ADDED: Folks, before you reply to this, do me a favour and read what I wrote fully. If you want to argue with me, do so in good faith and don't claim or infer I wrote something I did not write.
I think too many people confuse geo-engineering with "chemtrails". I am glad she said "Its a bit of conspiracy theory" and I do wish someone like Tucker handles this head on. Its not that hard to break it down.
[Cloud Seeding] - This is the most common thing that people claim is "chemtrails" but it happens at much lower altitude, and sprays Silver Iodide right into a forming storm system. No heavy metals in this. It does not explain the "chemtrails" as people claim the contrails
This seems to be the latest Research that concludes that this requires modification to civilian aircraft.
No one has been able to provide any evidence of this being deployed, or the modifications made to aircraft in large numbers to claim this explains the "chemtrails".
Alternate theories proposed by some theorists is that jet fuel is modified to add heavy metals that stays in the sky. Again, no one can provide any scientific foundation for this.
Final aspect is shooting mirrors into the sky. Again, I see a lot of talk about it, but cant seem to find anything concrete.
So ultimately folks, unless someone can provide either evidence for clandestine modifications of the planes, fuel etc, what you see in the sky is simply contrails.
That does not mean all these geo-engineering programs are benign. Who knows what happens if you inject SO2 into the stratosphere?
Does this mean they not poisoning us in a million ways? Of course they are.
BUT sadly all this is now encompassed under the term "chemtrails" which is like Flat Earth, is most probably a clown op to make us look stupid when we try to expose climate modification programs because anyone who does a bit of digging will realise there is no basis for claiming "chemtrails" exist.
Who are you and what did you do with bubble_bursts? LOL
"there is no basis for claiming "chemtrails" exist." ???
To the contrary.
I must ask who is that convinced you chemtrails do not exist?
Was it a government scientist? The same scientists trying to convince you that global warming is a threat to humanity? Harvard or Yale environmental professors? Same people who tried to convince you the vaccines were safe and effective? "Trust the science!"
Would there be a concerted effort by clandestine groups to convince the public that chemtrails are imaginary if it could be considered a crime against humanity and they were trying to avoid accountability? I would say yes.
We live with fact checkers like Snopes who have been shown to be bias, always pushing public attention away from the truth. Do you not think there are a group of upper level, government paid fact checkers with scientific backgrounds who could make a convincing argument that the white lines are normal contrails?
I am old enough to remember the times when white streaks across the sky did not exist. I have been following chemtrail theories since they started. Read many water sample reports analyzing the chemical compounds that are being found in remote pounds and lakes. Ya, the fact checkers always have an excuse as to why barium, strontium and aluminum is being found in concentrations that are hundreds of time normal levels and they are paid to make you question how it got there.
I think we have seen enough misdirection and lies in recent years from people who we were told to trust to come up with our own rational conclusions. If they are trying to poison us with a dozen different methods, why should we eliminate the air we breathe?
Can I just ask a couple questions as I’ve been confronted here on this hot topic a few times…
Why are you asking anons to prove without a shadow of a doubt that chemtrails are real?
This is a thread where an anon posted a video of Tucker Carlson. In fact this site is my only source of news, I wouldn’t have seen it elsewhere. I don’t follow people on YouTube or X etc.
Again, Tucker is posted here all the time, and it’s pretty obvious here he is being slick in his words and almost agreeing with what she says with questions.
For example the way he pauses her and says “wait so what are chemtrails?” In his questioning voice.
She says the whole “well that’s a little deep” and he chuckles “well hey most of these conspiracy’s turn out to be true!”
Then he completely throws away this act as he agrees with her. As she describes seeing the X and the clouds he says “YES!” not “huh? What?” Or “contrails you mean?”
Then the ultimate wink and nod that he knows exactly what she is talking about, and perhaps even knows to be true.
“I don’t think people look at the sky anymore…. I think people are looking at their iPhones so they don’t notice…” then laughs as he says people aren’t stargazing.
So reading in between the lines what is he implying? SHOULD people be looking at the sky? If so looking for WHAT? What does he think they are MISSING?
THEN he says how did you get into that? “Like NOTICING THINGS AROUND YOU AND WONDERING WHAT THEY ARE?”
So my questions are, should we be discussing if Tucker is a shill? Should we be discussing why Tucker shouldn’t entertain this or is wrong because we can’t prove it here? Should we NOT post Tucker who seems to be hitting all types of fringe conspiracy ideas as of late?
When the Govt was going UFO crazy I believe TUCKER made some VERY FRINGE and intriguing episodes that circulated here heavily.
I don’t remember ever seeing a mod post and then arguing over wether or not it could be PROVEN, wether or not alien tech could be proven.
So why can’t we post and discuss Tucker on weather mods but we can talk anything else Tucker, aliens, religion, I believe he even touched on some nephilim stuff with Barr etc…..
ADDED: Folks, before you reply to this, do me a favour and read what I wrote fully. If you want to argue with me, do so in good faith and don't claim or infer I wrote something I did not write.
I think too many people confuse geo-engineering with "chemtrails". I am glad she said "Its a bit of conspiracy theory" and I do wish someone like Tucker handles this head on. Its not that hard to break it down.
[Cloud Seeding] - This is the most common thing that people claim is "chemtrails" but it happens at much lower altitude, and sprays Silver Iodide right into a forming storm system. No heavy metals in this. It does not explain the "chemtrails" as people claim the contrails
Stratospheric Aerosol Injection - by injecting aerosols into the stratosphere, mainly SO2. No heavy metals in this as well.
This seems to be the latest Research that concludes that this requires modification to civilian aircraft.
No one has been able to provide any evidence of this being deployed, or the modifications made to aircraft in large numbers to claim this explains the "chemtrails".
Alternate theories proposed by some theorists is that jet fuel is modified to add heavy metals that stays in the sky. Again, no one can provide any scientific foundation for this.
Final aspect is shooting mirrors into the sky. Again, I see a lot of talk about it, but cant seem to find anything concrete.
So ultimately folks, unless someone can provide either evidence for clandestine modifications of the planes, fuel etc, what you see in the sky is simply contrails.
That does not mean all these geo-engineering programs are benign. Who knows what happens if you inject SO2 into the stratosphere?
Does this mean they not poisoning us in a million ways? Of course they are.
BUT sadly all this is now encompassed under the term "chemtrails" which is like Flat Earth, is most probably a clown op to make us look stupid when we try to expose climate modification programs because anyone who does a bit of digging will realise there is no basis for claiming "chemtrails" exist.
Who are you and what did you do with bubble_bursts? LOL
"there is no basis for claiming "chemtrails" exist." ???
To the contrary.
I must ask who is that convinced you chemtrails do not exist?
Was it a government scientist? The same scientists trying to convince you that global warming is a threat to humanity? Harvard or Yale environmental professors? Same people who tried to convince you the vaccines were safe and effective? "Trust the science!"
Would there be a concerted effort by clandestine groups to convince the public that chemtrails are imaginary if it could be considered a crime against humanity and they were trying to avoid accountability? I would say yes.
We live with fact checkers like Snopes who have been shown to be bias, always pushing public attention away from the truth. Do you not think there are a group of upper level, government paid fact checkers with scientific backgrounds who could make a convincing argument that the white lines are normal contrails?
I am old enough to remember the times when white streaks across the sky did not exist. I have been following chemtrail theories since they started. Read many water sample reports analyzing the chemical compounds that are being found in remote pounds and lakes. Ya, the fact checkers always have an excuse as to why barium, strontium and aluminum is being found in concentrations that are hundreds of time normal levels and they are paid to make you question how it got there.
I think we have seen enough misdirection and lies in recent years from people who we were told to trust to come up with our own rational conclusions. If they are trying to poison us with a dozen different methods, why should we eliminate the air we breathe?
Tell me, in your mind in which decade did these white streaks across the sky started?
Can I just ask a couple questions as I’ve been confronted here on this hot topic a few times…
Why are you asking anons to prove without a shadow of a doubt that chemtrails are real?
This is a thread where an anon posted a video of Tucker Carlson. In fact this site is my only source of news, I wouldn’t have seen it elsewhere. I don’t follow people on YouTube or X etc.
Again, Tucker is posted here all the time, and it’s pretty obvious here he is being slick in his words and almost agreeing with what she says with questions.
For example the way he pauses her and says “wait so what are chemtrails?” In his questioning voice.
She says the whole “well that’s a little deep” and he chuckles “well hey most of these conspiracy’s turn out to be true!”
Then he completely throws away this act as he agrees with her. As she describes seeing the X and the clouds he says “YES!” not “huh? What?” Or “contrails you mean?”
Then the ultimate wink and nod that he knows exactly what she is talking about, and perhaps even knows to be true.
“I don’t think people look at the sky anymore…. I think people are looking at their iPhones so they don’t notice…” then laughs as he says people aren’t stargazing.
So reading in between the lines what is he implying? SHOULD people be looking at the sky? If so looking for WHAT? What does he think they are MISSING?
THEN he says how did you get into that? “Like NOTICING THINGS AROUND YOU AND WONDERING WHAT THEY ARE?”
So my questions are, should we be discussing if Tucker is a shill? Should we be discussing why Tucker shouldn’t entertain this or is wrong because we can’t prove it here? Should we NOT post Tucker who seems to be hitting all types of fringe conspiracy ideas as of late?
When the Govt was going UFO crazy I believe TUCKER made some VERY FRINGE and intriguing episodes that circulated here heavily.
I don’t remember ever seeing a mod post and then arguing over wether or not it could be PROVEN, wether or not alien tech could be proven.
So why can’t we post and discuss Tucker on weather mods but we can talk anything else Tucker, aliens, religion, I believe he even touched on some nephilim stuff with Barr etc…..
Where did I say this? Did you read my full post? Did you read the very first line? What did I say about making claims that I said what I did not say?