But I'm not really convinced by the whole "If you take this word and add missing letters, and rearrange them, then it spells this other word!" You could do that with thousands of words to make them say whatever you want.
Except they did it on purpose with Comey / Corney, so the precedent is set which lends some validity to this particular instance. But I agree, we should always exercise discernment!
True, but that makes sense in the context of OCR (Optical Character Recognition), you can visually see how that would be the case, and would provide cover saying it was just an OCR error.
Polsi to Pelosi, I'm not seeing that. That is all I am saying. Not saying it's nothing, just that it's not very convincing to me.
And just to clarify what I mean by "You can visually see how that would be the case":
I mean the letters "rn" is very close to "m" in terms of OCR. You can easily see how an OCR system could misread "rn" as "m". Then even if that was done on purpose you could just say "The OCR system messed up"
Don't forget the world is composed of many lazy and thick people who just cannot bother to spell words correctly. Or for that matter to exercise any care whatsoever in their written communications. They don't know how to spell Pelosi but Polsi sounds sort of OK to them and as far as they are concerned it does the job.
So I'd definitely recommend reading the original thread this refers to: https://greatawakening.win/p/17rmEoyIar/an-interesting-and-long-x-thread/c/ Super interesting!
But I'm not really convinced by the whole "If you take this word and add missing letters, and rearrange them, then it spells this other word!" You could do that with thousands of words to make them say whatever you want.
Except they did it on purpose with Comey / Corney, so the precedent is set which lends some validity to this particular instance. But I agree, we should always exercise discernment!
True, but that makes sense in the context of OCR (Optical Character Recognition), you can visually see how that would be the case, and would provide cover saying it was just an OCR error.
Polsi to Pelosi, I'm not seeing that. That is all I am saying. Not saying it's nothing, just that it's not very convincing to me.
And just to clarify what I mean by "You can visually see how that would be the case":
I mean the letters "rn" is very close to "m" in terms of OCR. You can easily see how an OCR system could misread "rn" as "m". Then even if that was done on purpose you could just say "The OCR system messed up"
Except the misspellings could only refer to Nancy, i.e., speaker of the house.
That was my thought at first too, but the numerous examples of Pelosi being misspelled Polsi is very compelling IMO.
Don't forget the world is composed of many lazy and thick people who just cannot bother to spell words correctly. Or for that matter to exercise any care whatsoever in their written communications. They don't know how to spell Pelosi but Polsi sounds sort of OK to them and as far as they are concerned it does the job.
Yes, remember when Hillary's minions were spelling Libya as Libia.
Santa & Satan ?
The two cases of "misspellings" are very different.
Corney was an attempt to hide his real name in database searches.
Pelosi is probably a pseudonym she used to hide her true origins - I am guessing her official name is Polsi