"QA" and "QAnon" are wrapped in apostrophes; most (all?) references to "QAnon" are wrapped in either quotation marks or apostrophes, and most references to straight Q are not.
Perhaps it's saying that narratively, they went from calling Q "QA" to "QAnon"? Hammer not being wrapped in apostrophes definitely means something there too, but this has probably been talked about.
I get the “disinformation is necessary” part, but in this instance, Q actually CONTRADICTS what Q said in another post (that there is no “QAnon”). It didn’t pop into my head till this ‘hammer Santa’ post was brought back up.
I didn’t downvote it. My comment was that the Q post with the hammer-holding Santa using the word “QAnon” and the painting being signed “QA” (abbreviation for “QAnon”) contradicts Q’s other post that clarified “There is no QAnon - there is Q and there are Anons - no “QAnon.”
That’s all I was saying. Q contradicted themselves re: those 2 posts. In one post, Q is validating “QAnon” as being a thing and another Q post they denied “QAnon” as being a thing. Simple fact - not a theory or interpretation. It is what it is.
Just search the Q board for the term “QAnon” and you can see the contradicting Q posts. One of the 2 (the hammer-holding Santa) is already posted in this thread.
Odd that Q later said, “There is no QAnon” (only “Q” and “Anons”), yet Q uses that reference “QAnon” by name here in this post.
Perhaps there is a misinterpretation here.
"QA" and "QAnon" are wrapped in apostrophes; most (all?) references to "QAnon" are wrapped in either quotation marks or apostrophes, and most references to straight Q are not.
Perhaps it's saying that narratively, they went from calling Q "QA" to "QAnon"? Hammer not being wrapped in apostrophes definitely means something there too, but this has probably been talked about.
Good points - thanks for your input on that. Wishing you a blessed Thanksgiving with your loved ones!
You as well! Also I'm not saying I'm right by any means, just that it may not be a "disinformation is necessary" thing nor a contradiction haha
Disinformation is necessary. Don’t ever take Q completely at its word. Let it make you hypothesize and research.
I get the “disinformation is necessary” part, but in this instance, Q actually CONTRADICTS what Q said in another post (that there is no “QAnon”). It didn’t pop into my head till this ‘hammer Santa’ post was brought back up.
I hate when questions get downvoted but let’s play with the Socratic method.
How did Q contradict himself.
When did he say there is a QAnon, and is that what they said or is that your interpretation of what was said.
I didn’t downvote it. My comment was that the Q post with the hammer-holding Santa using the word “QAnon” and the painting being signed “QA” (abbreviation for “QAnon”) contradicts Q’s other post that clarified “There is no QAnon - there is Q and there are Anons - no “QAnon.”
That’s all I was saying. Q contradicted themselves re: those 2 posts. In one post, Q is validating “QAnon” as being a thing and another Q post they denied “QAnon” as being a thing. Simple fact - not a theory or interpretation. It is what it is.
Just search the Q board for the term “QAnon” and you can see the contradicting Q posts. One of the 2 (the hammer-holding Santa) is already posted in this thread.