Who are you and what did you do with bubble_bursts? LOL
"there is no basis for claiming "chemtrails" exist." ???
To the contrary.
I must ask who is that convinced you chemtrails do not exist?
Was it a government scientist? The same scientists trying to convince you that global warming is a threat to humanity? Harvard or Yale environmental professors? Same people who tried to convince you the vaccines were safe and effective? "Trust the science!"
Would there be a concerted effort by clandestine groups to convince the public that chemtrails are imaginary if it could be considered a crime against humanity and they were trying to avoid accountability? I would say yes.
We live with fact checkers like Snopes who have been shown to be bias, always pushing public attention away from the truth. Do you not think there are a group of upper level, government paid fact checkers with scientific backgrounds who could make a convincing argument that the white lines are normal contrails?
I am old enough to remember the times when white streaks across the sky did not exist. I have been following chemtrail theories since they started. Read many water sample reports analyzing the chemical compounds that are being found in remote pounds and lakes. Ya, the fact checkers always have an excuse as to why barium, strontium and aluminum is being found in concentrations that are hundreds of time normal levels and they are paid to make you question how it got there.
I think we have seen enough misdirection and lies in recent years from people who we were told to trust to come up with our own rational conclusions. If they are trying to poison us with a dozen different methods, why should we eliminate the air we breathe?
Can I just ask a couple questions as I’ve been confronted here on this hot topic a few times…
Why are you asking anons to prove without a shadow of a doubt that chemtrails are real?
This is a thread where an anon posted a video of Tucker Carlson. In fact this site is my only source of news, I wouldn’t have seen it elsewhere. I don’t follow people on YouTube or X etc.
Again, Tucker is posted here all the time, and it’s pretty obvious here he is being slick in his words and almost agreeing with what she says with questions.
For example the way he pauses her and says “wait so what are chemtrails?” In his questioning voice.
She says the whole “well that’s a little deep” and he chuckles “well hey most of these conspiracy’s turn out to be true!”
Then he completely throws away this act as he agrees with her. As she describes seeing the X and the clouds he says “YES!” not “huh? What?” Or “contrails you mean?”
Then the ultimate wink and nod that he knows exactly what she is talking about, and perhaps even knows to be true.
“I don’t think people look at the sky anymore…. I think people are looking at their iPhones so they don’t notice…” then laughs as he says people aren’t stargazing.
So reading in between the lines what is he implying? SHOULD people be looking at the sky? If so looking for WHAT? What does he think they are MISSING?
THEN he says how did you get into that? “Like NOTICING THINGS AROUND YOU AND WONDERING WHAT THEY ARE?”
So my questions are, should we be discussing if Tucker is a shill? Should we be discussing why Tucker shouldn’t entertain this or is wrong because we can’t prove it here? Should we NOT post Tucker who seems to be hitting all types of fringe conspiracy ideas as of late?
When the Govt was going UFO crazy I believe TUCKER made some VERY FRINGE and intriguing episodes that circulated here heavily.
I don’t remember ever seeing a mod post and then arguing over wether or not it could be PROVEN, wether or not alien tech could be proven.
So why can’t we post and discuss Tucker on weather mods but we can talk anything else Tucker, aliens, religion, I believe he even touched on some nephilim stuff with Barr etc…..
It seems the majority of the post is you saying “here’s what they say they are doing and here’s why it can’t be happening”
The majority of my post is tldr Tucker Carlson posted the video, he doesn’t make claim either way what the guest is saying, but I suppose the whole point of his show is letting people make this fringe claims and not being told they can’t say these things.
I think it’s really telling at the end how he says
“Like NOTICING THINGS AROUND YOU AND WONDERING WHAT THEY ARE?”
He is essentially saying no you’re not a conspiracy theorist, you’re just looking at your environment and noticing.
If I had to guess, I would say I started noticing the lines aprox 20 years ago, perhaps 25.
As a child, neighborhood friends would lay in the grass, often, and try to make shapes out of the passing clouds. Skies were always a bright blue, bright white clouds. Today, the skies are never a bright blue, they always have a white haze, even on the days without the lines. If you look at your horizon, even on a clear day, you will see the haze in the air.
You point out photos of persistent contrails from 1950's. That my friend would be an example of a plane dropping fuel in a risky landing situation where the plane was having flight complications. Those did not happen on a daily basis. There may be photos from the 50's but those were rare situations and cannot be used to explain every day occurrences.
You point out photos of persistent contrails from 1950's
Oh boy. I didn't think you were one of these people fren. Really? You did not even bother to ask me to show you the picture before jumping in with "That my friend would be an example of a plane dropping fuel in a risky landing situation where the plane was having flight complications".
Does this look like a plane making a risky landing? How many times did it make a risky landing? Or rather how many planed did this risky landing ?
Who are you and what did you do with bubble_bursts? LOL
"there is no basis for claiming "chemtrails" exist." ???
To the contrary.
I must ask who is that convinced you chemtrails do not exist?
Was it a government scientist? The same scientists trying to convince you that global warming is a threat to humanity? Harvard or Yale environmental professors? Same people who tried to convince you the vaccines were safe and effective? "Trust the science!"
Would there be a concerted effort by clandestine groups to convince the public that chemtrails are imaginary if it could be considered a crime against humanity and they were trying to avoid accountability? I would say yes.
We live with fact checkers like Snopes who have been shown to be bias, always pushing public attention away from the truth. Do you not think there are a group of upper level, government paid fact checkers with scientific backgrounds who could make a convincing argument that the white lines are normal contrails?
I am old enough to remember the times when white streaks across the sky did not exist. I have been following chemtrail theories since they started. Read many water sample reports analyzing the chemical compounds that are being found in remote pounds and lakes. Ya, the fact checkers always have an excuse as to why barium, strontium and aluminum is being found in concentrations that are hundreds of time normal levels and they are paid to make you question how it got there.
I think we have seen enough misdirection and lies in recent years from people who we were told to trust to come up with our own rational conclusions. If they are trying to poison us with a dozen different methods, why should we eliminate the air we breathe?
Tell me, in your mind in which decade did these white streaks across the sky started?
Can I just ask a couple questions as I’ve been confronted here on this hot topic a few times…
Why are you asking anons to prove without a shadow of a doubt that chemtrails are real?
This is a thread where an anon posted a video of Tucker Carlson. In fact this site is my only source of news, I wouldn’t have seen it elsewhere. I don’t follow people on YouTube or X etc.
Again, Tucker is posted here all the time, and it’s pretty obvious here he is being slick in his words and almost agreeing with what she says with questions.
For example the way he pauses her and says “wait so what are chemtrails?” In his questioning voice.
She says the whole “well that’s a little deep” and he chuckles “well hey most of these conspiracy’s turn out to be true!”
Then he completely throws away this act as he agrees with her. As she describes seeing the X and the clouds he says “YES!” not “huh? What?” Or “contrails you mean?”
Then the ultimate wink and nod that he knows exactly what she is talking about, and perhaps even knows to be true.
“I don’t think people look at the sky anymore…. I think people are looking at their iPhones so they don’t notice…” then laughs as he says people aren’t stargazing.
So reading in between the lines what is he implying? SHOULD people be looking at the sky? If so looking for WHAT? What does he think they are MISSING?
THEN he says how did you get into that? “Like NOTICING THINGS AROUND YOU AND WONDERING WHAT THEY ARE?”
So my questions are, should we be discussing if Tucker is a shill? Should we be discussing why Tucker shouldn’t entertain this or is wrong because we can’t prove it here? Should we NOT post Tucker who seems to be hitting all types of fringe conspiracy ideas as of late?
When the Govt was going UFO crazy I believe TUCKER made some VERY FRINGE and intriguing episodes that circulated here heavily.
I don’t remember ever seeing a mod post and then arguing over wether or not it could be PROVEN, wether or not alien tech could be proven.
So why can’t we post and discuss Tucker on weather mods but we can talk anything else Tucker, aliens, religion, I believe he even touched on some nephilim stuff with Barr etc…..
Where did I say this? Did you read my full post? Did you read the very first line? What did I say about making claims that I said what I did not say?
I’ve just read it all. Maybe I misread.
It seems the majority of the post is you saying “here’s what they say they are doing and here’s why it can’t be happening”
The majority of my post is tldr Tucker Carlson posted the video, he doesn’t make claim either way what the guest is saying, but I suppose the whole point of his show is letting people make this fringe claims and not being told they can’t say these things.
I think it’s really telling at the end how he says
“Like NOTICING THINGS AROUND YOU AND WONDERING WHAT THEY ARE?”
He is essentially saying no you’re not a conspiracy theorist, you’re just looking at your environment and noticing.
And where did I say you should not post Tucker ? The fact that it is up and being discussed should already answer the question.
If I had to guess, I would say I started noticing the lines aprox 20 years ago, perhaps 25.
As a child, neighborhood friends would lay in the grass, often, and try to make shapes out of the passing clouds. Skies were always a bright blue, bright white clouds. Today, the skies are never a bright blue, they always have a white haze, even on the days without the lines. If you look at your horizon, even on a clear day, you will see the haze in the air.
You point out photos of persistent contrails from 1950's. That my friend would be an example of a plane dropping fuel in a risky landing situation where the plane was having flight complications. Those did not happen on a daily basis. There may be photos from the 50's but those were rare situations and cannot be used to explain every day occurrences.
Oh boy. I didn't think you were one of these people fren. Really? You did not even bother to ask me to show you the picture before jumping in with "That my friend would be an example of a plane dropping fuel in a risky landing situation where the plane was having flight complications".
Does this look like a plane making a risky landing? How many times did it make a risky landing? Or rather how many planed did this risky landing ?
https://imgur.com/a/tY6NuTK
From the book Cloud studies in colour
If you call them chemTrails it’s debunked. It’s 1984 and words matter. Cloud seeding is an approved name.