Because the judge convinced the Jury (so to speak) that eveb though the accountant did it, Trump must have known it.
Here is the metaphor he used:
The jury had asked to hear again what they described in a note as the judge's "rain metaphor" instruction.
It advises jurors that they can infer that it's raining — by seeing someone's wet umbrella, for example — even if they don't see the rain themselves.
I kid you not, this judge peed on our umbrella and told us its raining.
Man, I thought RussiaGate was blatant, 2020 was blatant, Plandemic was blatant, Vaccines were blatant, but, nothing is more blatant than this "conviction"
Not to sound like a fag or anything, but the problem is not that Trump paid hush money; but isn't it that he supposedly used campaign money to do so? It's dumb because his campaign money was his own money since he funded his own campaign, making it a moot point and it shows how dumb the whole thing is.
I will just leave this here.
Sadly, Trump was not convicted of hush money. He was convicted of his accountant making wrong entry.
It was the same thing.
They changed the game.
Why didn't they prosecute the accountant? Does a business owner have professional liability for their accountant?
Because the judge convinced the Jury (so to speak) that eveb though the accountant did it, Trump must have known it.
Here is the metaphor he used:
I kid you not, this judge peed on our umbrella and told us its raining.
Man, I thought RussiaGate was blatant, 2020 was blatant, Plandemic was blatant, Vaccines were blatant, but, nothing is more blatant than this "conviction"
Not to sound like a fag or anything, but the problem is not that Trump paid hush money; but isn't it that he supposedly used campaign money to do so? It's dumb because his campaign money was his own money since he funded his own campaign, making it a moot point and it shows how dumb the whole thing is.
They just worded it they way the wanted for Trump and Clinton.
Was it her dress or his?
https://www.timesofisrael.com/painting-of-clinton-in-blue-dress-hung-in-jeffrey-epsteins-home/
The woman in the picture is Paula Jones. The blue dress was from the Monica Lewinski affair.
Very true. I’ve been drinking. But, I have been thinking about that painting with him in the blue dress lately, thus my quick response.
His.
$800K in the 1990s is prolly close to $3M+ today.
Thanks to the Mod that flared this.