among prominent contrarians on scientific consensus
Because "scientific consensus", like "conspiracy theory", is a bullshit term invented to shut off analytical thought.
Consensus is a MARKETING word. Follow the money.
Science itself doesn't give a slippery shit about what "most scientists" say.
It relentlessly challenges the status quo, ever seeking to poke holes in sacred-cow theories and to disprove hypotheses.
Science is never settled. There is never and will never be a consensus. If fifty thousand scientists say humans control the earth's weather instead of the sun and oceans, then fifty thousand scientists are wrong (and probably lying to get rich).
Because "scientific consensus", like "conspiracy theory", is a bullshit term invented to shut off analytical thought.
Consensus is a MARKETING word. Follow the money.
Science itself doesn't give a slippery shit about what "most scientists" say.
It relentlessly challenges the status quo, ever seeking to poke holes in sacred-cow theories and to disprove hypotheses.
Science is never settled. There is never and will never be a consensus. If fifty thousand scientists say humans control the earth's weather instead of the sun and oceans, then fifty thousand scientists are wrong (and probably lying to get rich).
Did you hear that, Neil DeGrasse Tyson?
Absolutely right on.
He contradicted the overwhelming scientific consensus. Like science needs a majority rule.
Whats more important is he got the Nobel prize in 2022, according to this article.
So the Nobel committee is no longer in the Cabal control?
Bring it and sign it loud and wide!!
Climate Science cannot be science.
Science demands variables that are the same… the planet is ever changing and can’t ever be the same set of variables.
Test those set of same variables… cannot happen as we don’t have the same data set.
Can’t be science…