“Income” is both a legal term and a communicative word used in everyday speech.

Double meanings exist.

They define it to mean one thing legally in statutory codes, then get us to use it another way in everyday speech.

According to everyday speech, when they accuse us of having made “income”, we totally did, so nobody gives it a second thought.

What if the statutory definition of “income” meant something else, and The Adversary was just accusing us of things, though?

In order for government actions to be lawful, they have to either be inherently lawful actions, or be delegated from the people.

How did you delegate your authority to take money from your neighbor to the government?

What is “income”, in the legal statutory code?

I didn’t see this response after the troll’s comments. Sorry.