If it'sa personal note, the jury has no right to view it. If it's classified, the jury has no right to view it without the proper clearances. Sounds like Cannon isn't seeing any crime being committed here based on the evidence presented and is asking a fundamental question regarding the jury's ability to view said evidence. Which is what I think the real question is with regards to investigating a former POTUS and is one of the reasons why a sitting POTUS isn't allowed to be investigated for any potential crimes they may or may not have committed. "Show me the man and I'll show you the crimes he's committed" IS NOT a valid prosecutoeial position, but Cannon is still willing to entertain a trial...most likely for the "show" if it.
...but Cannon is still willing to entertain a trial...most likely for the "show" if it.
Think in terms of Double Jeopardy. If it goes in front of a jury, judge can then rule case dismissed with prejudice if prosecution cannot provide the jury with evidence of a crime, as in, let them see the files and determine if they are covered under the Presidential Records Act or the charges under the Espionage Act can stand. Cabal does not want the contents of the docs made public because it probably implicates THEM. If Smith won't allow the jury to see the docs, case dismissed with prejudice...meaning those charges cannot be filed again. No appeal process for Smith to pursue. Done, Finito, Kaput.
Didn't Trump say he declassified all the documents he took home before he left the WH? So, if that's true, then why wouldn't the jury be able to view the documents? Kek... because Smith and the cabal don't want anyone to view those documents.
Jack Smith needs to pretend that the Presidential Records Act doesn’t say what it says. The President decides what records to keep before leaving office, not Archive officials or Jack Smith. Any disagreements are civil matters settled by a federal judge.
If it'sa personal note, the jury has no right to view it. If it's classified, the jury has no right to view it without the proper clearances. Sounds like Cannon isn't seeing any crime being committed here based on the evidence presented and is asking a fundamental question regarding the jury's ability to view said evidence. Which is what I think the real question is with regards to investigating a former POTUS and is one of the reasons why a sitting POTUS isn't allowed to be investigated for any potential crimes they may or may not have committed. "Show me the man and I'll show you the crimes he's committed" IS NOT a valid prosecutoeial position, but Cannon is still willing to entertain a trial...most likely for the "show" if it.
Think in terms of Double Jeopardy. If it goes in front of a jury, judge can then rule case dismissed with prejudice if prosecution cannot provide the jury with evidence of a crime, as in, let them see the files and determine if they are covered under the Presidential Records Act or the charges under the Espionage Act can stand. Cabal does not want the contents of the docs made public because it probably implicates THEM. If Smith won't allow the jury to see the docs, case dismissed with prejudice...meaning those charges cannot be filed again. No appeal process for Smith to pursue. Done, Finito, Kaput.
Didn't Trump say he declassified all the documents he took home before he left the WH? So, if that's true, then why wouldn't the jury be able to view the documents? Kek... because Smith and the cabal don't want anyone to view those documents.
Truer words never spoken.
Jack Smith needs to pretend that the Presidential Records Act doesn’t say what it says. The President decides what records to keep before leaving office, not Archive officials or Jack Smith. Any disagreements are civil matters settled by a federal judge.
I like your style
Thanks fren. Nice Pepe, wish I had one...
I agree with this. So what is the judge doing?
One thing that occurred to me is this might just be a way to delay because she is asking them to write up replies.
If she comes back and says jurors can read classified info, it's going to be appealed. It's eating up time