JUST IN: SCOTUS Denies Kari Lake and Mark Finchem’s Lawsuit to Ban Voting Machines Without Comment
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
🤡 ELECTION CONTROL 🤡
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (51)
sorted by:
Depends on the lawsuit's exact wording... but the SCOTUS likely made the right decision in not hearing it.
Think about it. EVERY electronic machine is "hackable". Would a SCOTUS ban on electronic machines which are "hackable" also apply to electronic cash registers? or school computers? or transportation control systems? or traffic lights? or vending machines?
If just the fact that something was "hackable" means that you can't ever use it... then we can continue that argument into trashing 99% of all computer systems.
It's NOT the computer voting system that is at fault. It's the fraudulent use of it that's the problem. The states need to set up systems to monitor the voting computers, watch for any anomalies and be able to audit the electronic count manually if needed.
It's not the Supreme Court's job to simply ban voting machines, or any other machines, just because a state (or business) doesn't maintain the integrity of the system.
which actually makes it a WIN because of just the way you worded it. Every Machine is HACKABLE so therefore the only answer is handcounted paper ballots. Pass It On!
Why doesn't this ever come up in recounts though? We keep seeing that paper recounts are very close to the machine counts. How are they doing this?
The real issue is forensics. Are the ballots valid? Not folded mail in ballots? Printed filled in ovals...fake and missing signatures. Correct paper stock. And on and on. Actual forensic audits would show the immensity of the fraud. But attention spans are small and don’t allow for actual work to be done.
I thought the Cyber Ninja's did all that, checked for bamboo fibers and things like that. Was that all fake?
No; hand recounts have different outcomes. Paper counts are still done by machines like the sorters we had on Xerox machines.
After the AZ audit, it was announced that the audit resulted in even more Biden votes. But, that was because they were just announcing the recount of ballots proven to be fraudulent.
Remember the shutting down of the counting in the battleground states at 2 am? They shipped or slipped in fraudulent paper ballots to match the number of votes cast. At that point, they are part of the total ballot count, and will be checked in hand counts. Numbers will match between machine and ballot hand recounts. I still remember Rudy doing that presser (Philadelphia?) across the street from the crematorium. They burned evidence there I have no doubt!
An aside. We have the ES &S tabulators here in my county. I know there was fraud in 2020 in the presidential and congressional races. All down ballots were red and it was the first time that the presidential race went Dem (and barely.)
The ballots are scanned and underneath, any ballots deemed unreadable go into the hidden behind the curtains, “adjudicate” bin. There are two bins! As part of the scanner check before the polls open, test ballots are unsealed and run through. If the totals are good, the machine is used. BUT, it is then put into “vote” mode instead of “test” mode. Certain buttons are pressed as part of turning the machines on. Why does a scanner need a button telling it to ignore red ink? Since when is red ink ever allowed in elections? We know from the Volkswagen scandal that different code can run in test mode than in regular mode…
What if a button press activates an “Easter Egg” code sequence that makes every 3rd vote Dem and deems the ballot is unreadable, when only in vote mode? Later Dem ballots are somehow switched in for the R votes, making the numbers match. I’m just not sure how they do the latter in a largely R county with lots of R poll watchers?