Can I just ask a couple questions as I’ve been confronted here on this hot topic a few times…
Why are you asking anons to prove without a shadow of a doubt that chemtrails are real?
This is a thread where an anon posted a video of Tucker Carlson. In fact this site is my only source of news, I wouldn’t have seen it elsewhere. I don’t follow people on YouTube or X etc.
Again, Tucker is posted here all the time, and it’s pretty obvious here he is being slick in his words and almost agreeing with what she says with questions.
For example the way he pauses her and says “wait so what are chemtrails?” In his questioning voice.
She says the whole “well that’s a little deep” and he chuckles “well hey most of these conspiracy’s turn out to be true!”
Then he completely throws away this act as he agrees with her. As she describes seeing the X and the clouds he says “YES!” not “huh? What?” Or “contrails you mean?”
Then the ultimate wink and nod that he knows exactly what she is talking about, and perhaps even knows to be true.
“I don’t think people look at the sky anymore…. I think people are looking at their iPhones so they don’t notice…” then laughs as he says people aren’t stargazing.
So reading in between the lines what is he implying? SHOULD people be looking at the sky? If so looking for WHAT? What does he think they are MISSING?
THEN he says how did you get into that? “Like NOTICING THINGS AROUND YOU AND WONDERING WHAT THEY ARE?”
So my questions are, should we be discussing if Tucker is a shill? Should we be discussing why Tucker shouldn’t entertain this or is wrong because we can’t prove it here? Should we NOT post Tucker who seems to be hitting all types of fringe conspiracy ideas as of late?
When the Govt was going UFO crazy I believe TUCKER made some VERY FRINGE and intriguing episodes that circulated here heavily.
I don’t remember ever seeing a mod post and then arguing over wether or not it could be PROVEN, wether or not alien tech could be proven.
So why can’t we post and discuss Tucker on weather mods but we can talk anything else Tucker, aliens, religion, I believe he even touched on some nephilim stuff with Barr etc…..
It seems the majority of the post is you saying “here’s what they say they are doing and here’s why it can’t be happening”
The majority of my post is tldr Tucker Carlson posted the video, he doesn’t make claim either way what the guest is saying, but I suppose the whole point of his show is letting people make this fringe claims and not being told they can’t say these things.
I think it’s really telling at the end how he says
“Like NOTICING THINGS AROUND YOU AND WONDERING WHAT THEY ARE?”
He is essentially saying no you’re not a conspiracy theorist, you’re just looking at your environment and noticing.
Now that we have cleared the "without a shadow of doubt" confusion, do you agree that as anons, we need to have standards where there needs to be some evidence beyond "I used to see no persistent contrails, but now I see it all the time" ? Because persistent contrails have been document in books as far back as 50s.
As far as Tucker is concerned - (and this applies to Elon Musk and everyone else as well) - we have to always keep our ears open to see if he is showing his true colors.
But in this case, its even more simple. Tucker had a guest who talked about it and he indicated that he doesn't know about it and she even indicated that it falls into the conspiracy theory realm.
Nowhere in this exchange is there any. reason to believe. "Tucker is saying this is real". My read is that this is the first time Tucker heard about it.
Hence the discussions. I was hoping to see how much evidence anons can dig up that backs the claims of chemtrails. However all everyone is doing is getting offended that I said something that goes against their belief system
If I had to guess, I would say I started noticing the lines aprox 20 years ago, perhaps 25.
As a child, neighborhood friends would lay in the grass, often, and try to make shapes out of the passing clouds. Skies were always a bright blue, bright white clouds. Today, the skies are never a bright blue, they always have a white haze, even on the days without the lines. If you look at your horizon, even on a clear day, you will see the haze in the air.
You point out photos of persistent contrails from 1950's. That my friend would be an example of a plane dropping fuel in a risky landing situation where the plane was having flight complications. Those did not happen on a daily basis. There may be photos from the 50's but those were rare situations and cannot be used to explain every day occurrences.
You point out photos of persistent contrails from 1950's
Oh boy. I didn't think you were one of these people fren. Really? You did not even bother to ask me to show you the picture before jumping in with "That my friend would be an example of a plane dropping fuel in a risky landing situation where the plane was having flight complications".
Does this look like a plane making a risky landing? How many times did it make a risky landing? Or rather how many planed did this risky landing ?
Tell me, in your mind in which decade did these white streaks across the sky started?
Can I just ask a couple questions as I’ve been confronted here on this hot topic a few times…
Why are you asking anons to prove without a shadow of a doubt that chemtrails are real?
This is a thread where an anon posted a video of Tucker Carlson. In fact this site is my only source of news, I wouldn’t have seen it elsewhere. I don’t follow people on YouTube or X etc.
Again, Tucker is posted here all the time, and it’s pretty obvious here he is being slick in his words and almost agreeing with what she says with questions.
For example the way he pauses her and says “wait so what are chemtrails?” In his questioning voice.
She says the whole “well that’s a little deep” and he chuckles “well hey most of these conspiracy’s turn out to be true!”
Then he completely throws away this act as he agrees with her. As she describes seeing the X and the clouds he says “YES!” not “huh? What?” Or “contrails you mean?”
Then the ultimate wink and nod that he knows exactly what she is talking about, and perhaps even knows to be true.
“I don’t think people look at the sky anymore…. I think people are looking at their iPhones so they don’t notice…” then laughs as he says people aren’t stargazing.
So reading in between the lines what is he implying? SHOULD people be looking at the sky? If so looking for WHAT? What does he think they are MISSING?
THEN he says how did you get into that? “Like NOTICING THINGS AROUND YOU AND WONDERING WHAT THEY ARE?”
So my questions are, should we be discussing if Tucker is a shill? Should we be discussing why Tucker shouldn’t entertain this or is wrong because we can’t prove it here? Should we NOT post Tucker who seems to be hitting all types of fringe conspiracy ideas as of late?
When the Govt was going UFO crazy I believe TUCKER made some VERY FRINGE and intriguing episodes that circulated here heavily.
I don’t remember ever seeing a mod post and then arguing over wether or not it could be PROVEN, wether or not alien tech could be proven.
So why can’t we post and discuss Tucker on weather mods but we can talk anything else Tucker, aliens, religion, I believe he even touched on some nephilim stuff with Barr etc…..
Where did I say this? Did you read my full post? Did you read the very first line? What did I say about making claims that I said what I did not say?
I’ve just read it all. Maybe I misread.
It seems the majority of the post is you saying “here’s what they say they are doing and here’s why it can’t be happening”
The majority of my post is tldr Tucker Carlson posted the video, he doesn’t make claim either way what the guest is saying, but I suppose the whole point of his show is letting people make this fringe claims and not being told they can’t say these things.
I think it’s really telling at the end how he says
“Like NOTICING THINGS AROUND YOU AND WONDERING WHAT THEY ARE?”
He is essentially saying no you’re not a conspiracy theorist, you’re just looking at your environment and noticing.
Now that we have cleared the "without a shadow of doubt" confusion, do you agree that as anons, we need to have standards where there needs to be some evidence beyond "I used to see no persistent contrails, but now I see it all the time" ? Because persistent contrails have been document in books as far back as 50s.
As far as Tucker is concerned - (and this applies to Elon Musk and everyone else as well) - we have to always keep our ears open to see if he is showing his true colors.
But in this case, its even more simple. Tucker had a guest who talked about it and he indicated that he doesn't know about it and she even indicated that it falls into the conspiracy theory realm.
Nowhere in this exchange is there any. reason to believe. "Tucker is saying this is real". My read is that this is the first time Tucker heard about it.
Hence the discussions. I was hoping to see how much evidence anons can dig up that backs the claims of chemtrails. However all everyone is doing is getting offended that I said something that goes against their belief system
And where did I say you should not post Tucker ? The fact that it is up and being discussed should already answer the question.
If I had to guess, I would say I started noticing the lines aprox 20 years ago, perhaps 25.
As a child, neighborhood friends would lay in the grass, often, and try to make shapes out of the passing clouds. Skies were always a bright blue, bright white clouds. Today, the skies are never a bright blue, they always have a white haze, even on the days without the lines. If you look at your horizon, even on a clear day, you will see the haze in the air.
You point out photos of persistent contrails from 1950's. That my friend would be an example of a plane dropping fuel in a risky landing situation where the plane was having flight complications. Those did not happen on a daily basis. There may be photos from the 50's but those were rare situations and cannot be used to explain every day occurrences.
Oh boy. I didn't think you were one of these people fren. Really? You did not even bother to ask me to show you the picture before jumping in with "That my friend would be an example of a plane dropping fuel in a risky landing situation where the plane was having flight complications".
Does this look like a plane making a risky landing? How many times did it make a risky landing? Or rather how many planed did this risky landing ?
https://imgur.com/a/tY6NuTK
From the book Cloud studies in colour