The thing is this - it's unfair to the rational-thinking liberty-minded etc women (certainly many here obviously are) to say they couldn't vote, and there's plenty of cuck irrational men these days too, but generally speaking women are pretty irrational and emotional compared to men. On average their inclusion in voting has been more of a problem than not.
Solution: I still maintain that the right to vote should include a civics test to prove understanding of our republic's basics, and an oath to the constitution. Like driver's licenses being far too lenient, voting should be earned on merit, not just breathing ability.
Proper education of how our government is supposed to work according the Constitution is key for the survival of our country. This is exactly what is needed.
Yeah it's not sex, or race, or anything - it's are you culturally aligned with the ideas of freedom, individualism/individual rights - NO "group rights," property, capitalism, limited government, etc - or not.
Edit: by "culturally aligned" I mean "mentally/philosophically aligned" - like your expectation based on your mental framework/fundamental outlook is one of good and noble culture.
The problems can happen with who makes the questions and who decides the correct answers. If limiting even one person's rights, then it's not a good law. Some states used to use different tests to limit people voting. Even if a person ---say an autist---can't read well, should they be banned from voting. Lets stick with the constitution for now, if we can get that enforced it would be huge.
Are you hearing yourself right now? How in the name of logic is a test adding you who you elected reps are unfair? How is someone who can't read well voting now? What are you on about mate? The Jim Crow stuff was before blacks were allowed to get an education. It is free now for everyone. Smdh
I am for freedom and not taking away our rights. So if I can't pass your test I can't vote? I am for Getting our rights back, not taking more away. And I am not talking Jim Crow,
Unfortunately any sort of “test” (say, multiple choice or essay) is a Mike field of bias. Even MC tests are poor at best for evaluating knowledge or skills.
No, just a random short quiz on some basics in order to cast a ballot that day, effective immediately. Voter registration requirements can be added to include more complex items, but people will have to go in person to fulfill them. This can be after the entire voter rolls are purged and we all have to re-register.
The issues with these sorts of evaluations are inherent in their design. By sitting for an exam, some will have enhanced performance, some perform the same, some (because of anxiety or other reasons) will have their performance decrease.
They possess the knowledge and skills, but having a sit down MC exam reduced their ability to recall or think critically. I don’t think that’s hard to understand. My concern is, how would anyone administer a test at that scale and not introduce biases? Haven’t even started talking about the issues with test question writers.
Every method used by modern public “education” has been shown, time and time and time again, to be the WORST methods for teaching or evaluation. Even by “scholars” and their “research” (I’m a PhD at a university - yes, I work on a ship that is sinking). Yet we continue to use those methods because … I have no idea why, unless we want to purposely ruin children.
There no evaluation of IQ or learning in a civics quiz. If you don't know who your elected representatives are or what the legislation that you're supposed to decide on works, then you shouldn't be voting. Methodological discussions about learning don't apply, this information is available outside of government indoctrination daycare centers.
On that topic, if you knew me, your know I'm a fierce proponent of home school. The Humanists funded by robber barons designed government centers to replace family and church with government and state, to prepare compliant and obedient workers for the factories (see The Why Files on YT for a great breakdown of this Rockefeller initiative) and for the "inevitable" consolidation with communism. To accomplish this of course it's necessary to do away with critical thinking and knowledge of one's natural rights, to replace facts with mutable feelings to be directed by mass media programming, etc. But that's still not impacting a plain civics quiz yet. The awake will pass it and the rest will catch up eventually.
Many of the Anons really are autistic, If they want to vote I think our Autists deserve it. Limits on who can vote when implemented beyond the constitution have historically been bad. The south used tests to limit the ex slaves, used again for years whenever the deep state could get away with it. Right now if they started limiting voters, MAGA would be at the top of the list, then Christians, Jews, Muslims, or any non government religion.
If the constitutional laws were followed there would be no problem.
The thing is this - it's unfair to the rational-thinking liberty-minded etc women (certainly many here obviously are) to say they couldn't vote, and there's plenty of cuck irrational men these days too, but generally speaking women are pretty irrational and emotional compared to men. On average their inclusion in voting has been more of a problem than not.
Solution: I still maintain that the right to vote should include a civics test to prove understanding of our republic's basics, and an oath to the constitution. Like driver's licenses being far too lenient, voting should be earned on merit, not just breathing ability.
Proper education of how our government is supposed to work according the Constitution is key for the survival of our country. This is exactly what is needed.
Yeah it's not sex, or race, or anything - it's are you culturally aligned with the ideas of freedom, individualism/individual rights - NO "group rights," property, capitalism, limited government, etc - or not.
Edit: by "culturally aligned" I mean "mentally/philosophically aligned" - like your expectation based on your mental framework/fundamental outlook is one of good and noble culture.
Can't say I disagree
The civics quiz requirement would indeed filter out a lot of bad quality votes.
The problems can happen with who makes the questions and who decides the correct answers. If limiting even one person's rights, then it's not a good law. Some states used to use different tests to limit people voting. Even if a person ---say an autist---can't read well, should they be banned from voting. Lets stick with the constitution for now, if we can get that enforced it would be huge.
Are you hearing yourself right now? How in the name of logic is a test adding you who you elected reps are unfair? How is someone who can't read well voting now? What are you on about mate? The Jim Crow stuff was before blacks were allowed to get an education. It is free now for everyone. Smdh
I am for freedom and not taking away our rights. So if I can't pass your test I can't vote? I am for Getting our rights back, not taking more away. And I am not talking Jim Crow,
I agree excellent points.
Unfortunately any sort of “test” (say, multiple choice or essay) is a Mike field of bias. Even MC tests are poor at best for evaluating knowledge or skills.
What? Basic civics- what are the branches of government, who is your mayor, governor, senator, president...
Yup, plus short essays like briefly explain WHY the branches of government. List and briefly explain the Bill of Rights. Etc.
And - all tests/answers in American English.
No, just a random short quiz on some basics in order to cast a ballot that day, effective immediately. Voter registration requirements can be added to include more complex items, but people will have to go in person to fulfill them. This can be after the entire voter rolls are purged and we all have to re-register.
The issues with these sorts of evaluations are inherent in their design. By sitting for an exam, some will have enhanced performance, some perform the same, some (because of anxiety or other reasons) will have their performance decrease.
They possess the knowledge and skills, but having a sit down MC exam reduced their ability to recall or think critically. I don’t think that’s hard to understand. My concern is, how would anyone administer a test at that scale and not introduce biases? Haven’t even started talking about the issues with test question writers.
Every method used by modern public “education” has been shown, time and time and time again, to be the WORST methods for teaching or evaluation. Even by “scholars” and their “research” (I’m a PhD at a university - yes, I work on a ship that is sinking). Yet we continue to use those methods because … I have no idea why, unless we want to purposely ruin children.
There no evaluation of IQ or learning in a civics quiz. If you don't know who your elected representatives are or what the legislation that you're supposed to decide on works, then you shouldn't be voting. Methodological discussions about learning don't apply, this information is available outside of government indoctrination daycare centers.
On that topic, if you knew me, your know I'm a fierce proponent of home school. The Humanists funded by robber barons designed government centers to replace family and church with government and state, to prepare compliant and obedient workers for the factories (see The Why Files on YT for a great breakdown of this Rockefeller initiative) and for the "inevitable" consolidation with communism. To accomplish this of course it's necessary to do away with critical thinking and knowledge of one's natural rights, to replace facts with mutable feelings to be directed by mass media programming, etc. But that's still not impacting a plain civics quiz yet. The awake will pass it and the rest will catch up eventually.
Many of the Anons really are autistic, If they want to vote I think our Autists deserve it. Limits on who can vote when implemented beyond the constitution have historically been bad. The south used tests to limit the ex slaves, used again for years whenever the deep state could get away with it. Right now if they started limiting voters, MAGA would be at the top of the list, then Christians, Jews, Muslims, or any non government religion.
If the constitutional laws were followed there would be no problem.