similarities and the differences in their dogma. I use these ideas as references to dig deeper.
There is great scholarship out there, but if you restrict yourself to one ideal you will not see it. I recommend not looking to any one source for the Truth about Source, rather let your intuition guide you through all of the controversy. Recognize that pretty much all religions have the same source (the Cabal), or they have been taken over by them after the fact, and are thus controlled by them today.
I suggest the Truth can't be found in any "religion," rather the Truth Is Whatever It Is, and learning how to listen to it will help you to understand that it has already revealed itself.
Of course that doesn't necessarily help with some of the details, but the details of history aren't nearly as important as learning how to listen to Source when it speaks, which is all the time.
Beautifully said Slyver, IDK why you got the downvote. I'm curious which religions you think are cabal source vs the ones taken over by them. I had the sense that. before Constantine, Christianity was a bunch of independent churches honestly seeking the truth to at least some degree. Of course, there are some who would question Paul or even Peter but certainly not Jesus. I have had my own experience which tells me exactly how divine he truly is.
IDK if I have studied as much as you but I marvel at similarities between cultures which had no history of ever being in contact. For instance, the Orthodox Christians have a "40 day mass" for the dead. (Which in practice is usually performed a little more than 40 days after death but never before) and I have heard that the Tibetan Buddhists have a 49 day period after death, both of these periods have to do with the soul's journey after death to prepare for the next phase.
I've also thought of things like, since Abraham spoke a sematic and that the preface a' in those languages usually means 'of' or 'son of'. His name could have been: a'Braham and Brahan is very similar to Brahmin, which is the name of the highest god in the neighboring country (India) So it seems like there is some ancient connection between those 2 very different cultures.
Anyways, I'm just curious what else you may have noticed.
I'm curious which religions you think are cabal source vs the ones taken over by them
This is difficult to say. I could go through a list, but then I'd have to justify them, and that is a book length endeavor. In addition it would be largely speculative. I am constantly finding new evidence on these things that makes me lean one way or another. Not about everything, some are pretty clear cut, but some are so clouded in history, taking any sort of stand one way or the other seems foolish.
Christianity was a bunch of independent churches honestly seeking the truth to at least some degree.
I have that sense as well. My research suggests there was a lot of controversy of ideas, a lot of debate. Constantine ended that debate by making specific tenets (some taken from other religions, like Mithraism) into Roman Law (believe these things or else!).
I marvel at similarities between cultures which had no history of ever being in contact.
Those cultures had a lot of contact. The idea that there was no contact between East and West is a lie. Not only did they have contact (travel) between all those areas, their cultures were all founded (or subsumed) by the same group of people, the people we call the Scythians (or their progenitors).
The Scythians have been effectively removed from history, with nothing but lies, largely in the form of purposeful disconnections, left in its place. Until people understand who they were, it is impossible to understand the ancient world. You might know the Scythians as the Tartarians. They are the same group of people. People who look into Tartary are all forced to look into the wrong thing (giants, free energy, "Tartarians in America" and all that other bullshit). By keeping Tartary researchers focused on these mostly unrelated topics, it steers people away from that realization: Tartary was just Scythia, and Scythia ruled about 25% of the planet (approximately the area known as the USSR, though at times extending far beyond that) for 3000 to 5000 years.
Their removal from history in the early 20th century is, imo, the greatest scam of our Age, and likely the key to understanding everything.
What is the basis of Gnosticism, the Demiurge? While I agree that is a part of Gnostic teaching, the idea of a "demigod" (non-corporeal self-aware split apart from Source) that ruled the earth while pretending to be Source has origins that go back very far, thousands of years, long before there were people that call themselves "Gnostics," at least according to history.
And it is how people are controlled, in so many cases.
What is how people are controlled?
Negation - what is cannot be named, only what it is not.
I suggest that "naming" anything (in the way we do it) is a false naming in the sense that words have definitions, and definitions are always incomplete.
Gnosticism is what Marx, Rothschilds, Schwab use
Not really. They use what I call The One religion, but a specific sect of it. The One religion is the only religion that actually exists, all other religions are front organizations that lead to that same religion in their occult mysteries. Whether any particular religion started as front organizations, or has been taken over to join them is difficult to say, but that seems to be how it is set up now, and has been for at least two millennia, though likely much longer.
The One religion teaches that "Thou art God" as one of it's primary tenets. Inherent in that tenet is the connectedness of all things. We are all God (Source), thus we are all created equally Divine, created from and inseparably connected to the Fundamental.
Some of the sects of The One religion teach a focus on the "self" aspect of that Divinity, teaching how to rise above the other split-aparts of Source (other people). It is this literally self centered aspect that sets apart the teachings of The One religion of the Cabal and The One religion of other adherents.
Gnosticism does not, at least on the surface, present itself as a self centered cult, it is merely part of The One religion, and that can be confusing at first. There are many similarities between these different sects. The primary difference is the focus on self, or the focus on the connectedness, and the intrinsic respect in that connection. In this other aspect, to respect others is to respect yourself, because everyone is fundamentally Source.
There's a great deal more to it than that. At some point I will write it up formally. It's pretty important to understand The One religion, and the differences in the various associated cults I think.
The "Nazis" are not the Truth that would damage peoples brains. It is who the Nazis really are, what the larger group that created them has really done, how far back this really goes, who is really in charge, AND, as you stated, what information has been repressed. However, I do not think your interpretation is correct. I think Q is explicitly stating that the truth about those things would put 99% of the population into a mental hospital if revealed all at once, without being prepared first.
What if, for example, there are underground installations (or cities) that look exactly like Hellraiser (the movie), where children are bred by the millions for sex, sacrifice, blood, and soul consumption? What if the people in charge (who created the Nazis) were regular visitors of these child factories and/or customers? What if the entity in charge of these installations weren't human? What if that entity is Yahweh, a being that may not be from what we think of as "our dimension," but is perfectly capable of promoting itself as "a god" here on earth? This is the same entity that, according to the official narrative (what we call "The Bible"), is a child sacrifice demanding, slavery and rape condoning, eugenics and racist promoting,. genocidal (only the Chosen Race is worthy of survival) entity that sits at the top of the narrative of most of the world's core belief systems for the past two millennia or so. Something like 2/3rds of the planet believes in YHWH as the Source of All Things. What if it is instead an Usurper, a Pretender to the Throne, and ultimately, the creator of all of these, what we call "evil" institutions?
How many people would be able to handle that information if it were true?
I don't know if those statements are true, but there is a fair bit of evidence that supports all of them. Regardless of what the truth is, I bet it's on that level of cognitive dissonance inducing. Some information is just too much to handle. When evidence threatens core beliefs in a way that can't be rectified reasonably, it can instead destroy the brain. I think the nature of our reality, the knowledge that has been hidden (occult knowledge) is information that would do that to 99% of humanity, or would have at the time of the post. Now maybe it's only 95%. Maybe someday it will only be 50%. Maybe there will be avenues to find the truth at that point, for those that choose to look.
most normie morons can't imagine not eating breakfast yesterday. The ability to comprehend a several-thousand-year old death cult (possibly several HUNDRED thousand years old) manipulating and brainwashing society and culture over multiple millennia is totally incomprehensible to them.
It's not just "incomprehensible," it's not even possible for most to consider it right now, even most of those who are "awake." If you can't possibly consider evidence, but evidence is shown to you in a way that you must consider it, that level of cognitive dissonance breaks the brain. That is what "would put 99% of people in the hospital."
I think the information on the true scope of the death cult is being released. I think it will continue to be shown, just slowly. It has to be slowly.
I think the whole story, all of the evidence, will be able to be found out by those willing to look, but not everyone alive in this generation will choose to do so. I think it will likely take a generation or two to disseminate the nature of our reality and the source of our belief systems, to the masses.
but god damn is it so fucking tiring. Whoever posted that meme earlier with the "elite" v "normie" v "autistanon" rock paper scissors chart was so right
I think your right, it will take generations to fully grasp what is going on.
I was very naive to the evil.... when they passed the bill in NY to "abort" born babies.... I freaked, they would have untrackable babies to do with as they wish. A gentle anon pointed me towards the truth, and fuck... like a sledgehammer to my soul.
And to be honest even tho I KNOW, there's still a sliver hope I'm wrong, when that tiniest wisp of false hope is finally stripped away.... idk. I spend a lot of effort praying and avoiding the details of thinking on the horrors these poor people endured.
But do they need to?
I'm so tired if hearing this idea that we "gotta wait for the herd to awaken"
No we don't. Fuck the herd. We haven't educated ourselves, made the necessary moves and sacrifices and played by all the rules to be governed by the speed of the herd...
We're ready. Let's get it on.
Yeah... I think everyone here knows there's going to be some uncomfortable truths and downright evil possibilities that we haven't fathomed before (because we're not evil bastards) - but if the worst of humanity has been doing their dance under our feet this whole time, we'll be pissed, but hospital? I think not. Maybe the mouth breathers will blow a gasket, but not us.
If the herd isn't ready, then some in the herd will oppose the cure and help hide the evil bastards so they can rise to power again. This can't be like an election where 55% of us impose our ideas on the other 45%. It has to be overwhelmingly supported and implemented in every corner of society. Any herd members remaining with doubts will have to be rolled up with the bad guys.
Like crabs in a bushel basket, pulling anyone who attempts to escape back down into the chaos...
So are the days of our lives...
You have to overcome all this bs - rise above it. Not just believe, but KNOW you are more than your physical body. Discover your place in eternity. Find out who you really are ...WAY more than some character named whatever playing this Earth game.
Then, regardless of what happens, you'll be strong enough to deal with whatever goes down. It's not called the road less traveled for nothing. You won't "get there" by polling the herd to see if you're "doing it right".
The herd will awaken at the beginning of the stampede.
only need 3%
if we go by the American Revolution type stats where 3% of the population was needed to shift the tides; with a global population of ~8.1 Billion, we'd only need roughly 243 million to be alert (theoretically)
Beautifully said, Slyver. THAT would absolutely SHATTER so many people's paradigm - to the point that they wouldn't be able to recover.
There's a certain level of spiritual maturity required to weather this storm and come out one piece on the other side. Sadly, very few have permitted themselves to venture outside of conventional pathways in order to find the real truth. That includes a high percentage of frens here.
I think you are on to something here. I believe there is also so much more. We have to have strong minds and hearts so we will be the percentage of people who do not go insane as truth is revealed. (The 1%).
Don't forget the Luciferians/globalists/fallen ones have manipulated and lied about everything for thousands of years (yes, even the bible has been tampered with). Be strong enough to handle the truth.
ultimately we each have to strive for a relationship with God that will give us spiritual confirmation of whether we have heard something that is the truth or that is a lie. If you receive in your heart the knowledge that you have ascertained something to be true, let those things light your path. Either to move away from something you learn is deception, or towards a truth. Not everyone can hear their own "still, small voice" of intuition, or audibly hear or see something that supports something as true. You might have to get very very quiet to begin to hear.
We definitely are not strong enough for the truth, we need God with us.
This ties in with my recent comment on this thread. I think it would have to be religious in nature destroying all major ideas combined with us living in a matrix as a slave colony or something absolutely wild.
Maybe we are in hell/pergutory and that’s why shit is so messed up. And will be biblical is the end of this nonsense.
I have even gone so deep down the rabbit hole that the Illuminati may actually be worshipping the real creator and everything else is a lie. I don’t believe this but I think it would take something that level of crazy
Speaking of that, did you know that there is a form of gnosticism that seems to say that there is this goddess, Pistis Sophia, that created a Demiurge god & hid him in a cloud, because she didn't create him with the consent of the highest father god that carries no name?
Some would say this Demiurge was called Yaldabaoth (& there may be some that believe he has some connection to, or even is YHWH) In Christian gnosticism some believe that Christ came down to free people from this god, etc
Have you heard of all that or did you just think of this on your own? Anyways, there was a time when I was curious of gnosticsm but then the group of them I was with, went all woke on me & kicked me out! Can you believe that? (Long story - we were talking politics, not religion but politics. They are incredibly woke libtards. In a calm voice I pointed to a simple contradiction which made the priest resign on the spot! lol! Then the bishop came in & kicked me out)
After that I began to wonder about all that stuff & went back to a more conventional church. Of course now even they are going all woke too so IDK! I figured I should point that out though, since you seemed to stumble upon this.
I am aware of Gnosticism and Sophia (AKA the "Holy Spirit" in Christian doctrine), and the Demiurge (which has origins 500 to possibly thousands of years before the Gnostics came online). I study all the ancient religions, as well as the more recent ones, not to find "the truth" but to find the similarities and the differences in their dogma. I use these ideas as references to dig deeper.
There is great scholarship out there, but if you restrict yourself to one ideal you will not see it. I recommend not looking to any one source for the Truth about Source, rather let your intuition guide you through all of the controversy. Recognize that pretty much all religions have the same source (the Cabal), or they have been taken over by them after the fact, and are thus controlled by them today.
I suggest the Truth can't be found in any "religion," rather the Truth Is Whatever It Is, and learning how to listen to it will help you to understand that it has already revealed itself.
Of course that doesn't necessarily help with some of the details, but the details of history aren't nearly as important as learning how to listen to Source when it speaks, which is all the time.
Beautifully said Slyver, IDK why you got the downvote. I'm curious which religions you think are cabal source vs the ones taken over by them. I had the sense that. before Constantine, Christianity was a bunch of independent churches honestly seeking the truth to at least some degree. Of course, there are some who would question Paul or even Peter but certainly not Jesus. I have had my own experience which tells me exactly how divine he truly is.
IDK if I have studied as much as you but I marvel at similarities between cultures which had no history of ever being in contact. For instance, the Orthodox Christians have a "40 day mass" for the dead. (Which in practice is usually performed a little more than 40 days after death but never before) and I have heard that the Tibetan Buddhists have a 49 day period after death, both of these periods have to do with the soul's journey after death to prepare for the next phase.
I've also thought of things like, since Abraham spoke a sematic and that the preface a' in those languages usually means 'of' or 'son of'. His name could have been: a'Braham and Brahan is very similar to Brahmin, which is the name of the highest god in the neighboring country (India) So it seems like there is some ancient connection between those 2 very different cultures.
Anyways, I'm just curious what else you may have noticed.
This is difficult to say. I could go through a list, but then I'd have to justify them, and that is a book length endeavor. In addition it would be largely speculative. I am constantly finding new evidence on these things that makes me lean one way or another. Not about everything, some are pretty clear cut, but some are so clouded in history, taking any sort of stand one way or the other seems foolish.
I have that sense as well. My research suggests there was a lot of controversy of ideas, a lot of debate. Constantine ended that debate by making specific tenets (some taken from other religions, like Mithraism) into Roman Law (believe these things or else!).
Those cultures had a lot of contact. The idea that there was no contact between East and West is a lie. Not only did they have contact (travel) between all those areas, their cultures were all founded (or subsumed) by the same group of people, the people we call the Scythians (or their progenitors).
The Scythians have been effectively removed from history, with nothing but lies, largely in the form of purposeful disconnections, left in its place. Until people understand who they were, it is impossible to understand the ancient world. You might know the Scythians as the Tartarians. They are the same group of people. People who look into Tartary are all forced to look into the wrong thing (giants, free energy, "Tartarians in America" and all that other bullshit). By keeping Tartary researchers focused on these mostly unrelated topics, it steers people away from that realization: Tartary was just Scythia, and Scythia ruled about 25% of the planet (approximately the area known as the USSR, though at times extending far beyond that) for 3000 to 5000 years.
Their removal from history in the early 20th century is, imo, the greatest scam of our Age, and likely the key to understanding everything.
What is the basis of Gnosticism, the Demiurge? While I agree that is a part of Gnostic teaching, the idea of a "demigod" (non-corporeal self-aware split apart from Source) that ruled the earth while pretending to be Source has origins that go back very far, thousands of years, long before there were people that call themselves "Gnostics," at least according to history.
What is how people are controlled?
I suggest that "naming" anything (in the way we do it) is a false naming in the sense that words have definitions, and definitions are always incomplete.
Not really. They use what I call The One religion, but a specific sect of it. The One religion is the only religion that actually exists, all other religions are front organizations that lead to that same religion in their occult mysteries. Whether any particular religion started as front organizations, or has been taken over to join them is difficult to say, but that seems to be how it is set up now, and has been for at least two millennia, though likely much longer.
The One religion teaches that "Thou art God" as one of it's primary tenets. Inherent in that tenet is the connectedness of all things. We are all God (Source), thus we are all created equally Divine, created from and inseparably connected to the Fundamental.
Some of the sects of The One religion teach a focus on the "self" aspect of that Divinity, teaching how to rise above the other split-aparts of Source (other people). It is this literally self centered aspect that sets apart the teachings of The One religion of the Cabal and The One religion of other adherents.
Gnosticism does not, at least on the surface, present itself as a self centered cult, it is merely part of The One religion, and that can be confusing at first. There are many similarities between these different sects. The primary difference is the focus on self, or the focus on the connectedness, and the intrinsic respect in that connection. In this other aspect, to respect others is to respect yourself, because everyone is fundamentally Source.
There's a great deal more to it than that. At some point I will write it up formally. It's pretty important to understand The One religion, and the differences in the various associated cults I think.