A very brief summary, that doesn't do it justice so watch if you can, but for those that cannot:
Bret is a digger for truth. Yes, he started out on the wrong side of many arguments, but you have to give the man credit. When he sees the facts telling him he is wrong, he will change his position. You can say the same about me and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. But I digress...
He went down to Darien Gap to figure out what this mass migration of people was all about. After talking with people there, seeing who they are, asking them probing questions, etc... He concludes that while there are some legitimate migrants (legit in that they are free individuals making their way to what they think will be a better place), many if not most have ulterior motives. Particularly the Chinese that he ran into.
For Covid, he says what many of us already believed to be true. That it was a bio-weapon. However, he argues that we may not have seen its true intended purpose yet. He correctly points out there are two difficult problems to overcome with bio-warfare. One, it spreads too easily and you compromise your own population. Or two, it does not spread easily and you have to manually spread it, which is highly inefficient and ineffective. So the idea that Covid virus they made with the help of the US (or at least its traitorist conspirators), is the bioweapon itself, is not accurate. At least not the whole picture.
He is very hesitant to say it out loud, as I believe he is still in a bit of shock from his own conclusions. But in summary he states that there was a very hard push to vax the hell out of western countries with the new mRNA based "vaccines". After about 3 doses, it compromises certain aspects of your immune system. He's not sure what exactly that means yet.
Then you have the Chinese that did not use mRNA vax's at all. What vaccines they used, were traditional.
Now all of a sudden you have a way of differentiating and targeting people with a bio-weapon.
Of course he explains it much better and greater detail than I. I just wanted to wet your appetites and accommodate you if you couldn't watch.
The experts below are from a speech made prior to 2003, over 20 years ago.
Only by using special means to “clean up” America will we be able to lead the Chinese people there. This is the only choice left for us. This is not a matter of whether we are willing to do it or not. What kind of special means is there available for us to “clean up America”?
Conventional weapons such as fighters, canons, missiles and battleships won’t do; neither will highly destructive weapons such as nuclear weapons. We are not as foolish as to want to perish together with America by using nuclear weapons, despite the fact that we have been exclaiming that we will have the Taiwan issue resolved at whatever cost. Only by using non-destructive weapons that can kill many people will we be able to reserve America for ourselves. There has been rapid development of modern biological technology, and new bio-weapons have been invented one after another. Of course, we have not been idle, in the past years we have seized the opportunity to master weapons of this kind. We are capable of achieving our purpose of “cleaning up” America all of a sudden. When Comrade Xiaoping was still with us, the Party Central Committee had the perspicacity to make the right decision not to develop aircraft carrier groups and focus instead on developing lethal weapons that can eliminate mass populations of the enemy country.
From a humanitarian perspective, we should issue a warning to the American people and persuade them to leave America and leave the land they have lived in to the Chinese people. Or at least they should leave half of the United States to be China’s colony, because America was first discovered by the Chinese. But would this work? If this strategy does not work, then there is only one choice left to us. That is, use decisive means to “clean up” America and reserve America for our use in a moment. Our historical experience has proven that as long as we make it happen, nobody in the world can do anything about us. Furthermore, if the United States as the leader is gone, then other enemies have to surrender to us.
Of the research done on genetic weapons throughout the world, Israel is the most advanced. Their genetic weapons are designed to target Arabs and protect the Israelis. But even they have not reached the stage of actual deployment. We have cooperated with Israel on some research. Perhaps we can introduce some of the technologies used to protect Israelis and remold these technologies to protect the yellow people. But their technologies are not mature yet, and it is difficult for us to surpass them in a few years. If it has to be five or ten years before some breakthrough can be achieved in genetic weapons, we cannot afford to wait any longer.
If you get on the website using key words to search, you will find out that a while ago comrade He Xin pointed out to the Hong Kong Business News during an interview that: “The U.S. has a shocking conspiracy.” According to what he had in hand, from September 27 to October 1, 1995, the Mikhail Sergeevich Gorbachev Foundation, funded by the United States, gathered 500 of the world’s most important statesmen, economic leaders and scientists, including George W. Bush (he was not the U.S. president at the time), the Baroness Thatcher, Tony Blair, Zbigniew Brzezinski, as well as George Soros, Bill Gates, futurist John Naisbitt, etc., all of the world’s most popular characters, in the San Francisco Fairmont hotel for a high-level roundtable conference, discussing problems about globalization and how to guide humanity to move forward into the 21st century. According to what He Xin had in hand, the outstanding people of the world in attendance thought that in the 21st century a mere 20 percent of the world’s population will be sufficient to maintain the world’s economy and prosperity, the other 80 percent or 4/5ths of the world’s population will be human garbage unable to produce new values. The people in attendance thought that this excess 80 percent population would be a trash population and “high-tech” means should be used to eliminate them gradually.
I think the thought of it puts many into complete denial of reality. They'll start just talking sports.
Think about it: they got our own military to get rid of a major portion of our forces due to 'a vaccine.'
The vaccination program in our country, due to the dogma of the program, was our Achilles heel.
Thanks to that dogma, our military can't recruit and anyone who didn't take the vaccine is hated.
Getting called a racist or a nazi or a fascist? Well, here are two more excerpts from the speech:
Take response to war as an example. The reason that the United States remains today is that it has never seen war on its mainland. Once its enemies aim at the mainland, these enemies would reach Washington before its congress finishes debating and authorizes the president to declare war. But for us, we don’t waste time on these trivial things. Comrade Deng Xiaoping once said, “The Party’s leadership is prompt in making decisions. Once a decision is made, it is immediately implemented. There’s no wasting time on trivial things like in capitalist countries. This is our advantage! Our Party’s democratic centralism is built on the tradition of great unity. Although fascist Germany also stressed high-level centralism, they only focused on power of the top leader, but ignored the collective leadership of the central group. That’s why Hitler was betrayed by many later in his life, which fundamentally depleted the Nazis of their war capacity.
Germany’s dream to be the “lord of the earth” failed, because ultimately, history did not bestow this great mission upon them. But the three lessons Germany learned from experience are what we ought to remember as we complete our historic mission and revitalize our race. The three lessons are: Firmly grasp the country’s living space; firmly grasp the Party’s control over the nation; and firmly grasp the general direction toward becoming the “lord of the earth.”
Every single DC prostitute who votes to keep our border open should be tried for treason. Full stop.
At 36:45 TC states that BW’s hypothesis about China having basically grown a military force with an over abundance of males to be “remarkable” and then TC goes on to ask BW if, in his recent exploration in South America of the migrant issue, he came across any others (besides the current US (corp) government, the UN and China) who are funding this invasion. The question went unanswered with BW (cleverly imo) instead switching the topic to his history living on a Smithsonian-controlled Panamanian island for eighteen months and how control of the Panama Canal subsequently changed hands - and never answered TC’s direct question. I find it interesting that this important question was never addressed, especially in light of the fact that anons have uncovered another entity who has been funding this invasion. Notable.
I hear you fren, but not everyone wakes up at the same time.
Right now, he is handing out giant red pills. And just maybe, he’s handing them out to the more reluctant to wake up, because they can identify with him more.
what the fuck am I talking about!? I’m talking about drawing a line in the sand that you do not… and Dude… chinamin is not the preferred nomenclature. Asian-American please.”
These evil Chinese entities are waiting for us to die and as they said millions of times, they will take over America, according to them it is theirs. Let’s see who will survive, imagine these bastards coming to our dearest America and taking over, Are you freaking kidding me?
The guidestones were not suggestions.This guy plays his part very well. Hey...doesn't he bear a striking resemblance to that new argentine trickster guy... I mean, president? Perhaps even shares a less obvious likeness with the the ukraine "leader" too. He says his concerns are not just US but the west as a whole. Yeah, right. The rest of the "west" are not our allies and this guy knows exactly why things are happening the way they are and who the primary operators are.
Interesting, Cigartsar, that Weinstein didn't include Cuba as one of the countries where "refugees" are fleeing to the US from. Probably just an innocent oversight as there are so many others. No doubt.
I fully expected down-votes on this. Not a surprise at all. Their sleight of hand abilities are impeccable. For many not to see it is their intent. Therefore...down votes. Some of the down votes may very possibly be from the magicians themselves.
I’m fairly sure TC is aware of all who are funding the invasion. He started by asking BW, “Gee, who’s building that big bridge?” and BW played dumb there, why TC went on to later ask him the direct question about other funders (besides the US, UN and China). So it wasn’t just once BW skirted the issue, but twice. Apparently his role is to point at China and scream loudly (figuratively, of course) to make sure all eyes are on them and NOT on the players behind the Chinese. Sleight of hand, indeed, but omissions set red flags off in my tired, old brain.
The thing is, the evasion and topic-slide tell us something in the very fact they were put into practice - for those paying attention who aren’t emotionally-attached to the personalities. (Or the magicians themselves, as you posit. I got that feeling also as a distinct possibility).
Interesting that you’re being downvoted. I don’t know much about this guy, what he knows or doesn’t, but it’s a good idea in general to be cautious about those who appear to be on the right side lest they turn out to be merely controlled opposition.
See my other comment here. It’s worth pondering WHY Tucker asked Bret if he’s aware of any other entities funding the invasion. It’s also worth considering WHY this direct question was never answered and the topic was switched.
BW did not appear to be avoiding the question, imho. To me, it appeared he was eager to reveal the phenomena that many things were having exactly the opposite effect as they were originally designed.
It’s called topic sliding, a clever ruse to, instead of addressing a posed question, slide it peripherally to an adjacent topic. If you look at the link to the funding issue this HIAS influence is right there in Darien Gap where BW went to research this issue, noticing other entities that are funding this invasion, but somehow missing the HIAS connection. Or, as politicians (who are adept at this tactic) say “Answer the question you’d hoped they would ask, not the one they actually did ask.”
In his defense, if he (BW) is aware of the HIAS influence it may not be due to misplaced loyalties that he didn’t answer TC’s direct question on this, but due to fear of reprisals, perhaps severe/fatal, if he should bring them to light on a major news outlet. Not everyone can afford military-grade protection for themselves and their families. I know very little about Mr Weinstein other than he’s a leftist and whatever was disclosed in this TC interview. He seems intelligent and affable, if not cautious, but then that doesn’t mean he can’t be controlled opposition either. For practiced game-players, this kind of deception comes as naturally as breathing air, but BW may just be an innocent observer. It remains to be seen, but it would be wise to be cautious and take everything in when considering why an omission may occur during an interview.
Thank you for your thoughtful reply, Luminosity. My senior class voted: most naïve: Karen, runner-up: Karen. Since then, I became a felony investigator and am one of the least naïve of my peers. I’d say I’ve become more discerning, and imagine practiced game players can still fool me. But at this point, I will give BW the benefit of the doubt because my guess is TC vets his guests pretty well. I have visited CFP quite often since 2020 and this is perhaps my second(?) time doing a private chat like I am with you right now. 😁 Thank you again, Patriot!
A very brief summary, that doesn't do it justice so watch if you can, but for those that cannot:
Bret is a digger for truth. Yes, he started out on the wrong side of many arguments, but you have to give the man credit. When he sees the facts telling him he is wrong, he will change his position. You can say the same about me and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. But I digress...
He went down to Darien Gap to figure out what this mass migration of people was all about. After talking with people there, seeing who they are, asking them probing questions, etc... He concludes that while there are some legitimate migrants (legit in that they are free individuals making their way to what they think will be a better place), many if not most have ulterior motives. Particularly the Chinese that he ran into.
For Covid, he says what many of us already believed to be true. That it was a bio-weapon. However, he argues that we may not have seen its true intended purpose yet. He correctly points out there are two difficult problems to overcome with bio-warfare. One, it spreads too easily and you compromise your own population. Or two, it does not spread easily and you have to manually spread it, which is highly inefficient and ineffective. So the idea that Covid virus they made with the help of the US (or at least its traitorist conspirators), is the bioweapon itself, is not accurate. At least not the whole picture.
He is very hesitant to say it out loud, as I believe he is still in a bit of shock from his own conclusions. But in summary he states that there was a very hard push to vax the hell out of western countries with the new mRNA based "vaccines". After about 3 doses, it compromises certain aspects of your immune system. He's not sure what exactly that means yet.
Then you have the Chinese that did not use mRNA vax's at all. What vaccines they used, were traditional.
Now all of a sudden you have a way of differentiating and targeting people with a bio-weapon.
Of course he explains it much better and greater detail than I. I just wanted to wet your appetites and accommodate you if you couldn't watch.
Thanks for the summary!
I used to be a "lefty" but my views never changed its like the whole world around me shifted further to the left making me "far right"
As Leo Terrell once stated, “I didn’t leave my party; my party left me!”
..."Whet" is for appetites. "Wet" is for whistles...
Today's grammar lesson is complete.
It is brilliant. Bret is a true genius, but also a leftard. He is super slow to acknowledge his stupidity, but make no mistake
He is as smart as they come.
He just does not realize he loves Trump and will vote that way soon.
Hehe
Lol. I think so too.
FYI, his brother, Eric?
Total loss and complete douchebag.
I love quantum theorists and study their work. Eric's theories are spurious at best.
Total BS.
Of course that posits, that I am capable of discussing it.
Probably, not.
But, in my judgement? Brett is OK and his brother Eric is a douche.
Starts off slow but stay with it. I watched the whole thing. What is different about this video is that Bret puts the pieces together.
That was a great interview. His theory on the COVID vax towards the end if the video is scary as hell.
And very plausible.
We were warned.
The experts below are from a speech made prior to 2003, over 20 years ago.
I think the thought of it puts many into complete denial of reality. They'll start just talking sports.
Think about it: they got our own military to get rid of a major portion of our forces due to 'a vaccine.'
The vaccination program in our country, due to the dogma of the program, was our Achilles heel.
Thanks to that dogma, our military can't recruit and anyone who didn't take the vaccine is hated.
Getting called a racist or a nazi or a fascist? Well, here are two more excerpts from the speech:
Every single DC prostitute who votes to keep our border open should be tried for treason. Full stop.
This is a brilliant interview. Never heard of the guy before but he is an amazing thinker. I will keep an eye on him. I'm grateful I heard him speak.
At 36:45 TC states that BW’s hypothesis about China having basically grown a military force with an over abundance of males to be “remarkable” and then TC goes on to ask BW if, in his recent exploration in South America of the migrant issue, he came across any others (besides the current US (corp) government, the UN and China) who are funding this invasion. The question went unanswered with BW (cleverly imo) instead switching the topic to his history living on a Smithsonian-controlled Panamanian island for eighteen months and how control of the Panama Canal subsequently changed hands - and never answered TC’s direct question. I find it interesting that this important question was never addressed, especially in light of the fact that anons have uncovered another entity who has been funding this invasion. Notable.
.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17s5tmDMKF/who-is-funding-illegal-immigrati/c/
Astute observation…hmm..
Great that he’s waking up, but he voted for ALL of this because when the Dems were subtle he was too arrogant to see the truth!🤷🏼♂️
I hear you fren, but not everyone wakes up at the same time.
Right now, he is handing out giant red pills. And just maybe, he’s handing them out to the more reluctant to wake up, because they can identify with him more.
I bet its the Chinamin!
https://youtu.be/LslnDx16-Ik?si=RZ-vHhi3I1fILvyK
Already widely used as a weapon!
Let's assume that China isn't going to take advantage of this new attenuation signal (I am skeptical with the other things the CCP has done).
There are individuals in this world that would take advantage of that signal & create a biological weapon to remove the populace that took the shot.
These evil Chinese entities are waiting for us to die and as they said millions of times, they will take over America, according to them it is theirs. Let’s see who will survive, imagine these bastards coming to our dearest America and taking over, Are you freaking kidding me?
The guidestones were not suggestions.This guy plays his part very well. Hey...doesn't he bear a striking resemblance to that new argentine trickster guy... I mean, president? Perhaps even shares a less obvious likeness with the the ukraine "leader" too. He says his concerns are not just US but the west as a whole. Yeah, right. The rest of the "west" are not our allies and this guy knows exactly why things are happening the way they are and who the primary operators are.
Are you speaking about Bret Weinstein?
He is legit.
He lost his tenure as a professor at a university for crazy reasons.
Then he lost his dark horse YouTube channel for hosting Robert Malone and Steve Kirsch, discussing the lies of covid and Vax in early days.
He paid a huge price for telling what he thought was the truth.
He is an intellectual warrior, imo.
Interesting, Cigartsar, that Weinstein didn't include Cuba as one of the countries where "refugees" are fleeing to the US from. Probably just an innocent oversight as there are so many others. No doubt.
Most likely.
I fully expected down-votes on this. Not a surprise at all. Their sleight of hand abilities are impeccable. For many not to see it is their intent. Therefore...down votes. Some of the down votes may very possibly be from the magicians themselves.
I’m fairly sure TC is aware of all who are funding the invasion. He started by asking BW, “Gee, who’s building that big bridge?” and BW played dumb there, why TC went on to later ask him the direct question about other funders (besides the US, UN and China). So it wasn’t just once BW skirted the issue, but twice. Apparently his role is to point at China and scream loudly (figuratively, of course) to make sure all eyes are on them and NOT on the players behind the Chinese. Sleight of hand, indeed, but omissions set red flags off in my tired, old brain.
The thing is, the evasion and topic-slide tell us something in the very fact they were put into practice - for those paying attention who aren’t emotionally-attached to the personalities. (Or the magicians themselves, as you posit. I got that feeling also as a distinct possibility).
Interesting that you’re being downvoted. I don’t know much about this guy, what he knows or doesn’t, but it’s a good idea in general to be cautious about those who appear to be on the right side lest they turn out to be merely controlled opposition.
See my other comment here. It’s worth pondering WHY Tucker asked Bret if he’s aware of any other entities funding the invasion. It’s also worth considering WHY this direct question was never answered and the topic was switched.
BW did not appear to be avoiding the question, imho. To me, it appeared he was eager to reveal the phenomena that many things were having exactly the opposite effect as they were originally designed.
It’s called topic sliding, a clever ruse to, instead of addressing a posed question, slide it peripherally to an adjacent topic. If you look at the link to the funding issue this HIAS influence is right there in Darien Gap where BW went to research this issue, noticing other entities that are funding this invasion, but somehow missing the HIAS connection. Or, as politicians (who are adept at this tactic) say “Answer the question you’d hoped they would ask, not the one they actually did ask.”
In his defense, if he (BW) is aware of the HIAS influence it may not be due to misplaced loyalties that he didn’t answer TC’s direct question on this, but due to fear of reprisals, perhaps severe/fatal, if he should bring them to light on a major news outlet. Not everyone can afford military-grade protection for themselves and their families. I know very little about Mr Weinstein other than he’s a leftist and whatever was disclosed in this TC interview. He seems intelligent and affable, if not cautious, but then that doesn’t mean he can’t be controlled opposition either. For practiced game-players, this kind of deception comes as naturally as breathing air, but BW may just be an innocent observer. It remains to be seen, but it would be wise to be cautious and take everything in when considering why an omission may occur during an interview.
Thank you for your thoughtful reply, Luminosity. My senior class voted: most naïve: Karen, runner-up: Karen. Since then, I became a felony investigator and am one of the least naïve of my peers. I’d say I’ve become more discerning, and imagine practiced game players can still fool me. But at this point, I will give BW the benefit of the doubt because my guess is TC vets his guests pretty well. I have visited CFP quite often since 2020 and this is perhaps my second(?) time doing a private chat like I am with you right now. 😁 Thank you again, Patriot!