While I completely agree, and while everything you say is 100% true, I'm not sure I see that in this situation.
Sidney is simply making a business decision. Gamble $500k-$1m of a 50/50 guilty verdict or spend $2,700.00 on a sure thing. Not a hard decision.
BUT:
When she has to make the plea in court (I forget the name of this process) if I were her, I'd sure explain the blackmail that the prosecution is playing. I'd say that I do NOT enter this plea voluntarily, but rather that I was coerced and blackmailed by legal thuggery. But then again, that's the type of person I am.
People on the left have a strong tendency to favor collectivist ideals. They lack the ability to think for themselves, unlike individualists. It is in their nature to follow the herd, and stick together- it is no coincidence that people on the left are referred to as sheep by people on the right.
While this is true, Sidney is not a member of the politicians. She is an independent lawyer, not a staff or Trump lawyer. I'm confident she still supports and stands with Trump and MAGA. In this situation, (IMHO) she's making a business decision.
Thank you for the update.
People are making a big deal that she's testifying "against" Trump, when really she's just required to answer questions honestly. And if there were honestly no shenanigans, why are people suddenly labelling her a traitor?
I'm sure she didn't know the bigger picture Trump was playing. Trump needed the "pause" but he needed to at least show he was "trying" to contest the election. Sidney did the right thing, and she played her part perfectly. IMHO, her part is now complete. Same for Rudy, Linn, and others.
My explanation? I know multiple factions exist, and evil abhors sharing power.
There is also the element of chaos and disorder. two good options to keep things swhirlilng around so people cannot see what is really happening. A llittle power can go to weak minds very quickly.
Dems do not back Dems. They put on a good show, but Democrats are just as fickle as Republicans.
There's only one moral side to take in war and that is the side of freedom. Genuine, standing up for people's right to decide their lives for themselves, freedom.
Not only that, but something we have NOT learned, is to stick together.
Dems back dems back dems back dems. Stay in lock step and NEVER back down. Except for the sacrificial lambs, of course.
What do we do? One whiff of a contrary opinion and they are dropped in the cold. Not in the plan? Dropped. Fend for your self.
Not always done this way, but often enough, it sucks.
While I completely agree, and while everything you say is 100% true, I'm not sure I see that in this situation.
Sidney is simply making a business decision. Gamble $500k-$1m of a 50/50 guilty verdict or spend $2,700.00 on a sure thing. Not a hard decision.
BUT: When she has to make the plea in court (I forget the name of this process) if I were her, I'd sure explain the blackmail that the prosecution is playing. I'd say that I do NOT enter this plea voluntarily, but rather that I was coerced and blackmailed by legal thuggery. But then again, that's the type of person I am.
I agree with you and that is great clarification. Thank you.
That would most certainly violate the terms of her deal.
People on the left have a strong tendency to favor collectivist ideals. They lack the ability to think for themselves, unlike individualists. It is in their nature to follow the herd, and stick together- it is no coincidence that people on the left are referred to as sheep by people on the right.
What about rfk Jr? The squad? Dems saying Biden is too old?
While this is true, Sidney is not a member of the politicians. She is an independent lawyer, not a staff or Trump lawyer. I'm confident she still supports and stands with Trump and MAGA. In this situation, (IMHO) she's making a business decision. Thank you for the update.
I'm with you on this.
People are making a big deal that she's testifying "against" Trump, when really she's just required to answer questions honestly. And if there were honestly no shenanigans, why are people suddenly labelling her a traitor?
I'm sure she didn't know the bigger picture Trump was playing. Trump needed the "pause" but he needed to at least show he was "trying" to contest the election. Sidney did the right thing, and she played her part perfectly. IMHO, her part is now complete. Same for Rudy, Linn, and others.
I'm not sure I understand how this is relevant to this topic.
I updated my comment to clarify which part I was responding to
My explanation? I know multiple factions exist, and evil abhors sharing power.
There is also the element of chaos and disorder. two good options to keep things swhirlilng around so people cannot see what is really happening. A llittle power can go to weak minds very quickly.
Dems do not back Dems. They put on a good show, but Democrats are just as fickle as Republicans.
There's only one moral side to take in war and that is the side of freedom. Genuine, standing up for people's right to decide their lives for themselves, freedom.