Not true, a pole mounted gimble can be as short as needed so the camera can “swing” free of the object that it’s attached to. The reason this looks so odd to people is because it’s a relatively new filming style. Tom Cruise likes to use this style a lot lately in his Mission Impossible movies.
So the reason we should think it's real is because Tom cruise likes it in graphics heavy MOVIE shoots....that's awesome thinking. Thanks for the chuckle, made my day.
As a person who has recorded over 100+ hours of Insta360 footage I can tell this is 360 degree camera footage. The camera image is stabilized based on horizon which is why it looks unnaturally smooth. You can see on the footage from the mans perspective that the outside lens is scratched and the scratch jumps around but the digital video stabilization keeps the image from shaking.
Honestly the footage looks like a video game which is half the fun of these videos, for instance check this video out
If that's where a camera was mounted it would move in relation to the rear end of the helo. It clearly does not. The gopro doesn't adjust that much to 10-20 feet of swaying to stabilize a video.
What about the zooming in as they move into the cabin or the smooth filming throughout?
Not in jet engine exhaust, rotor wash and tail rotor vibration. I have nothing else to learn about those forces. Where they fucked up: there can be sensors hard-mounted to the fuselage, but they don't sway back, forth, up and down like that. If the sensor was free to sway, or on a drone, it would be an absolute mess. If the engines and rotor weren't producing enough force to knock the hell out of that device, the aircraft would fall out of the sky. Also, pausing the video and zooming on the main rotor reveals motion blur against the rotor's direction of travel.👎
They have a very lightweight gimble mount that can be attached to a backpack or fixed to any surface and “float it off” i.e., the camera is always level to the horizon as the vehicle or person moves. Giving the steady motion so people don’t get sick while watching the footage. I do this for a living in Hollywierd.
The footage itself may be “staged” fake, but this isn’t video game CGI animation. These are real people and vehicles being filmed with very wide GoPro style fisheye lenses. *these GoPros even have internal software that digitally erases the gimble arm as it’s recording so you won’t see the shadow of the arm on any background.
Then it should be in the same position all the time, while it seems to move as it was an independent drone following the helicopter which wouldn’t be possible because of the wind from the helicopter which would blow the drone out.
That's way fake. Who is filming the helicopter as it flies in, lol. I've seen more realistic looking stuff in some of the memes posted here.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that is the cleanest cargo ship in existence. There are cruise ships that aren't that clean.
The horizon is steady the whole time LOL
Gopro mounted to the tail? Would mean attackers leaked footage
Yeah, modern gopros can keep the horizon stable in frame easily.
if the camera was really on the tail of the helicopter it would remain stationary relative to the helicopter.
thats true
Not true, a pole mounted gimble can be as short as needed so the camera can “swing” free of the object that it’s attached to. The reason this looks so odd to people is because it’s a relatively new filming style. Tom Cruise likes to use this style a lot lately in his Mission Impossible movies.
So the reason we should think it's real is because Tom cruise likes it in graphics heavy MOVIE shoots....that's awesome thinking. Thanks for the chuckle, made my day.
As a person who has recorded over 100+ hours of Insta360 footage I can tell this is 360 degree camera footage. The camera image is stabilized based on horizon which is why it looks unnaturally smooth. You can see on the footage from the mans perspective that the outside lens is scratched and the scratch jumps around but the digital video stabilization keeps the image from shaking.
Honestly the footage looks like a video game which is half the fun of these videos, for instance check this video out
https://yewtu.be/watch?v=l-Xy4yRsAcM
0:26 you can see man on right with 360 camera mounted
0:31 you can see 360 camera mounted to tail of helicopter
I also have insta360. Thank you for writing this up this is all exactly what I wanted to say.
Theres a lot of amazing features, so many that I have discontinued using it (for now). That being said, this may still be a false flag.
Yup, agree 100%
Insta360 user here too, plus GoPro, etc.
So they took the time to remove it after they all hopped out? It's not there when the helo flys off... "cover me, I've got to grab the go pro"
0:26 you can see man on right with 360 camera mounted
0:31 you can see 360 camera mounted to tail of helicopter
If that's where a camera was mounted it would move in relation to the rear end of the helo. It clearly does not. The gopro doesn't adjust that much to 10-20 feet of swaying to stabilize a video. What about the zooming in as they move into the cabin or the smooth filming throughout?
You can be as condescending as you want but it's still fake.
0:26 you can see man on right with 360 camera mounted
0:31 you can see 360 camera mounted to tail of helicopter
I saw Sonja whip Sub-Zero's ass once in a video. It was real too in its own way.
With those railings, there is no way a helicoptor pilot would immediately bank on takeoff. If one of the wheels caught a railing that bird is down.
lol Yea, and there are no forces at all underneath a tail rotor. 😉
you guys have much to learn, i believe go pros stabilize the camera so it doesnt shake or w/e that is why the horizon stays the same. imo
Not in jet engine exhaust, rotor wash and tail rotor vibration. I have nothing else to learn about those forces. Where they fucked up: there can be sensors hard-mounted to the fuselage, but they don't sway back, forth, up and down like that. If the sensor was free to sway, or on a drone, it would be an absolute mess. If the engines and rotor weren't producing enough force to knock the hell out of that device, the aircraft would fall out of the sky. Also, pausing the video and zooming on the main rotor reveals motion blur against the rotor's direction of travel.👎
They have a very lightweight gimble mount that can be attached to a backpack or fixed to any surface and “float it off” i.e., the camera is always level to the horizon as the vehicle or person moves. Giving the steady motion so people don’t get sick while watching the footage. I do this for a living in Hollywierd.
The footage itself may be “staged” fake, but this isn’t video game CGI animation. These are real people and vehicles being filmed with very wide GoPro style fisheye lenses. *these GoPros even have internal software that digitally erases the gimble arm as it’s recording so you won’t see the shadow of the arm on any background.
Bingo. I had the same thoughts.
We have much to learn but you say here you don't know for sure what you are seeing?
OK. Sure.
what I mean is I am always open to the possibility that i could be wrong. :)
So fake AND GHEY
A remote cam on the tail.
Then it should be in the same position all the time, while it seems to move as it was an independent drone following the helicopter which wouldn’t be possible because of the wind from the helicopter which would blow the drone out.
You are right, a drone that close to the tail rotor, I wouldn't fly in that if my tail rotor was compromised that badly.
Reminds me of the moon landing
Stabilized GoPro footage.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJrdxC1oYY0
I work in video, this footage looks real to me.