Probably some of the reluctance to talk about this type of timeline is because there have been many "die off" timelines discussed previously that didn't quite pan out the way they were stated. I'm not suggesting they aren't correct just answering your question with my perspective.
Because there will be no mass die off event. The suddenlies have already happened. If everyone who got the shot is supposed to die, then the cabal has already won, and the Great Awakening serves no purpose, because those who need to be awakened will have already died.
What is strange to me is that a lot of us here are proponents of natural healthcare, and believe in the body given to us and designed by God. Is it outside of the realm of possibility that our bodies are able to fight off the toxins that were put into these vaccines?
This is not to say that people didn't die from the jab, because they most certainly did. However, not in the numbers that were theorized here or elsewhere. If the vaccine was going to kill you, it already has.
Don't get me wrong, I tend to learn towards inflicting long term health issues that will slowly reduce the populous while maintaining the guise of Naturally occurring diseases. At this point I'm just observing the quality of the health of those who Jabbed, rabidly Jabbed, and those who did not. As for these type of claims I am willing to listen to the information and dedicate some memory towards it but thats where I leave it until I have confirmation from my vantage point.
All the doctors I have heard warn about deaths have said between 3 and 5 years after the shots. We are just now coming up to three years since the first round of shots was available, and as you might remember, not everybody was 'eligible.' It took months for everybody who wanted one to get their first shot. So we are in the very early stages of that 3-5 year window. Somehow, I don't think he's right. I don't think we'll see millions die off shortly. I don't know why I believe that, I just do. Perhaps it's wishful thinking.
The account that shared rhe vid and of a female Arizona research Dr (I don't recall if it was tenpenny or someone else) that said all MRNA based shots killed 100% of their rabbits the following cycle (ie the next round of the virus that was introduced).
IF there is any credibility to that research claim (IIRC about 10 before the Covid Shots were pushed), then we should have seen many more deaths the year following everyone being coerced to take the shots. Maybe the biotech was refined, maybe the shots were not stored cold enough & maybe there are many doctors who simply gave saline & didn't say any differently.
I just don't see a pathway for a sudden die off this year unless there is some other data that we haven't been offered yet.
Could it happen? Sure. Though I just don't see the mechanism to compel everyone who took the shot to suddenly start dying. Rather I figure that death rates will climb & it will never be blamed on the shots if things go as they historically did.
I remember Dr. Malone said mRNA is extremely expensive and unlikely to be in billions of shots. Also there was an article (don't know where to retrieve it) that said there was no biological material in thousands of vaccines tested. That means no RNA and no spike proteins, Just graphene oxides, heavy metals, etc.
That's right. It came down to logistics IIRC, there wasn't enough time to get these ready even if they had started working on it for. A year before COVID was announced. I need to look & see if the posts from guys who claimed to be logistics professionals posts are still around. It made sense when we thought about how many hours it would take to make these shots & then get them delivered properly.
If the pharma companies didn't have them ready, but the competitors would lie & get paid to sell saline, then they too needed to do it so they didn't miss out on government money. The idea was proposed that the boosters would contain more of the spike protien stuff because there was more time to get those produced. This was the theroy running around IIRC.
I believe rabbits versus human years are also a part of the equation. Just as in mice. Labs have specific timelines for this, monkeys also have a different years in time although much closer to humans.
Probably some of the reluctance to talk about this type of timeline is because there have been many "die off" timelines discussed previously that didn't quite pan out the way they were stated. I'm not suggesting they aren't correct just answering your question with my perspective.
Because there will be no mass die off event. The suddenlies have already happened. If everyone who got the shot is supposed to die, then the cabal has already won, and the Great Awakening serves no purpose, because those who need to be awakened will have already died.
What is strange to me is that a lot of us here are proponents of natural healthcare, and believe in the body given to us and designed by God. Is it outside of the realm of possibility that our bodies are able to fight off the toxins that were put into these vaccines?
This is not to say that people didn't die from the jab, because they most certainly did. However, not in the numbers that were theorized here or elsewhere. If the vaccine was going to kill you, it already has.
U srs?
Myocarditis takes years to kill. Cancer takes years to grow. Etc.
Don't get me wrong, I tend to learn towards inflicting long term health issues that will slowly reduce the populous while maintaining the guise of Naturally occurring diseases. At this point I'm just observing the quality of the health of those who Jabbed, rabidly Jabbed, and those who did not. As for these type of claims I am willing to listen to the information and dedicate some memory towards it but thats where I leave it until I have confirmation from my vantage point.
Chances of myocarditis increase 10% a year. So we’re going cumulative with the death numbers going into 2030.
Source? I've only heard that the risk of myocarditis goes up with each booster, not over time if you never take another jab.
Dr Peter McCullough. Cant remember when. He’s one of the top research cardiologist in the world. Expert in myocarditis. He stated this 2021.
All the doctors I have heard warn about deaths have said between 3 and 5 years after the shots. We are just now coming up to three years since the first round of shots was available, and as you might remember, not everybody was 'eligible.' It took months for everybody who wanted one to get their first shot. So we are in the very early stages of that 3-5 year window. Somehow, I don't think he's right. I don't think we'll see millions die off shortly. I don't know why I believe that, I just do. Perhaps it's wishful thinking.
Has. I agree with you, but you can also never be sure of long term effects until time passes, and by then it could be hard to link it unfortunately
The account that shared rhe vid and of a female Arizona research Dr (I don't recall if it was tenpenny or someone else) that said all MRNA based shots killed 100% of their rabbits the following cycle (ie the next round of the virus that was introduced).
IF there is any credibility to that research claim (IIRC about 10 before the Covid Shots were pushed), then we should have seen many more deaths the year following everyone being coerced to take the shots. Maybe the biotech was refined, maybe the shots were not stored cold enough & maybe there are many doctors who simply gave saline & didn't say any differently.
I just don't see a pathway for a sudden die off this year unless there is some other data that we haven't been offered yet.
Could it happen? Sure. Though I just don't see the mechanism to compel everyone who took the shot to suddenly start dying. Rather I figure that death rates will climb & it will never be blamed on the shots if things go as they historically did.
I remember Dr. Malone said mRNA is extremely expensive and unlikely to be in billions of shots. Also there was an article (don't know where to retrieve it) that said there was no biological material in thousands of vaccines tested. That means no RNA and no spike proteins, Just graphene oxides, heavy metals, etc.
That's right. It came down to logistics IIRC, there wasn't enough time to get these ready even if they had started working on it for. A year before COVID was announced. I need to look & see if the posts from guys who claimed to be logistics professionals posts are still around. It made sense when we thought about how many hours it would take to make these shots & then get them delivered properly.
If the pharma companies didn't have them ready, but the competitors would lie & get paid to sell saline, then they too needed to do it so they didn't miss out on government money. The idea was proposed that the boosters would contain more of the spike protien stuff because there was more time to get those produced. This was the theroy running around IIRC.
I think that is a very well articulated and concise response to the "die off" proponents.
I believe rabbits versus human years are also a part of the equation. Just as in mice. Labs have specific timelines for this, monkeys also have a different years in time although much closer to humans.
That is true, and I really don't have any recollection of how much time passed on rabbits if any at all was discussed.