Reminds me of Tuckers question to Putin about why he didn’t do more to tell the world about the U.S. blowing up Nordstream. Putins response (paraphrased) the U.S.’s hold on the western media is too strong so the cost/benefit analysis does not compute. Not worth the trouble.
Russia being a super power that's absolutely insane!!! --- that we have THAT much of an absolute grip that a nation at war does not find gaining global influence worth the cost/ benefit. Also gooes to show that news doesn't and hasn't existed in America.
That is a strong statement given the circumstances and goes to show that we really are in the Truman show, everything has been staged for us.
Reminds me of Tuckers question to Putin about why he didn’t do more to tell the world about the U.S. blowing up Nordstream. Putins response (paraphrased) the U.S.’s hold on the western media is too strong so the cost/benefit analysis does not compute. Not worth the trouble.
Russia being a super power that's absolutely insane!!! --- that we have THAT much of an absolute grip that a nation at war does not find gaining global influence worth the cost/ benefit. Also gooes to show that news doesn't and hasn't existed in America.
That is a strong statement given the circumstances and goes to show that we really are in the Truman show, everything has been staged for us.
if it were not for lies these people would have absolutely nothing to say.
"Asymmetric information."
Good term.
Media is (((their))) most powerful weapon.