We have no justice system anymore as it is beyond corrupt when they actually pass a law to get at President Trump. It is just sickening to see this woman lie and get away with it.
I agree. If we didn't see it with our own eyes we wouldn't have believed how corrupt our judicial branch is. I guess that's the idea. To show us how captured the system is.
A lot of us knew the judicial system was corrupt but we didn't know how bad. Now we are seeing it in real time. And a lot of people are seeing it. Timing is everything. Trust the plan. This is about the great awakening. Trump can't do this alone. The people must be behind him fully knowledgeable of what the stakes are imho.
God Bless President Donald Trump, his wife, family, legal team, friends, Q followers, the Voters that support Trump, the Military that supports the Constitution and Trump, Law Enforcement that too supports the Constitution and Trump, most of all Trumps security team and their families too, God Bless America, Bless the missing children and you the reader Too.🙏
Doesn’t this violate the ex post facto provisions of the Constitution? A person cannot be tried for something that was not a crime when the act was committed. And, even if it was a crime, aren’t they subject to the laws at the time the crime was allegedly committed?
Edit: This “look back” law is a thinly veiled extension of the statute of limitations. Changes to statute of limitations are subject to the ex post facto provisions of the Constitution. But, to my knowledge President Trump’s team never argued this.
I think they were going for a much larger objective; demonstrating we no longer have properly functioning civilian courts.
An old Supreme Court case from 1798 (Calder v. Bull) held that the Ex Post Facto Clause only apply to criminal, not civil cases. While we may think the outcome was outrageously criminal, the issue was a civil lawsuit.
Thank you, I wasn’t aware of that. The problem here is the State is clearly using the civil courts as a criminal court proxy. The Letitia James case is in civil court because she knows it would never make it through criminal court.
The Carrol case is similar in nature, look at the first trial where the jury actually issued a verdict regarding if a rape took place.
I’m in no way a legal scholar, but it seems to me when civil courts are meting out punishment in the way of punitive damages they are acting as a de facto criminal proceeding.
There are six things that the Lord hates, seven that are an abomination to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that make haste to run to evil, a false witness who breathes out lies, and one who sows discord among brothers
We have no justice system anymore as it is beyond corrupt when they actually pass a law to get at President Trump. It is just sickening to see this woman lie and get away with it.
I agree. If we didn't see it with our own eyes we wouldn't have believed how corrupt our judicial branch is. I guess that's the idea. To show us how captured the system is.
some things are just the other side doing what they do. i am so tired of reading "oh i guess this is so we can see how bad it is".
Well did you know it was this bad 7 years ago?
A lot of us knew the judicial system was corrupt but we didn't know how bad. Now we are seeing it in real time. And a lot of people are seeing it. Timing is everything. Trust the plan. This is about the great awakening. Trump can't do this alone. The people must be behind him fully knowledgeable of what the stakes are imho.
God Bless President Donald Trump, his wife, family, legal team, friends, Q followers, the Voters that support Trump, the Military that supports the Constitution and Trump, Law Enforcement that too supports the Constitution and Trump, most of all Trumps security team and their families too, God Bless America, Bless the missing children and you the reader Too.🙏
She and the judge won't get away with it that I'm very confident of. Let it play out, normies need to see the injustice.
From your lips to God's ears, please let it be true.
Jean carroll raped me
Me too....
Me three!
You poor people! The rape must have emotionally damaging. Sue her! I was emotionally damaged with the verdict. Send me my cut.
Move to NY and have at it! 👍
If I moved to NY I'd have to be as crazy as she is.
Ok, only 1/2 as crazy......
Lol, im a white guy, so that by default makes me her rapist in ny.
Don't go into ny, period.
Doesn’t this violate the ex post facto provisions of the Constitution? A person cannot be tried for something that was not a crime when the act was committed. And, even if it was a crime, aren’t they subject to the laws at the time the crime was allegedly committed?
Edit: This “look back” law is a thinly veiled extension of the statute of limitations. Changes to statute of limitations are subject to the ex post facto provisions of the Constitution. But, to my knowledge President Trump’s team never argued this.
I think they were going for a much larger objective; demonstrating we no longer have properly functioning civilian courts.
An old Supreme Court case from 1798 (Calder v. Bull) held that the Ex Post Facto Clause only apply to criminal, not civil cases. While we may think the outcome was outrageously criminal, the issue was a civil lawsuit.
Thank you, I wasn’t aware of that. The problem here is the State is clearly using the civil courts as a criminal court proxy. The Letitia James case is in civil court because she knows it would never make it through criminal court.
The Carrol case is similar in nature, look at the first trial where the jury actually issued a verdict regarding if a rape took place.
I’m in no way a legal scholar, but it seems to me when civil courts are meting out punishment in the way of punitive damages they are acting as a de facto criminal proceeding.
i ALWAYS love the replies that some bring to the table concerning the Law of OUR Land and you have elucidated quite well what I have been thinking...
Thank you for such a succinct reply and Case...
This was about her sueing him because he "defamed" her.... Not about the "rape"... That she fantasized about...
But, if the original event never happened and it was past the statute of limitations anyway, how can there be defamation?
Bingo.
She defamed him
Yes. It's the old inversion game.
They love moving the goal posts don't they...
That's exactly how they roll.
this sicko assulted my eyes every time i saw her
She doesnt look well. Cant quite put my finger on it.
It's also why some celebrities were accused at the end of 2023.
**TALK ABOUT "COMPLICIT"...WTH? **🔥😡🔥
What goes around will come around. Watch out, anyone can use this law.
Proverbs 6:16-19
There are six things that the Lord hates, seven that are an abomination to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that make haste to run to evil, a false witness who breathes out lies, and one who sows discord among brothers
When he gets to an honest court for the appeal and wins, I really hope he countersues her for defamation.
Yes. And expose who put her up to this. We have our guesses.
But dopes on Reddit still try to tell me Conservatives have a persecution complex and full of paranoia lmao
Ex Post Facto.
https://twitter.com/BrainStorm_Joe/status/1751314256325185907
Yup^^^
Disgusting!!
This is a big deal.