I am unaware of photos of any human viruses. Bacterial viruses, or phages, yes, but not human ones. The excitement that virology felt on the advent of the electron microscope quickly turned to despair when it failed to reveal the elusive virus. Virology was on it's way out when it was resurrected by John Ender's 1957(?) paper on cell cultures, in which he claimed the observed effects on a culture proved the existence of viruses. A conclusion that was invalidated by his very own control experiment!
Since then virologists have used nothing but cell cultures for proof without ever running a control experiment! This shortcoming makes virology a pseudoscience. Additionally, the meaning of the word "isolation" had to be redefined in order to make it consistent with a cell culture tainted with things like antibiotics, and calf serum.
The fact of the matter is, the virus is much too valuable a weapon for the deep state to lose: it can't be detected by anyone like us, so we must rely on the word of experts, and tests that don't actually work as demonstrated by the plandemic. I suspect anyone who appears to be on our side, and maintains the reality of viruses to be controlled opposition. That's why I'm vary glad to see someone like Mike Yeadon come to the conclusions he has.
Genetically sequencing is as big a fraud as virology. The meaning of genetically sequencing is not what we are encouraged to believe it is. No one ever sequences an organism genome from end-to-end. Instead, short continuous segments of amino acid, or contigs, are assembled into something that satisfies the researcher's criteria from sequences mined from genomic databases. For SARS-COV-2, the criteria was the longest sequence that resembles SARS-COV-1. That's it.
In other words any sequence obtained is a puzzle solved by computer, based on other sequences that were assembled in the same way. A sequence thus obtained is almost guaranteed to have no bases in reality whatsoever (I make an exception for very short sequences). It is fraud all the way down.
I know because the first year of my Comp Sci doctorate was spent working in bioinformatics -- the application of software algorithms and heuristics to biology. Most notably gene sequencing.
Excellent post. This is where I now am. There may be submicroscopic particles that cause disease but their ability to jump from sick host to infect a healthy victim is ludicrous. When I saw the UK government’s own website admit that there is no known case of rabies ever spreading between humans, while researching viruses and contagion, allegedly one of the most infectious diseases, this was a big clue… Heck, even Merck have been allegedly calling viruses tiny parasites for over 60 years…
Both the fields of virology and infectious disease are filled with inconsistencies and things that make you go, "hmm." But only if you're a critical thinker. Well done.
What are all of those virus pictures ----- pictures of?
isn't it documented that these multiply?
Now you're asking the right questions.
Who knows what the truth is! After covid I don't what to think.
I am unaware of photos of any human viruses. Bacterial viruses, or phages, yes, but not human ones. The excitement that virology felt on the advent of the electron microscope quickly turned to despair when it failed to reveal the elusive virus. Virology was on it's way out when it was resurrected by John Ender's 1957(?) paper on cell cultures, in which he claimed the observed effects on a culture proved the existence of viruses. A conclusion that was invalidated by his very own control experiment!
Since then virologists have used nothing but cell cultures for proof without ever running a control experiment! This shortcoming makes virology a pseudoscience. Additionally, the meaning of the word "isolation" had to be redefined in order to make it consistent with a cell culture tainted with things like antibiotics, and calf serum.
The fact of the matter is, the virus is much too valuable a weapon for the deep state to lose: it can't be detected by anyone like us, so we must rely on the word of experts, and tests that don't actually work as demonstrated by the plandemic. I suspect anyone who appears to be on our side, and maintains the reality of viruses to be controlled opposition. That's why I'm vary glad to see someone like Mike Yeadon come to the conclusions he has.
Viruses have been genetically sequenced.
The man-made covid sequence has a US patent on it.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US7220852B1/en
Genetically sequencing is as big a fraud as virology. The meaning of genetically sequencing is not what we are encouraged to believe it is. No one ever sequences an organism genome from end-to-end. Instead, short continuous segments of amino acid, or contigs, are assembled into something that satisfies the researcher's criteria from sequences mined from genomic databases. For SARS-COV-2, the criteria was the longest sequence that resembles SARS-COV-1. That's it.
In other words any sequence obtained is a puzzle solved by computer, based on other sequences that were assembled in the same way. A sequence thus obtained is almost guaranteed to have no bases in reality whatsoever (I make an exception for very short sequences). It is fraud all the way down.
I know because the first year of my Comp Sci doctorate was spent working in bioinformatics -- the application of software algorithms and heuristics to biology. Most notably gene sequencing.
https://www.science.org/content/article/poliovirus-baked-scratch
Excellent post. This is where I now am. There may be submicroscopic particles that cause disease but their ability to jump from sick host to infect a healthy victim is ludicrous. When I saw the UK government’s own website admit that there is no known case of rabies ever spreading between humans, while researching viruses and contagion, allegedly one of the most infectious diseases, this was a big clue… Heck, even Merck have been allegedly calling viruses tiny parasites for over 60 years…
https://twitter.com/Linda4CVINE/status/1773323207207977312
Both the fields of virology and infectious disease are filled with inconsistencies and things that make you go, "hmm." But only if you're a critical thinker. Well done.