EDIT: Title should more correctly read "...in attempt to TEMPORARILY derail..." as pointed out by several excellent comments.
Added as supplement to recent discussions on REAL facts of WW2. Related posts:
Hitler in English: https://greatawakening.win/p/17tKnaUFom/buy-a-history-book-published-20-/
Commie-Nazi 2-layer destruction of Germany/US: https://greatawakening.win/p/17tKncjOpY/the-doublelayer-commienazi-us-de/
Real World Political Spectrum: https://greatawakening.win/p/17tKnclaca/the-real-world-political-spectru/c/
Hitler and non-cabal advisors literally blew up the globalist plans of Nationalist-Christian Germans vs Nationalist-Orthodox Russians with Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact [Aug 23, 1939, done in SECRET shortly before Sep war start]. Shortly after when it got out, globalists and Nazi sleeper cells inside German military and SS were apparently activated to undermine and redirect Hitler admin (think German Deep State continuous sabotage):
The pact was signed in Moscow on 23 August 1939 by German Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop and Soviet Foreign Minister Vyacheslav Molotov.[3]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact
History has been rewritten (by Khazarian mafia and agents) to hide the fact that there was a murderous, criminal faction of Nazi Party (SS and treasonous Generals) that undermined and sabotaged Hitler almost continuously in order to murder him (Valkyrie?) and “engineer” a conflict with Russia (Soviet Union). Sound familiar? (Looking at you Lindsey Graham and John Bolton).
Cabal appears to have popularized “molotov cocktail” intentionally to suppress this historical event name, imo. Ironically (or maybe not), the M-R Pact was literally a “molotov cocktail” thrown through the London Banker window, setting all their plans on fire, and they couldn’t allow that.
This was not the reason for the Pact. It was a tactical move on Hitler's part...that ended up backfiring.
For context: the Treaty of Versailles redrew Germany's borders amongst surrounding countries. That placed German civilians within countries they wanted nothing to do with. Poland, in particular, had already been infiltrated with bolsheviks. They were trying to instigate a larger conflict with Germany, and began terrorizing and murdering Germans within Poland. This began creating a humanitarian crisis, as well as angering Hitler. He warned Poland on several occasions to stop, but Poland ignored those demands.
Separately, and during this same time, Poland signed a protectionist agreement with England, such that England would come to their aid and also provide monies for rebuilding if there were a war. This proves intent on Poland's part.
Hitler was preparing to invade Poland to rescue German citizens, but the Red Army was also encroaching from the east. To avoid any suggestion that there might be aggression construed against Russia, the Pact was signed as a recognition on both sides that neither had designs on the other side. Hitler was only interested in sending a message to Poland, rescuing citizens, and withdrawing.
Excellent tie to Treaty of Versailles. Clearly ToV very specifically designed to create future conflict. Most major world events 1912-1948 appear to have been “engineered” by cabal for desired outcomes.
There are optical reasons and there are real reasons, for pretty much everything that happens. Nothing in history is one dimensional and very few major developments are organic as we are lead to believe.
This is the reason why we have narratives that does not make sense if looked at purely from optics.
I have come to believe that the best way to figure out the primary reason for some event is by looking at the final result. That is usually what the intention really was.
In the case of Molotov-Ribbontrop, the optical reasons can never explain why it backfired because if the only reason for the pact was for Hitler to tell the Soviets that he was not interested in anything beyond then there would have been no reason for the Nazi-Soviet conflict.
But if you look at Hitler's (and Stalin's) greatest achievement in light of what we know the real goals of WW2 (unification of Europe under a totalitarian - either Nazi or Commie - control) was that their actions - specifically the war between the two of them made this impossible.
I always say Hitler's greatest achievement was defeating the Nazis.
From this perspecive, a deal between Hitler and Stalin to get rid of the International Banker influences and their evil minions from each others' countries makes perfect sense.
Unification of Europe under totalitarian control was not a goal of Hitler's.
I didn't say Hitler's. I said "what we know the real goals of WW2" - the real goals of the Satanists who orchestrated WW1 was to get rid of monarchy, and WW2 was a unified Europe under either Nazis or Commies - whoever won out in the end.
Hitler played this game, definitely knowing he was a pawn, but also trying to outmanoeuvre his controllers, and in the end succeeded in setting back their plans, even though he failed getting rid of them (That would have been an impossible task regardless, at that time with his limited vantage)
Hitler had no controllers, nor was he a "puppet." History has firmly established this.
Would love to hear on what basis you claim this.
Many such examinations can be found on this:
http://www.renegadetribune.com/hitler-was-not-controlled-opposition-part-1/
http://www.renegadetribune.com/hitler-was-not-controlled-opposition-part-2/
http://www.renegadetribune.com/hitler-was-not-controlled-opposition-part-3/
http://www.renegadetribune.com/hitler-was-not-controlled-opposition-part-4/
http://www.renegadetribune.com/hitler-was-not-controlled-opposition-part-5/
http://www.renegadetribune.com/hitler-was-not-controlled-opposition-part-6/
Also: https://www.unz.com/article/was-hitler-controlled-opposition/
Resource with many links: http://www.renegadetribune.com/hitler-was-not-controlled-opposition-series-recap/
This short documentary, while discussing the falsehood that Hitler was a Rothschild/jew, is relevant because it exposes the jewish propaganda to attempt to destroy his image and popularity by associating him with a hated group. This is the same thing the cabal is trying to do by claiming he was a cabal puppet and doing their bidding -- to muddy his image and corrupt his intentions: https://www.bitchute.com/video/6Eyy71szPzrJ/
I could include more links, but this gives you enough. There are agents here on GAW (and other message boards) who spread false information about Hitler through memes, etc., so they are still actively at work. I have challenged some of them, and they are easy to spot because they immediately resort to name-calling, and obviously know nothing about history.
That appears to be part of the historical context and may be one of the reasons. I postulate there were multiple reasons, and likely bigger ones than that one. Obviously, A REASON was needed as justification, but implications of M-R were very big.
Churchill lost his shit and went all-out to undo it once he found out. London bankers nearly lost all their assets anyway (Battle of Britain softening of City of London for focused German invasion) after much of non-Swiss Rothschild wealth seized by Hitler in France, Belgium, and Austria. Churchill needed Germans and Soviets fighting to effectively save London bankers (without Americans). They absolutely COULD NOT have a NONAGRESSION PACT.
Their goal was to give the territory of Poland, which they did.
Once done - the 2 armies shook hands meeting half way and running military parade together:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German%E2%80%93Soviet_military_parade_in_Brest-Litovsk
It was an aggression pact (a conspiracy) under the disguise of anti-aggression pact.
I think it was both. It appeared to be both strategic and tactical.
No. I don’t think this theory makes any sense.
The “mafia” people as you’re referring to them were holding most of the senior positions in the soviet government and secret police that have been killing Polish soldiers, police, priests, teachers and administration workers during and after the war.
It doesn’t make sense that “mafia” people have partnered with Germans to kill … “mafia”.
The pact was all about the Polish land, resources and slaves they both wanted.
Expert “history” tells us that “it was all about Poland”, meaning that this is likely only part of the story, is my argument here. More to the story that cabal does not want revealed. New York Times and Time Magazine both sudden and dramatic switch from celebrating both Stalin and Hitler to making them Evil Dictators is BIG flag that at some point they went “off the reservation” and became “enemies of the bankers”.
I'm wondering if Hitler found out who is actually responsible for creating the Communist Party and what religion Stalin actually was and what secret society he belonged to, and those are the real reasons why Hitler flipped on the USSR and invaded I stead of remaining "allies."
He flipped after the commies had trouble taking Finland.
Whole conflict with Soviets does not make sense at all and was blamed on “incompetence” and “mistakes” just like Napolean’s “mistake” a hundred years prior. I suspect manipulation, deception, treason, or a combination of all 3.
Note that Hitler and Stalin appeared to “coordinate” a 1,2 punch directly through Ukraine (even when “at war”), depopulating key parts of it both on the way in AND on the way out. Coincidence that two anti-banker, anti-globalist, nationalist leaders sequentially steamrolled the historical Khazarian homeland (western half) of those very same globalist bankers?
I have only read the book Pawns in the Game partially, but the WW2 chapter talks in detail about how Hitler had amazing plans to get rid of the International Bankers from the entire world and he did so by trying to create an alliance with Britain.
Who was in that meeting? Why the very same Ribbentrop in addition to Georing and Hitler! The whole meeting was about an alliance, even just a "No war between Britain and Germany for 10 years" while Hitler would exterminate the International Bankers everywhere including US. He was absolutely convinced that this was the only way to free the world.
He was probably right as we appear to be seeing right now that only a worldwide military alliance between US-Russia-China and others has allowed the rollback of the bankers achieved so far.
Hitler likely fell into a trap or was betrayed, but even so nearly pulled off a brute force removal of London bankers which would have been World Changing. I suspect he got blindsided by the cabal bankers hiding in Switzerland and Sweden conspiring against him.
Not really. There was also the entire US to contend with. The bankers are well distributed for this very reason. He was never even close to success, not even with just London bankers, unless he bombed he hell out of London and reduced the whole England into rubble, and he definitely did not want to do that. And even if he did that, the US was still at large.
More like he simply did not expect the full extent of the problem to be so enormous.
Secondly, his solution was just exterminating the vermin which we have seen is futile if people are not awake.
We cannot hold either against him, because the enemy is sophisticated and he was still a pioneer in this problem.
The point though, is that Hitler would never have been successful no matter how hard he tried, because he simply did not have the full map. What he achieved - ensuring Nazis did not win. AND communism did not spread - was the best possible outcome given the circumstances.
Q plan built on the lessons learnt from all these attempts and it took decades of prep work (BRICS started early 2000 for eg) AND 8 long years of actual Operation to get to this point.
We truely have no idea how iconic this moment in humanity is, and we all exit right here, right now.
Well said. Agreed on lessons learned, and clearly Hitler was on a rug that could be pulled out from under him at any time in at least 2 ways.
Hitler appears to have been targeting bankers directly. Accounts of ‘Battle of Britain’ in old encyclopedias keep talking about “Central London” being bombed by Germans (i.e. separate City of London Corp banker HQ). And it appears the Germans went after Swedish central bankers directly as well. But you are right, too many hidden nodes to defeat them all.
Germany had been providing machinery and military know how to the Russians secretly through the previous few years (late 1930s) in exchange for space to train their Army and Luftwaffe away from the western powers as well as oil from.
The Pact codified the cooperation and targeted Poland to carve up. After the Polish campaign, Stalin kept pressuring Germany for.more and more territory. Hitler (likely rightly) believed that Stalin was gearing up for war in the next few years. He knew he had no chance against a fully prepared and supplied Soviet Army- so he decided to strike with all possible haste when Germany appeared to have the upper hand.
While Germany was preparing to launch Operation Barbarossa (invasion of Russia), Soviet agents in the Roosevelt government (Harry Dexter White and Harry Hopkins among others) were working to goad Japan unto attacking the USA, eliminating the need for the many Far East divisions in USSR securing Siberian border againat Japanese invasion. These divisions were needed sice Japan embarassed the Russians in the Russo-Japaneae war in 1904-1905. They succeeded in doing this, and theae Siberian and f Far East divisions ended up arriving just in time to defend Moscow from the Germans.
The name "Molotov Cocktail" actually originates from the Spanish Civil war-a very misunderstood and interesting conflict in its own rigbt.
I can understand arguments regarding factional stryfe in the 3rd Reich. I think there were some very nasty actors in that regime, but also se honorable military men.
It would take a hell of a lot though, to convince me that ANY portion of the Soviet hierarchy under Stalin were white hats. That was a genocidal, murderous regime of thugs.
Stalin was Nationalist thug, apparently. There appeared to be a Soviet Deep State of foreign agents controlled by British intelligence that Stalin kept purging along with anyone else accidently rolled up in them. (Brute force with little discrimination).
Soviet Deep State kept reconstituting itself after Stalin purges, and MI-6 hit their target date of Stalin removal via poisoning just prior to QE2 coronation in 1953.
Curious regarding your sources of this info. Not arguing or denying, would like to read it myself.
I think Stalin was a self-interested thug. Whatever it took to keep himself in power, and grow the country he ruled, thus increasing his power.
I would be very interested to understand everything MI-6 has been involved in over the years- that is a very shady and nefarious group of characters.
The Soviets had a very good intel network in the west (and likely still do) in the '30s, '40s and '50s. Think Kim Philby. One would think they would find any deep cover agents in their own government because of this.
The US integrated Reinhard Gehlen's (Originally Nazi) intel org into the CIA after WW2 because fhey didnt have any assets in Russia. Interesting that MI-6 could, with vastly fewer resources (albeit more experience).
Compiling and putting pieces together still.
Listening to ‘Breaking History’ (Wed) on Badlands Media on Rumble. They list many of their sources, well-vetted. They have great research on 1. Origins of CIA/KGB, 2. Probable murder of Stalin as payback for purges (possibly Operation Gladio within SU related?), 3. Hitler attacking-removing the central bankers, and 4. Interesting operations by both Hitler and Stalin in Ukraine and Eastern Europe during WW2.
Older printed encyclopedias like 1949? Ency Americana also have extensive details on WW2 European activities that have since all been deleted from history and the internet.