The U.S. has put sanctions on other countries for doing exactly what the Colorado Supreme Court has done today.
(www.dailysignal.com)
'DO AS WE SAY- NOT AS WE DO!'
Comments (22)
sorted by:
They have removed Trump from the ballot because he directed an insurrection
I don't think [they] have the real authority anyway. Albeit painful for us, we are just watching this play out in slow-mo to wake the larger population.
Yes. And giving everyone a lesson on the importance of the Constitution and our rights.
This angle I haven't seen. Can you elaborate?
Thx
as someone who has been calling it correctly since Jan 6, i would also like to know more.
Ive been saying since day 1 they will use 14th amendment, which is why they kept saying “insurection, insurection, insurection”
Only a President can declare a insurrection and there is a laid out constitutional process for that... now I have to re-find where I read that.
The Insurrection Act of 1807 is a United States federal law[1] that empowers the president of the United States to deploy U.S. military and federalized National Guard troops within the United States in particular circumstances, such as to suppress civil disorder, insurrection, or rebellion.
The act provides a “statutory exception” to the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which limits the use of military personnel under federal command for law enforcement purposes within the United States.[2][3]
Before invoking the powers under the Act, 10 U.S.C. § 254 requires the President to first publish a proclamation ordering the insurgents to disperse. As part of the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, these provisions have since been amended.
A presidential proclamation is a statement issued by a US president on an issue of public policy and is a type of presidential directive. ]
A presidential proclamation is an instrument that:
states a condition, declares a law and requires obedience, recognizes an event, or triggers the implementation of a law, by recognizing that the circumstances described in the law have been realized.[1]
This was all cited with links https://x22report.com/the-real-insurrectionist-are-now-being-exposed-nobody-is-above-the-law-ep-3241/ ... scroll down... I hate that links get lost with a cut and paste on this win site but not most others...
Rich Baris "The People's Pundit" @Peoples_Pundit · Dec 20 But just to be clear, you don't believe in due process outlined in the 14th Amendment, and you don't acknowledge the fact it omits the Office of the President, and you don't acknowledge the part where the President is the only one who declares an "insurrection" etc. etc. etc. wmcgurn @wmcgurn1959 ~ Congress amended section 3 of the 14th Amendment twice: 1870 & 1948 to show the Judicial branch how it was to be applied. "1948: Congress replaced the 1870 statute with a criminal insurrection law, 18 U.S.C. § 2383. If convicted under that statute -- with full criminal due process afforded the defendant -- one of the punishments is to be banned from holding office in the United States. Trump has not been charged under this statute."
https://twitter.com/wmcgurn1959/status/1737856755047305531
An amicus brief https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-624/293864/20231220140217967_US%20v.%20Trump%20amicus%20final.pdf has been filed in the SCOTUS by former Attorney General Ed Meese (under Ronald Reagan), and two constitutional law professors, Steven Calabresi and Gary S. Lawson, challenging the legality altogether of Jack Smith’s appointment as special counsel for prosecuting Mr. Trump. The amicus is filed in the matter of Jack Smith’s certiorari petition to the court to schedule Mr. Trump’s DC trial the same day as the Super Tuesday primary —against the defendant’s objections. The amicus presents compelling arguments that Attorney General Merrick Garland acted illegally in appointing Mr. Smith, and if SCOTUS chucks him out of the special counsel job, the whole mendaciously constructed scaffold of the Jan 6 prosecution goes out the window, along with the Mar-a-Lago documents case.
I love the mendaciously constructed scaffold going out the window part.
That's what trump did.
We will win our rule of law countries back!!
FASCISM: Democrats in Four States Including Florida, Tennessee, North Carolina, and Massachusetts Decide to Have Only Joe Biden on the Primary Ballot
Four states—Florida, Tennessee, North Carolina, and Massachusetts—have decided to force voters with a single option for the Democratic primaries: Joe Biden. The decision, which effectively crowns Joe Biden as the Democratic nominee in those states without primary contestation, has incited allegations of disenfranchisement and questions about the democratic process within the party. The true threat to the demise of our democracy lies with the Democrats, not Donald Trump. The communist party will now decide the Democratic Party’s nominee and who they install into the White House. Source: thegatewaypundit.com
Spreading like the horrendous disease that it is
It's not a vote if there is only one corrupt option.
From August 2021 new York examiner:
"FBI confirms there was no insurrection on Jan. 6"
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/fbi-confirms-there-was-no-insurrection-on-january-6
So what are we doing here???
Sadly, how will the dictatorships of Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua end, if America does the same, acting as a dictatorship.
We’re already there in many respects.
As Bruce Willis would say after tossing a dead body ducktaped to an office chair off the 70th floor of Nakitomi Plaza - “Welcome to the party pal..!”
The left loves to go through the motions and get the media to pretend there is substance. They did the same when they said biden was elected and they all just pretended it was true.
Maybe Russia and Iran are not the boogie man!
Maybe Russia and Iran are not the boogie man!
we have also sanctioned other countries for the irregularities that occurred in nov 2020