My A-Hole Congressman - weird timing, right?
- UKRAINE, ISRAEL SALT -
Maybe you are not grasping what has taken place.
This has nothing to do with who the speaker is, it has everything to do with 8 slipknots ousting a speaker without any plan for a replacement.
Isreal is at war and we can’t do anything because these clowns put zero thought into the potential consequences.
That is all
I'm unfamiliar with the part of the Constitution that states that no congressional activity can be performed without a "Speaker of the House". Please cite where that is a requirement. Thank you.
No business can proceed without a SOTH - that's why they had to keep voting until McCarthy eventually won back in Jan. because it was the start of a new Congress. House rules changed post 9/11 (2003, if I remember correctly what I read) - the new speaker then submits a secret list of his pro-tem replacements so that House business can proceed in the SOTH absence. House activity CAN be preformed because they DO have a SOTH in pro tem.
“McHenry’s authority is determined by House Rule I, Clause 8(b)(3), which was put in place in 2003 and which reads, in part:
In the case of a vacancy in the Office of Speaker, the next Member on the list described in subdivision (B) shall act as Speaker pro tempore until the election of a Speaker or a Speaker pro tempore. Pending such election the Member acting as Speaker pro tempore may exercise such authorities of the Office of Speaker as may be necessary and appropriate to that end.“
From someone who has an MS in FL 😊
I guess it's like Catholics and the Bible; the Bible is the Word of God, and Catholics let the writings of the Pope's determine their behavior :)
Thank you for citing the rule, not someone's opinion. I think you're misinterpreting the part that reads:
I’m looking but this Yahoo article alludes to it…
https://news.yahoo.com/rep-patrick-mchenry-appointed-speaker-001906082.html
It is in the House Rules, IIRC. I think I saw this from SharonSaysSo on Instagram or someone else who cited the sources. There is a difference in the power of an appointed Speaker Pro Tempore vs an elected one. The person who stated this showed the sources so I believe I am correct.
What I am trying to point out is that the Constitution states a very limited role of the speaker, and doesn't state that Congress can't operate without one. It seems that the Founders intended for a speaker to provide order to the proceedings, but not a requirement for votes on issues, other than impeachment, which is the only vote that DOES require a speaker. Any other "requirements" associated with a speaker are just things that have been informally adopted over the years. The House could vote on things, other than impeachment, without a SOH.
Since when does our government follow the Constitution? 🤷♀️
I got your point, but the House and Senate have their internal rules and until that system is blown up somehow, the rules will govern how the two bodies operate.