I'm going with Occam's Razor on this. Biden offered to pay because he places no value on the money itself. He doesn't care that the gov't is broke and doesn't have the money. He's also completely ignoring the fact that the shipping company is legally liable for the damages and their insurance is going to pay. Ultimately the bridge itself is owned and operated by the state of Maryland, not by the federal gov't. To the extent the feds are involved at all, it'll likely be the Army Corps of Engineers helping clear the wreckage, dredge the channel, and ensure it is passable by the super-sized container ships that need to use that harbor before work begins on a new bridge.
But, it's election season. We have a crisis, and our impotent puppet resident needs to try and look like he's in control and he's going to get things done. So, they put him in front of a camera without a suit jacket, with his sleeves rolled up so it looks like he's working, and let him run his mouth and make promises he'll never actually have to keep.
This has nothing to do with Obama taking bribes from one of likely dozens of sources to buy him off.
the shipping company is legally liable for the damages and their insurance is going to pay.
And how long will.this take. There's nothing that prevents you from building the bridge back quickly AND going after the shipper and their insurance company.
Perhaps the bridge and the port are key pieces of infrastructure and there's an economic cost to not rebuilding.
I guess I don’t understand. Almost everybody here wants the gov’t to not start rebuilding the bridge until insurance pays for it? It would be years and years and the full amount for it likely will never come. People aren’t using a lot of logic on this one and it’s so strange.
Why would insurance not be involved? This happened in Florida in 1980, sunshine skyway bridge collapse. The gov’t will of course pay for the bridge to get it built, and pursue lawsuits along with everybody else involved to get their money back, which will take years.
Imo Biden did this well his handlers did this because they can have this be a perpetual project with visibility. We are in a. Election year also which means they will funnel money to the party there will be huge cost over runs and nothing can or will be done about it because “we have to finish the bridge”
There was a post shortly after the incident saying that the Turtle's sister-in-law (the submerged Tesla casualty) was CEO of the shipping company. I'm thinking that post disappeared quickly because it lacked sauce.
Many of these Q posts are great reminders of just HOW MUCH evidence the White Hats must really have.
Boy, are the bad guys ever screwed.
Good point
How much ? NSA is / was boomerang Karma for those who thought no one else was watching , so "ALL"
It’s like having a calendar in your head wondering is this weekend suicide weekend?
I'm going with Occam's Razor on this. Biden offered to pay because he places no value on the money itself. He doesn't care that the gov't is broke and doesn't have the money. He's also completely ignoring the fact that the shipping company is legally liable for the damages and their insurance is going to pay. Ultimately the bridge itself is owned and operated by the state of Maryland, not by the federal gov't. To the extent the feds are involved at all, it'll likely be the Army Corps of Engineers helping clear the wreckage, dredge the channel, and ensure it is passable by the super-sized container ships that need to use that harbor before work begins on a new bridge.
But, it's election season. We have a crisis, and our impotent puppet resident needs to try and look like he's in control and he's going to get things done. So, they put him in front of a camera without a suit jacket, with his sleeves rolled up so it looks like he's working, and let him run his mouth and make promises he'll never actually have to keep.
This has nothing to do with Obama taking bribes from one of likely dozens of sources to buy him off.
I'm going to Occam's Razor your Occam's Razor.
And how long will.this take. There's nothing that prevents you from building the bridge back quickly AND going after the shipper and their insurance company.
Perhaps the bridge and the port are key pieces of infrastructure and there's an economic cost to not rebuilding.
I guess I don’t understand. Almost everybody here wants the gov’t to not start rebuilding the bridge until insurance pays for it? It would be years and years and the full amount for it likely will never come. People aren’t using a lot of logic on this one and it’s so strange.
Insurance companies ask questions. The taxpayers questions can be ignored.
Bingo!
Why would insurance not be involved? This happened in Florida in 1980, sunshine skyway bridge collapse. The gov’t will of course pay for the bridge to get it built, and pursue lawsuits along with everybody else involved to get their money back, which will take years.
Joe does not pay for anything, the taxpayer does.
Seize the ship! Seize it as a down payment for the bridge!
Every single container needs analysis too.
Honestly, this one is a stretch for me. I appreciate the effort, but I'm not sure this relates to the bridge attack much.
That being said, I can't wait for justice.
Imo Biden did this well his handlers did this because they can have this be a perpetual project with visibility. We are in a. Election year also which means they will funnel money to the party there will be huge cost over runs and nothing can or will be done about it because “we have to finish the bridge”
Replace the name Biden with [Obama] and replace Ukraine and China with [Singapore].
u/#q4821
u/#q4822
There was a post shortly after the incident saying that the Turtle's sister-in-law (the submerged Tesla casualty) was CEO of the shipping company. I'm thinking that post disappeared quickly because it lacked sauce.
It's false.
Thank you for confirming.
For fun? u/#q4311