If people can't accept that chem trails are real, that the navy is carrying out research on DEW, rail guns, and laser weapons - which is documented in official navy publications FFS, then they're probably not going to grasp the subtleties of Q.
Why would you bring up flat earth? I think you need to be a bit more open minded to the reality we live in, rather than mention on CIA planted conspiracies - which is what the flat earth crap is.
The thing is, Q, by definition, is a psyop.
"Psychological Operations (PSYOP) Soldiers benefit the Army’s missions by using unconventional techniques. Their intelligence, interpersonal skills, cultural sensitivity, and foreign language proficiency help sway opinions and actions of foreign governments, groups, and individuals." That's taken directly from the US Army recruiting website under the heading "Psychological Operations
https://www.goarmy.com/careers-and-jobs/specialty-careers/special-ops/psychological-operations.html
Putting real world technology into the same basket as the Q operation doesn't make any sense. Q is a psyop. These other weapons systems are real
The name “Chem-trails” was coined by the CIA for a reason just like “Flat Earth”. It is a psyop to cover something up and discredit those looking into it. It may be intentional distraction or misdirect or just straight-up co-opt of some key truth.
Chem-trails are not needed to achieve the objective of toxifying the environment and food supply chain. There are many other vectors of attack.
Mods generally have a good point. Don’t get distracted by shiny objects. I happen to believe based on very, very limited evidence that something is going on in the skies, but not enough credible, vetted sauce available to figure out what it is right now. So I put it in my “look at later” binder.
For all we know, Patriots may be dropping aerosolized ivermectin on us now through various means.
Yes, trying to give you some hope that if there is indeed a plan, whatever nefarious stuff might be going on in the sky is probably getting co-opted by good guys to help and/or protect us.
There is a legitimate possibility that things being sprayed into the air, if that is indeed happening, could be getting used to track or find demons or aliens or other entities that normally would be invisible and impossible to see and track. This war of good vs evil is not limited to the physical realm, imo. Just something to consider.
"Chemtrails" are not real. All the "evidence" relies on ignorance of what contrails are and what cloud forms water vapor can take. (Not to mention ignorance of how airliners are built.) I've seen no Navy admission of anything. Patents are only bright ideas, proving nothing operational. Cloud-seeding for local weather influence has been a thing since the 1950s, but goes no farther than that.
DEWs have been real for a half century, but they are not magic weapons, and they are not in space. Their existing applications are in tactical combat. They do not represent any technology that is either controversial or Q-related.
I'm old enough to remember an entirely different airline industry.
You don't see the "same contrails" because you don't "see" the same planes. See, back before I could grow facial hair, jet engines weren't as advanced as they are today. The skies back then were jam packed with jets like the 727, MD-8X, the 737-200, and the most common engine in the skies were the low-bypass turbofan engines such as the Pratt & Whitney JT8D. These engines are less efficient and produce more emissions compared to modern high-bypass turbofans. Low-bypass engines (attached) have a smaller ratio of air bypassing the core to air passing through the core, making them less efficient, the exhaust has significantly higher levels of unburnt hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen oxides, and tons of small dusty particulates. They mixed with whatever water vapour was in the exhaust and quickly fell to Earth. See how dirty they are??
THAT'S why they were different.
You seem intellectually incapable of comprehending the importance of this change. Compare the 737-MAX's super advanced LEAP-1B jet to the JT8D. It delivers 35,000 pounds of thrust vs the JT8D's 17,000 pounds of thrust ALL WHILE BURNING 20% LESS FUEL per flight hour.
That's HUUUUUUGE.
THAT is why you see more condensation, because the more efficient engines result in SIGNIFICANTLY higher proportions of the fuel being successfully converted to carbon dioxide (CO2) and water (H2O). Thus, for a given amount of fuel, the LEAP-1B would produce far more water as a by-product than older engines, LEADING TO MORE CONTRAILS.
OR it could be a secret CIA global secret program that DEPENDS on people being too stupid to actually ask questions that answer their concerns and you better TURN YOUR YOUTUBE COMMENTS OFF OR ELSE PEOPLE WILL ASK THE WRONG QUESTIONS
I'm very familiar with the analysis of turbo-engines. But here's the problem with your thinking: When fuel is burned, allowing for inefficient combustion, the inefficiency is usually related to full combustion of the carbon. The hydrogen likes to be fully combusted. So, if you are using less fuel, you can't possibly be generating more water, at least for the same thrust level.
There is a simpler reason. Modern aircraft are now flying commonplace at higher altitudes. Where the air has less water vapor, true, but the relative humidity is mostly saturated. So water vapor exhausting into this air cannot remain as vapor and will condense (or crystalize), making a contrail without fail.
I grew up in the town of Bellingham in Washington state. When I was a small child, I would sit out in the back lawn on a sunny and cloudless day, and watch multi-engine jet aircraft fly far overhead, leaving behind white marks across the sky like chalk. What I was watching were test flights of B-52 bombers being built at the Boeing works in Seattle. B-52s fly at 50,000 feet. Flying at much lower altitudes (early jetliners) would only occasionally produce contrails (there was more moisture in the air, but the relative humidity was low).
If people can't accept that chem trails are real, that the navy is carrying out research on DEW, rail guns, and laser weapons - which is documented in official navy publications FFS, then they're probably not going to grasp the subtleties of Q.
What are you even talking about, though? The U.S. Navy officially abandoned its railgun project which had been under development for more than a decade. The project was a money pit that yielded good experimental results but that was projected to eat up billions more in engineering costs miniaturizing the system for installation on Navy ships. The project was shelved because the USN wanted to focus on catching up to Russia and China in the areas of hypersonic missiles and advanced laser systems.
YES, the Navies of the entire world are looking at lasers for "point defense" (like the HELIOS) but, like the rail gun, that system is a FAR CRY from being proven to be able to take out missiles—or vaporized small communities—and hardly weaponized or miniaturized to be ready to put into orbit.
So, if you want to talk about "real" systems, then cool, describe the tech in orbit that's shooting green lasers down to start wildfires through thunderstorms. GO.
Instead, what we'll get is the usual crickets, and you'll hope that this conversation goes away. This shit should be common knowledge to regulars around here. Or am I the only one around here that is a Defense nerd?
This is why this weaksauce bullshit is 1) to be discussed elsewhere and 2) weaksauce, low-info, low-effort posters and commenters here are regularly moved off this board.
Wait - did they abandon the projects for real, or did they abandon them like Lifelog? I generally agree with what you are saying but you are also claiming things that you can't possibly know. You have no idea if the military really abandoned any project, or if they simply moved them to black ops or civilian agencies (see Lifelog).
I'd rather not have most of the stupid stuff on here either, but you are doing some of the same stuff the blue-roofers are doing - arguing about something that you can't prove. I think mods mostly do a really good job, but things are getting out of hand. When a mod threatens everyone with a permaban because someone posts something they don't like, that will do more to silence newbies than any of this stuff. I don't even have a dog in that fight, but it pissed me off.
I think it actually does one thing by banning this, we all being to search for truth and then we will find it. Banning something true won’t make it go away, only hide it under the rug. The more you ban a truth, the more that truth begins to take over. So if DEW’s really do exist, banning them will simply bring attention to said item and it will get accepted into the fold regardless of the mods. I honestly didn’t care until it began to be banned, now I’m waiting and watching to see if it will be true. I heard one prophet tell a vision they had about a drone shooting a laser. I think it’s very likely but this technology is likely deep in the cabal’s hands. Our fight against this isn’t going to be physical, it’s in prayer for our nation.
If people can't accept that chem trails are real, that the navy is carrying out research on DEW, rail guns, and laser weapons - which is documented in official navy publications FFS, then they're probably not going to grasp the subtleties of Q.
Why would you bring up flat earth? I think you need to be a bit more open minded to the reality we live in, rather than mention on CIA planted conspiracies - which is what the flat earth crap is.
The thing is, Q, by definition, is a psyop.
"Psychological Operations (PSYOP) Soldiers benefit the Army’s missions by using unconventional techniques. Their intelligence, interpersonal skills, cultural sensitivity, and foreign language proficiency help sway opinions and actions of foreign governments, groups, and individuals." That's taken directly from the US Army recruiting website under the heading "Psychological Operations https://www.goarmy.com/careers-and-jobs/specialty-careers/special-ops/psychological-operations.html
Putting real world technology into the same basket as the Q operation doesn't make any sense. Q is a psyop. These other weapons systems are real
The name “Chem-trails” was coined by the CIA for a reason just like “Flat Earth”. It is a psyop to cover something up and discredit those looking into it. It may be intentional distraction or misdirect or just straight-up co-opt of some key truth.
Chem-trails are not needed to achieve the objective of toxifying the environment and food supply chain. There are many other vectors of attack.
Mods generally have a good point. Don’t get distracted by shiny objects. I happen to believe based on very, very limited evidence that something is going on in the skies, but not enough credible, vetted sauce available to figure out what it is right now. So I put it in my “look at later” binder.
For all we know, Patriots may be dropping aerosolized ivermectin on us now through various means.
"For all we know, Patriots may be dropping aerosolized ivermectin on us now through various means."
Same thing - aerosolized, whatever - all dropped as chemicals form the air
Yes, trying to give you some hope that if there is indeed a plan, whatever nefarious stuff might be going on in the sky is probably getting co-opted by good guys to help and/or protect us.
There is a legitimate possibility that things being sprayed into the air, if that is indeed happening, could be getting used to track or find demons or aliens or other entities that normally would be invisible and impossible to see and track. This war of good vs evil is not limited to the physical realm, imo. Just something to consider.
"Chemtrails" are not real. All the "evidence" relies on ignorance of what contrails are and what cloud forms water vapor can take. (Not to mention ignorance of how airliners are built.) I've seen no Navy admission of anything. Patents are only bright ideas, proving nothing operational. Cloud-seeding for local weather influence has been a thing since the 1950s, but goes no farther than that.
DEWs have been real for a half century, but they are not magic weapons, and they are not in space. Their existing applications are in tactical combat. They do not represent any technology that is either controversial or Q-related.
I'm old enough to remember an entirely different airline industry.
You don't see the "same contrails" because you don't "see" the same planes. See, back before I could grow facial hair, jet engines weren't as advanced as they are today. The skies back then were jam packed with jets like the 727, MD-8X, the 737-200, and the most common engine in the skies were the low-bypass turbofan engines such as the Pratt & Whitney JT8D. These engines are less efficient and produce more emissions compared to modern high-bypass turbofans. Low-bypass engines (attached) have a smaller ratio of air bypassing the core to air passing through the core, making them less efficient, the exhaust has significantly higher levels of unburnt hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen oxides, and tons of small dusty particulates. They mixed with whatever water vapour was in the exhaust and quickly fell to Earth. See how dirty they are??
THAT'S why they were different.
You seem intellectually incapable of comprehending the importance of this change. Compare the 737-MAX's super advanced LEAP-1B jet to the JT8D. It delivers 35,000 pounds of thrust vs the JT8D's 17,000 pounds of thrust ALL WHILE BURNING 20% LESS FUEL per flight hour.
That's HUUUUUUGE.
THAT is why you see more condensation, because the more efficient engines result in SIGNIFICANTLY higher proportions of the fuel being successfully converted to carbon dioxide (CO2) and water (H2O). Thus, for a given amount of fuel, the LEAP-1B would produce far more water as a by-product than older engines, LEADING TO MORE CONTRAILS.
OR it could be a secret CIA global secret program that DEPENDS on people being too stupid to actually ask questions that answer their concerns and you better TURN YOUR YOUTUBE COMMENTS OFF OR ELSE PEOPLE WILL ASK THE WRONG QUESTIONS
I'm very familiar with the analysis of turbo-engines. But here's the problem with your thinking: When fuel is burned, allowing for inefficient combustion, the inefficiency is usually related to full combustion of the carbon. The hydrogen likes to be fully combusted. So, if you are using less fuel, you can't possibly be generating more water, at least for the same thrust level.
There is a simpler reason. Modern aircraft are now flying commonplace at higher altitudes. Where the air has less water vapor, true, but the relative humidity is mostly saturated. So water vapor exhausting into this air cannot remain as vapor and will condense (or crystalize), making a contrail without fail.
I grew up in the town of Bellingham in Washington state. When I was a small child, I would sit out in the back lawn on a sunny and cloudless day, and watch multi-engine jet aircraft fly far overhead, leaving behind white marks across the sky like chalk. What I was watching were test flights of B-52 bombers being built at the Boeing works in Seattle. B-52s fly at 50,000 feet. Flying at much lower altitudes (early jetliners) would only occasionally produce contrails (there was more moisture in the air, but the relative humidity was low).
What are you even talking about, though? The U.S. Navy officially abandoned its railgun project which had been under development for more than a decade. The project was a money pit that yielded good experimental results but that was projected to eat up billions more in engineering costs miniaturizing the system for installation on Navy ships. The project was shelved because the USN wanted to focus on catching up to Russia and China in the areas of hypersonic missiles and advanced laser systems.
YES, the Navies of the entire world are looking at lasers for "point defense" (like the HELIOS) but, like the rail gun, that system is a FAR CRY from being proven to be able to take out missiles—or vaporized small communities—and hardly weaponized or miniaturized to be ready to put into orbit.
So, if you want to talk about "real" systems, then cool, describe the tech in orbit that's shooting green lasers down to start wildfires through thunderstorms. GO.
Instead, what we'll get is the usual crickets, and you'll hope that this conversation goes away. This shit should be common knowledge to regulars around here. Or am I the only one around here that is a Defense nerd?
This is why this weaksauce bullshit is 1) to be discussed elsewhere and 2) weaksauce, low-info, low-effort posters and commenters here are regularly moved off this board.
Wait - did they abandon the projects for real, or did they abandon them like Lifelog? I generally agree with what you are saying but you are also claiming things that you can't possibly know. You have no idea if the military really abandoned any project, or if they simply moved them to black ops or civilian agencies (see Lifelog).
I'd rather not have most of the stupid stuff on here either, but you are doing some of the same stuff the blue-roofers are doing - arguing about something that you can't prove. I think mods mostly do a really good job, but things are getting out of hand. When a mod threatens everyone with a permaban because someone posts something they don't like, that will do more to silence newbies than any of this stuff. I don't even have a dog in that fight, but it pissed me off.
I think it actually does one thing by banning this, we all being to search for truth and then we will find it. Banning something true won’t make it go away, only hide it under the rug. The more you ban a truth, the more that truth begins to take over. So if DEW’s really do exist, banning them will simply bring attention to said item and it will get accepted into the fold regardless of the mods. I honestly didn’t care until it began to be banned, now I’m waiting and watching to see if it will be true. I heard one prophet tell a vision they had about a drone shooting a laser. I think it’s very likely but this technology is likely deep in the cabal’s hands. Our fight against this isn’t going to be physical, it’s in prayer for our nation.
Oops, no response so far