Most people can only think of a few taxes they pay, did you know its above 97?
(paradigmlife.net)
🔍 Notable Tax Truths 🇺🇸
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (61)
sorted by:
Ever check out the Constitution to see which taxes are allowable by law (the Constitution is the Supreme law of the land) and which should never have been enacted. (Enacted illegally, as any 'law' that is repugnant to the Constitution is unconstitutional and therefore, illegal. Check it out.
I wonder what the AI's say about that.
Don’t even mention that satanic entity here please. It is scary.
As useful as that information is, don’t bring that judicial stuff into an administrative court. Hold your own court and force them to present a verifiable bill.
E: this works with traffic court too.
Yeah. yeah I do. It's not a hard document to read. More folks on this board need to actually crack one open.
Article I, Section 8:
It's pretty broad. The 16th Amendment also gives congress the power to tax Income.
To start, notice the year that was enacted? It never should have happened in the first place and goes hand and hand with the creation of the Fed. It was completely against the original, natural Constitution. The feds were supposed to collect taxes via levies on imports and exports. In other words, Americans were supposed to keep their own 'wealth' and run the country on the backs of other countries.
I mean - could the same be said about every Amendment. the 'original, natural (whatever that means) Constitution' said nothing about freedom of speech, or religion, or assembly, the right to bare arms, etc.
It was proposed in 1909, and then ratified in 1913 (which yes is when the Fed was created)
Yeah and Wisconsin beat the Feds by 2 years and enacted the first state income tax in 1911.
Makes that "all roads go to racine" even more interesting.
I think gobby in referring to the act of 1871. When this is reversed, which I believe the corporation was bankrupted in 2019 then this would nullify all Amendments after 1871. https://www.qwant.com/?hc=0&vt=1&q=act+of+1871+america+the+corporation&origin=suggest&t=web
Well, that's where they'll argue literal modern day welfare. I am sure that has already been pointed to as to why taxpayers have to fund welfare, by some politician somewhere.
As a Constitutionalist, it's a neat document but boy is there a lot to criticize after how much of it has been subverted.
Some could argue that amendments really should have stopped at the mark of ten.
For sure. it's too broad and has never been fettered. General welfare could mean anything unfortunately.
I don't think I agree with you on everything after 10 though. you leave out some good ones:
Can't wait for some old boys to downvote because I think 13 and 19 are good things ;)
Slavery didn't make much sense under the Constitution anyway, as it guaranteed every man here was equal to each other and free.
By virtue alone, slavery should have been abolished. However, I am starting to believe that they should have sent the slaves back -- even after being integrated into society, the people today who are no more slaves than anyone else now point to the past for all of their problems and failures and use it to justify attacking us. Even as their own forebears had such wonderful culture that so many have tossed aside.
I don't agree with limiting a President to two terms as it was essentially a shackle on the Presidency due to Congress who currently enjoy zero term limits themselves not liking their own lack of control.
As for the 19th, prior to the 19th amendment there was no Constitutional requirement that voters strictly be male, instead it was a losing social issue that likely was on its way to being corrected without an amendment on its own due to how the Constitution is amended in the first place.
In regards to other things, there are positives and negatives that have occurred and it's difficult to say where we'd be today had they not. I don't necessarily agree that we should have stopped by the tenth amendment, but rather I am understanding why people believe we should have.
"Welfare" is of course just playing word games as it wasn't in the spirit of the original use to give federal funds to private citizens in perpetuity.
Imo, election of senators should have stayed with the states. Currently more state legislatures are majority republican and naturally would have voted for republican senators. We could have had a super majority in the senate had they not monkeyed around with that.
Here’s the trick:
Define “income” using the tax code.
https://files.catbox.moe/1312fu.jpeg
I mean, the 16th Amendment made it very broad "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived..."
You missed the point. The entire meaning of that statement depends on what “income” means.
It does not mean, legally, what we use it to mean colloquially, and that is by design.
Exactly. What did the patriots of this country fight for on July 4th 1776? For nothing? We have to pay taxes even to go 💩. These monsters create all the revolutions and wars, destroy history at the same time houses etc. to rebuild again for us to continue paying taxes and more taxes. We are paying money to them. Slavery.