Darn, I was hoping he would explain why colds and flu seem to spread through schools, work places, and households if they are not contagious. I mean, is it psychological? They see someone sick and then their brain tells them that they, too, are sick? Personally, I've never caught anything from a classmate, co-worker, or family member but other people seem to. I've gotten sick after caring for a sick family member but I've always attributed it to me getting worn down from work, household chores, and tending to the ill family member.
I think a lot of it is the power of suggestion. I worked with liberal teachers/before covid, and they were always 'sick' would complain constantly. I know it's much worse now because they can fall back on 'long covid'🙄
remember Q asked us; What is a spell?...words have power that's how a bunch of weak souls could take over our world with their 'media' brainwashing.
May need to consider that the "symptoms" we call "being sick" may simply be our bodies method of cyclical detoxing. And the signals our bodies use to communicate the detox processes with other cells within our body very well may be signaling the same process in other people who may be within our vicinity.
Plants communicate with each other. Women's cycles end up synchronizing with each other after a while. There may well be an entirely different mechanism at work with dis-ease, and we would never know it since we've been brainwashed with Germ Theory since birth.
I am unaware of photos of any human viruses. Bacterial viruses, or phages, yes, but not human ones. The excitement that virology felt on the advent of the electron microscope quickly turned to despair when it failed to reveal the elusive virus. Virology was on it's way out when it was resurrected by John Ender's 1957(?) paper on cell cultures, in which he claimed the observed effects on a culture proved the existence of viruses. A conclusion that was invalidated by his very own control experiment!
Since then virologists have used nothing but cell cultures for proof without ever running a control experiment! This shortcoming makes virology a pseudoscience. Additionally, the meaning of the word "isolation" had to be redefined in order to make it consistent with a cell culture tainted with things like antibiotics, and calf serum.
The fact of the matter is, the virus is much too valuable a weapon for the deep state to lose: it can't be detected by anyone like us, so we must rely on the word of experts, and tests that don't actually work as demonstrated by the plandemic. I suspect anyone who appears to be on our side, and maintains the reality of viruses to be controlled opposition. That's why I'm vary glad to see someone like Mike Yeadon come to the conclusions he has.
Genetically sequencing is as big a fraud as virology. The meaning of genetically sequencing is not what we are encouraged to believe it is. No one ever sequences an organism genome from end-to-end. Instead, short continuous segments of amino acid, or contigs, are assembled into something that satisfies the researcher's criteria from sequences mined from genomic databases. For SARS-COV-2, the criteria was the longest sequence that resembles SARS-COV-1. That's it.
In other words any sequence obtained is a puzzle solved by computer, based on other sequences that were assembled in the same way. A sequence thus obtained is almost guaranteed to have no bases in reality whatsoever (I make an exception for very short sequences). It is fraud all the way down.
I know because the first year of my Comp Sci doctorate was spent working in bioinformatics -- the application of software algorithms and heuristics to biology. Most notably gene sequencing.
Excellent post. This is where I now am. There may be submicroscopic particles that cause disease but their ability to jump from sick host to infect a healthy victim is ludicrous. When I saw the UK government’s own website admit that there is no known case of rabies ever spreading between humans, while researching viruses and contagion, allegedly one of the most infectious diseases, this was a big clue… Heck, even Merck have been allegedly calling viruses tiny parasites for over 60 years…
Both the fields of virology and infectious disease are filled with inconsistencies and things that make you go, "hmm." But only if you're a critical thinker. Well done.
Good interview. I wish I could read a book but you know that long covid . . .
Just kidding! Lifetime of psych meds has ruined my ability to focus. So I really appreciate hearing the interview. Thank you!
Darn, I was hoping he would explain why colds and flu seem to spread through schools, work places, and households if they are not contagious. I mean, is it psychological? They see someone sick and then their brain tells them that they, too, are sick? Personally, I've never caught anything from a classmate, co-worker, or family member but other people seem to. I've gotten sick after caring for a sick family member but I've always attributed it to me getting worn down from work, household chores, and tending to the ill family member.
I think a lot of it is the power of suggestion. I worked with liberal teachers/before covid, and they were always 'sick' would complain constantly. I know it's much worse now because they can fall back on 'long covid'🙄
remember Q asked us; What is a spell?...words have power that's how a bunch of weak souls could take over our world with their 'media' brainwashing.
May need to consider that the "symptoms" we call "being sick" may simply be our bodies method of cyclical detoxing. And the signals our bodies use to communicate the detox processes with other cells within our body very well may be signaling the same process in other people who may be within our vicinity.
Plants communicate with each other. Women's cycles end up synchronizing with each other after a while. There may well be an entirely different mechanism at work with dis-ease, and we would never know it since we've been brainwashed with Germ Theory since birth.
What are all of those virus pictures ----- pictures of?
isn't it documented that these multiply?
Now you're asking the right questions.
Who knows what the truth is! After covid I don't what to think.
I am unaware of photos of any human viruses. Bacterial viruses, or phages, yes, but not human ones. The excitement that virology felt on the advent of the electron microscope quickly turned to despair when it failed to reveal the elusive virus. Virology was on it's way out when it was resurrected by John Ender's 1957(?) paper on cell cultures, in which he claimed the observed effects on a culture proved the existence of viruses. A conclusion that was invalidated by his very own control experiment!
Since then virologists have used nothing but cell cultures for proof without ever running a control experiment! This shortcoming makes virology a pseudoscience. Additionally, the meaning of the word "isolation" had to be redefined in order to make it consistent with a cell culture tainted with things like antibiotics, and calf serum.
The fact of the matter is, the virus is much too valuable a weapon for the deep state to lose: it can't be detected by anyone like us, so we must rely on the word of experts, and tests that don't actually work as demonstrated by the plandemic. I suspect anyone who appears to be on our side, and maintains the reality of viruses to be controlled opposition. That's why I'm vary glad to see someone like Mike Yeadon come to the conclusions he has.
Viruses have been genetically sequenced.
The man-made covid sequence has a US patent on it.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US7220852B1/en
Genetically sequencing is as big a fraud as virology. The meaning of genetically sequencing is not what we are encouraged to believe it is. No one ever sequences an organism genome from end-to-end. Instead, short continuous segments of amino acid, or contigs, are assembled into something that satisfies the researcher's criteria from sequences mined from genomic databases. For SARS-COV-2, the criteria was the longest sequence that resembles SARS-COV-1. That's it.
In other words any sequence obtained is a puzzle solved by computer, based on other sequences that were assembled in the same way. A sequence thus obtained is almost guaranteed to have no bases in reality whatsoever (I make an exception for very short sequences). It is fraud all the way down.
I know because the first year of my Comp Sci doctorate was spent working in bioinformatics -- the application of software algorithms and heuristics to biology. Most notably gene sequencing.
Excellent post. This is where I now am. There may be submicroscopic particles that cause disease but their ability to jump from sick host to infect a healthy victim is ludicrous. When I saw the UK government’s own website admit that there is no known case of rabies ever spreading between humans, while researching viruses and contagion, allegedly one of the most infectious diseases, this was a big clue… Heck, even Merck have been allegedly calling viruses tiny parasites for over 60 years…
https://twitter.com/Linda4CVINE/status/1773323207207977312
Both the fields of virology and infectious disease are filled with inconsistencies and things that make you go, "hmm." But only if you're a critical thinker. Well done.
You hit the nail on the head in your ending. Worn down
Well, the clue may be in the name… influenza… influence… I highly recommend a great book on the topic: here is the author being interviewed by Sam Bailey… https://drsambailey.substack.com/p/dan-roytas-can-you-catch-a-cold
Good interview. I wish I could read a book but you know that long covid . . .
Just kidding! Lifetime of psych meds has ruined my ability to focus. So I really appreciate hearing the interview. Thank you!