The indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would unconstitutionally undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions.
Basically the Office of Legal Counsel which is the how like the law firm of the DOJ looked into this question during Watergate and issued this legal opinion.
For these reasons we believe that the Constitution requires recognition of a
presidential immunity from indictment and criminal prosecution while the President is in office.
So this seems like a contradiction in the Devolution theory. Since Trump has been indicted and facing both state and federal indictments, how can he still be the sitting president?
Some folks say well he is not the President, but the Commander in Chief.
However, the Constitution says the President is the Commander in Chief.
Article II, Section 2, Clause 1:
The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and
of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States;
he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive
Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall
have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in
Cases of Impeachment.
This plus things like Biden pulling us out of Aghanistan seems like a high hurdle to the Devolution theory for me
If you know that your government has been, or is about to be taken over, for example, by Joe Biden cheating in the election, with the help of foreign governments, devolution is the process of vesting the legitimate government into one man who then goes into exile while the invading and occupying force has its day.
The government of the US was devolved into Donald Trump. Biden is an occupying invader.
The best historical example I've seen is the Philippines in WWII.
The Law of War manual specifies the rules and procedures to be followed.
I believe the raid on Mar-a-lago was an attempt to find and confiscate the documentation proving that the government was devolved into Trump. I suspect that documentation is the Trump card.
That documentation beats EVERYTHING and will wipe the Biden administration off the face of the earth as it will prove everything under Biden was/is illegitimate.
When Biden was sworn in, it was his end. Trump won by losing, and Trump won BIG!!! Hence the motorcade and Trump's Supreme confidence.
If Trump loses in 24, he plays the Trump card and Obiden hangs. If he wins in 24, he plays the Trump card and Obiden hangs.
Cucks like you need to keep believing in the fantasy that all is well in pedoworld................. until the hammer drops and you're attacked by the fastest animal in the world.
DOJ policy. Got it.
The Office of Legal counsel within the DOJ crafted its own policy on this question. They disagree with you.
The DOJ’s policy is one that it has determined on its own. Can be changed with the stroke of a pen.
The circumstances have raised an often-asked question: Could Trump, or anyone else, be convicted of a felony and serve as commander in chief, possibly from prison? The short answer, legal experts said, is yes — because the U.S. Constitution does not forbid it.
Trump can still serve as president if he's convicted of a crimehttps://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/04/11/trump-convicted-felony-serve-president/
If devolution is correct then this is a Presidential Escort. He is CIC!
Plus that would explain why Biden can’t send troops to Ukraine. He seeemed to have support at the beginning.
He's about to go on criminal trial on Monday.
How does that play into the devolution claim?
EDIT I don't think folks are getting my reference.
The DOJ has a long standing policy since 1973 that the President cannot be indicted.
Basically the Office of Legal Counsel which is the how like the law firm of the DOJ looked into this question during Watergate and issued this legal opinion.
So this seems like a contradiction in the Devolution theory. Since Trump has been indicted and facing both state and federal indictments, how can he still be the sitting president?
Some folks say well he is not the President, but the Commander in Chief. However, the Constitution says the President is the Commander in Chief.
This plus things like Biden pulling us out of Aghanistan seems like a high hurdle to the Devolution theory for me
So obviously a shill.
Understand what devolution is.
If you know that your government has been, or is about to be taken over, for example, by Joe Biden cheating in the election, with the help of foreign governments, devolution is the process of vesting the legitimate government into one man who then goes into exile while the invading and occupying force has its day.
The government of the US was devolved into Donald Trump. Biden is an occupying invader.
The best historical example I've seen is the Philippines in WWII.
The Law of War manual specifies the rules and procedures to be followed.
I believe the raid on Mar-a-lago was an attempt to find and confiscate the documentation proving that the government was devolved into Trump. I suspect that documentation is the Trump card.
That documentation beats EVERYTHING and will wipe the Biden administration off the face of the earth as it will prove everything under Biden was/is illegitimate.
When Biden was sworn in, it was his end. Trump won by losing, and Trump won BIG!!! Hence the motorcade and Trump's Supreme confidence.
If Trump loses in 24, he plays the Trump card and Obiden hangs. If he wins in 24, he plays the Trump card and Obiden hangs.
How do you introduce evidence? Maybe try reading q
Cucks like you need to keep believing in the fantasy that all is well in pedoworld................. until the hammer drops and you're attacked by the fastest animal in the world.
....and nothing will happen
Not if we are under a foreign military occupation
doesn't
The DOJ has had a policy since Watergate that says a president can not go on trial while he is president.
So since he is going on trial, it seems he therefore he is not president.
Commander in Chief is and President are different titles for a reason.
DOJ policy. Got it. The Office of Legal counsel within the DOJ crafted its own policy on this question. They disagree with you. The DOJ’s policy is one that it has determined on its own. Can be changed with the stroke of a pen.
They'd never do that. Devolution l
Some things are part of the movie. Have you read any Q posts at all?
The DOJ has a policy that they do not interfer with an election. This shows you that the DOJ has fallen.
The circumstances have raised an often-asked question: Could Trump, or anyone else, be convicted of a felony and serve as commander in chief, possibly from prison? The short answer, legal experts said, is yes — because the U.S. Constitution does not forbid it. Trump can still serve as president if he's convicted of a crimehttps://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/04/11/trump-convicted-felony-serve-president/