But not only information but the ability to logically sift and analyze the information.
It does one no good if they hold a wealth of knowledge but little critical thinking skills to separate unrelated data points and connect seemingly unrelated data points.
It's exactly what we see here today. A wealth of information at our fingertips yet people can't sift through it let alone analyze it critically.
I mean a massive amount of studies have been performed for decades with a wealth of data points and the vast of that data pointing to economic and education levels being the predominant determinator of propensity to commit crime.
Yet people turn into neanderthals suddenly.
"Blacks and Hispanics commit most crimes. See. Look at this "X" percentage."
HEY! If it's not already obvious to you! The end percentage point is exactly that! The result of something! Not the "something"!
Black is not the cause!
Hispanic is not the cause!
Minority is not the cause!
People with money have more to lose by engaging in violent crime than do poor people.
But there are poor people in every racial demographic and STILL black violent crime rates are MUCH higher than in any other group.
You canNOT simply ignore that and pretend like it is not a thing.
States with the HIGHEST murder rates:
Mississippi
Louisiana
Alabama
New Mexico
South Carolina
Missouri
Illinois
Maryland
Tennessee
Arkansas
States with the highest black population:
Mississippi
Louisiana
Georgia (#11 murder rate)
Maryland
Alabama
South Carolina
Delaware (#12 murder rate)
North Carolina (#13 murder rate)
Virginia
New York
Note: New Mexico is #1 in Hispanic population and #3 in American Indian population.
States with LOWEST murder rates:
New Hampshire *
Vermont *
Wyoming *
Maine
Idaho
Massachussetts
Hawaii
Utah
Iowa
North Dakota
(*) means zero murders
States with the highest White population:
West Virginia
Wyoming
Vermont
Maine
New Hampshire
Iowa
Oregon
Kentucky
Kansas
Nebraska
Note: WV is #1 in White population, #4 in poverty rate, but only #25 in murder rate. For murder rates, Iowa is #41, Oregon is # 31, Kentucky is #15, Kansas is #28, and Nebraska is #38.
You can claim that there is SOME association with poverty and murder (violent crime).
But there is a GREATER association with race and murder.
Perhaps race plays a role in BOTH poverty and violence, due to biological reasons moreso than societal reasons.
The student body population of Harvard University is 14% black. But that is due to racial quotas. If black students were admitted under the same requirements that White students have to abide by, then less than 1% of the Harvard student body population would be black.
This is not societal, as all students today have access to K-12 education, which is the preparation for admission to universities.
A recent medical research study was conducted to figure out why blacks have higher rates of certain illnesses than Whites (sickle cell anemia, for example). It had nothing to do with crime or poverty.
The researchers theorized the idea of a difference in testosterone or other hormone levels as a cause of difference illnesses, so they studied those.
They found that testosterone levels were similar in White males and black males, with White males slightly higher than black males, but black females much higher than White females.
However, they found that esterogen levels were significantly higher in black males than White males (and also higher in black females than White females).
They drew no conclusions from this. But I would suggest that if esterogen causes more emotional actions by females versus males, then perhaps it also helps explain why so many black males do not control their own emotional impulses. If so, this would be biological, not societal.
DEI hires unqualified people based on their skin color, not their merit.
And we have planes losing doors and wheels, and pilots complaining of greatly increased near misses of mid-air collisions due to air traffic contollers (DEI hires) not knowing WTF they are doing.
We even have audio recordings of conversations from an air traffic controller who clearly did not know WTF she was talking about, trying to chastise a pilot, who was doing what he was supposed to do.
The society is turning to shit, more and more each day. This might not be the only issue to discuss, but it IS an important one.
It should not be swept under the rug, as YOU are trying to do, and as the OP article of lying about race among violent criminals is doing.
Your own fear of talking about difficult issues only makes the problem worse.
BTW, I hear there is a need for people -- such as yourself -- to take in some illegal invaders into your home since the government cannot "afford" it anymore. How many would YOU like to house? Can we put you down for about 15? 20?
Let us know!
Those Haitian cannibals don't wanna live under a bridge, after all. They will need your warm home, your well-stocked fridge, and cruise around in your car.
Blacks (of which I am not) in the early 1900's had the lowest divorce rates, safest communities, had successful doctors and shop owners and schools, while segregated, had a higher literacy rate than that of its white counterpart. Blacks had a higher church attendance rate also. After all what do you expect lead them through slavery and into and through lynching mobs of the early 1900's if it wasn't there faith in the Lord.
Not to take away anything from heroic whites who were also lynched alongside them as they attempted to help their fellow human beings. Heroic whites who were lynched in equal numbers to blacks at the time.
This is NOT a knock on whites or any other for that matter, but an example of where MAG768720's arguments and false assumptions fail miserably.
These FACTS fly in the face of any assertion that genetic make-up contributes to propensity to commit crime.
If one were armed with this data than one could only conclude that. Genetics plays no role in propensity to commit crime or any conclusion of inferiority. One is ONLY left to continue to ask the 'why?'.
Hey MAG768720, I'll throw you a bone. A better question to ask is "If the above mentioned statistics are true, WHEN and WHAT changed in the black community?"
In and when that changed, what was the underlying goal? And WHO changed it? WHY did they push that change? To what end?
What I think you'll find is a concerted effort to destroy the black community.
You have just provided many examples of the end result of 'something' yet provided nothing of value.
A classic example where someone sees the end result of something but fails to provide the equation as to how something got that way. Then instead of asking the question "why are things so?" You look for a data point that fits a pre-determined and wanting "cause".
Blacks commit the largest portion of violent crimes + states with largest black populous THEREFORE black race MUST be the cause.
Completely avoiding any question as to "why?".
Because, In your eyes, you have already reached an answer. Failing to ever recognize a very fundamental flaw. The fact that you didn't look at or entertain any underlying conditions or circumstances.
Could your initial conclusion be correct? Maybe. But we would never know since you have already made a decision.
Then you follow up with a mess load of other scenarios that were never a part of this discussion. All without much, if any, underlying data to prove said conclusions.
Once again. Statistics are ONLY arrived at as a result of 'something'. Statistics are not, in it of themselves, the causal agent.
We can certainly discuss each topic as a separate conversation but I won't entertain the simple minded regurgitation of information one has been fed.
Furthermore, your once again, pre-determined assertions on my views of illegal immigration is another example of reaching a conclusion without having an understanding of reality.
I suspect at this point, since your bent on blaming race, that you have concluded that Hispanics have voted in a majority white politician who knowingly and willingly allows the entry of said illegal.
YOU sir, are just as culpable as I, in voting these pieces of shit into office. But I suspect you'll find a way to blame someone else of another race for this atrocity also.
The fact is that we are ALL created in the image of God and if your conclusion is that God made a mistake in his creations and created those of different races with inferior attributes than those of whites than you have a bigger challenge to overcome than this Hispanic on this thread.
Maybe you should sort out your disagreement with your creator before you entertain any disagreement with a fellow sinner.
Couldn't have said it better.
But not only information but the ability to logically sift and analyze the information.
It does one no good if they hold a wealth of knowledge but little critical thinking skills to separate unrelated data points and connect seemingly unrelated data points.
It's exactly what we see here today. A wealth of information at our fingertips yet people can't sift through it let alone analyze it critically.
I mean a massive amount of studies have been performed for decades with a wealth of data points and the vast of that data pointing to economic and education levels being the predominant determinator of propensity to commit crime.
Yet people turn into neanderthals suddenly.
"Blacks and Hispanics commit most crimes. See. Look at this "X" percentage."
HEY! If it's not already obvious to you! The end percentage point is exactly that! The result of something! Not the "something"!
Black is not the cause! Hispanic is not the cause! Minority is not the cause!
Race is a box one checks on a form.
The reason why that will continue to happen. Instead of publically calling it out.
Too many black folks feel embarassed and decide to protect their ego/pride.
What makes a person a leader? Leaders tend to take ownership of something even if a team member was at fault.
The day when massive amount of black people call for putting the thugs in jail publically.
Then people will say "Ok... they are really against it".
This is why the deep state pays BLM to speak for black people. This is why they call blacks Uncle Toms who speak out against it.
Because they know if blacks come together and say "Throw the criminals in jail". It's over for the Cabal.
I think that day is closer than we think.
It's going to be glorious sir.
I agree.
People with money have more to lose by engaging in violent crime than do poor people.
But there are poor people in every racial demographic and STILL black violent crime rates are MUCH higher than in any other group.
You canNOT simply ignore that and pretend like it is not a thing.
States with the HIGHEST murder rates:
States with the highest black population:
Note: New Mexico is #1 in Hispanic population and #3 in American Indian population.
States with LOWEST murder rates:
(*) means zero murders
States with the highest White population:
Note: WV is #1 in White population, #4 in poverty rate, but only #25 in murder rate. For murder rates, Iowa is #41, Oregon is # 31, Kentucky is #15, Kansas is #28, and Nebraska is #38.
States with highest poverty rate:
https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/murder-rate-by-state
https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/black-population-by-state
https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/whitest-states
https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/hispanic-population-by-state
https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/native-american-population
https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/poverty-rate-by-state
You can claim that there is SOME association with poverty and murder (violent crime).
But there is a GREATER association with race and murder.
Perhaps race plays a role in BOTH poverty and violence, due to biological reasons moreso than societal reasons.
The student body population of Harvard University is 14% black. But that is due to racial quotas. If black students were admitted under the same requirements that White students have to abide by, then less than 1% of the Harvard student body population would be black.
This is not societal, as all students today have access to K-12 education, which is the preparation for admission to universities.
A recent medical research study was conducted to figure out why blacks have higher rates of certain illnesses than Whites (sickle cell anemia, for example). It had nothing to do with crime or poverty.
The researchers theorized the idea of a difference in testosterone or other hormone levels as a cause of difference illnesses, so they studied those.
They found that testosterone levels were similar in White males and black males, with White males slightly higher than black males, but black females much higher than White females.
However, they found that esterogen levels were significantly higher in black males than White males (and also higher in black females than White females).
They drew no conclusions from this. But I would suggest that if esterogen causes more emotional actions by females versus males, then perhaps it also helps explain why so many black males do not control their own emotional impulses. If so, this would be biological, not societal.
DEI hires unqualified people based on their skin color, not their merit.
And we have planes losing doors and wheels, and pilots complaining of greatly increased near misses of mid-air collisions due to air traffic contollers (DEI hires) not knowing WTF they are doing.
We even have audio recordings of conversations from an air traffic controller who clearly did not know WTF she was talking about, trying to chastise a pilot, who was doing what he was supposed to do.
The society is turning to shit, more and more each day. This might not be the only issue to discuss, but it IS an important one.
It should not be swept under the rug, as YOU are trying to do, and as the OP article of lying about race among violent criminals is doing.
Your own fear of talking about difficult issues only makes the problem worse.
BTW, I hear there is a need for people -- such as yourself -- to take in some illegal invaders into your home since the government cannot "afford" it anymore. How many would YOU like to house? Can we put you down for about 15? 20?
Let us know!
Those Haitian cannibals don't wanna live under a bridge, after all. They will need your warm home, your well-stocked fridge, and cruise around in your car.
You are also ignoring POST SLAVERY!
Blacks had the lowest divorce rate amoung ethnic groups. There was not a gang bang / thug criminal culture amoung blacks in the 30s / 40s.
My mom and dad are black born in 1950.
Even to them. This black thug culture is FOREIGN to them. There was no drive by shootings with blacks in the 1930s, etc.
The violent history of blacks has always been a roller caster ride of data points.
It's been an up and down thing.
Never has it been a violent bunch of thugs just killing people randomly.
The only black history that white conservative / liberals know is this dysfunctional trash history.
Why don't they teach you about Booker T Washington???
Why do they not teach more about Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams??
Once again perfectly said.
Thomas Sowell - History will prove this man an American Treasure.
Blacks (of which I am not) in the early 1900's had the lowest divorce rates, safest communities, had successful doctors and shop owners and schools, while segregated, had a higher literacy rate than that of its white counterpart. Blacks had a higher church attendance rate also. After all what do you expect lead them through slavery and into and through lynching mobs of the early 1900's if it wasn't there faith in the Lord.
Not to take away anything from heroic whites who were also lynched alongside them as they attempted to help their fellow human beings. Heroic whites who were lynched in equal numbers to blacks at the time.
This is NOT a knock on whites or any other for that matter, but an example of where MAG768720's arguments and false assumptions fail miserably.
These FACTS fly in the face of any assertion that genetic make-up contributes to propensity to commit crime.
If one were armed with this data than one could only conclude that. Genetics plays no role in propensity to commit crime or any conclusion of inferiority. One is ONLY left to continue to ask the 'why?'.
Hey MAG768720, I'll throw you a bone. A better question to ask is "If the above mentioned statistics are true, WHEN and WHAT changed in the black community?"
In and when that changed, what was the underlying goal? And WHO changed it? WHY did they push that change? To what end?
What I think you'll find is a concerted effort to destroy the black community.
Well said!
People like MAG768720 tend to base their ideas on their personal observations of what they see.
These observations will always be short sided. They do not compare time periods to establish a timeline.
Everything you have mentioned ignores the ECONOMICS behind black thugs.
You are also ignoring the truth about crimes. Black crime METHODS are DIFFERENT than white crime methods.
White men understand the power of image and perception. They understand how to use the press to HIDE their crimes.
For Example:
How many white pedos are there that don't show up as a crime stat? Why... because they know how to HIDE the crime.
What are we learning about the Cabal?
The Cabal is a deep criminal network of people that don't show up on the crime stats.
You assuming that crime stats actually covers all murder, thief, etc.
No it does not.
If you are a white computer hacker. This guy might know how to steal via using a computer and the internet. Then cover his tracks.
That would not show up as a crime stat.
And your it's the genes crap?
Haven't you notice that it's only white guys mostly making that claim? In order to prove that to avoid emotional bias.
You would need WORLD WIDE peered review science to prove that is true. You cannot just take a bunch of white guys word for it.
How would we know if they are former NAZIs making that claim?
You also need to look at crime stats in decades to compare.
So what was the black crime stats from
1900 - 1910 vs 1999 - Current
or
1920 - 1930
This is true data science. You would need to compare and contrast various datasets to form an opinion.
Also.. isn't the great awakening?
If the Cabal can destroy whites like they are doing now?
Why don't you believe that have done it to Africa and other areas?
You seem to believe that whenever destruction happens to blacks. It's because of their DNA / LOW IQ.
But when the same Cabal is doing it to whites. It's because you are a victim.
And the proverbial nail is truck square on the head!
Very simple.
Where does the black market operate? Who does the black market RECRUIT as EMPLOYEES?
You know.. the black market that brings in BILLIONS of dollar that is washed into the system.
Who do they target to work these dangerous jobs?
You have just provided many examples of the end result of 'something' yet provided nothing of value.
A classic example where someone sees the end result of something but fails to provide the equation as to how something got that way. Then instead of asking the question "why are things so?" You look for a data point that fits a pre-determined and wanting "cause".
Blacks commit the largest portion of violent crimes + states with largest black populous THEREFORE black race MUST be the cause.
Completely avoiding any question as to "why?".
Because, In your eyes, you have already reached an answer. Failing to ever recognize a very fundamental flaw. The fact that you didn't look at or entertain any underlying conditions or circumstances.
Could your initial conclusion be correct? Maybe. But we would never know since you have already made a decision.
Then you follow up with a mess load of other scenarios that were never a part of this discussion. All without much, if any, underlying data to prove said conclusions.
Once again. Statistics are ONLY arrived at as a result of 'something'. Statistics are not, in it of themselves, the causal agent.
We can certainly discuss each topic as a separate conversation but I won't entertain the simple minded regurgitation of information one has been fed.
Furthermore, your once again, pre-determined assertions on my views of illegal immigration is another example of reaching a conclusion without having an understanding of reality.
I suspect at this point, since your bent on blaming race, that you have concluded that Hispanics have voted in a majority white politician who knowingly and willingly allows the entry of said illegal.
YOU sir, are just as culpable as I, in voting these pieces of shit into office. But I suspect you'll find a way to blame someone else of another race for this atrocity also.
The fact is that we are ALL created in the image of God and if your conclusion is that God made a mistake in his creations and created those of different races with inferior attributes than those of whites than you have a bigger challenge to overcome than this Hispanic on this thread.
Maybe you should sort out your disagreement with your creator before you entertain any disagreement with a fellow sinner.
WELL SAID!!!!
WOW!!
That was fantastic!!!