https://newatlas.com/medical/tattoos-lymphoma-risk/
Bonus link: 83% of tattoo inks contain hidden ingredients linked to cancer, organ damage: study
From the NewAtlas article at top:
Getting a tattoo, regardless of its size, increases the risk of developing lymphoma by 21%, according to a new study.
. . . Tattoos are much more common than they were a couple of decades ago. According to the Pew Research Center, 32% of US adults have one, and 22% have more than one. Now considered to be more socially acceptable, everyone – from pop stars to politicians – seems to be sporting ink.
. . . The lymphatic system is part of the immune system. It keeps body fluid levels in balance and defends against infection. There are two main types of cancer affecting the lymphatic system: non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), which accounts for around 90% of all lymphomas, and Hodgkin lymphoma. There are about 40 subtypes of NHL, which differ in how fast they grow and spread. NHL is one of the most common cancers in the US and can occur at any age.
. . . Previous studies have found particles of tattoo ink – and, indeed, metal nanoparticles from the tattoo needle itself – can travel to the lymph nodes.
“We already know that when the tattoo ink is injected into the skin, the body interprets this as something foreign that should not be there and the immune system is activated,” Nielsen said. “A large part of the ink is transported away from the skin to the lymph nodes, where it is deposited.”
how many of them were vaxxed?
I think in statistics, that is called a "confounding factor." Variables that are difficult to account for in the data. What might be interesting is to look at lymphoma data and tattoos BEFORE 2020 to see if there is a similar correlation.
Good question. Tattoos seem a lot more prevalent among lefties, and I suspect have been pushed by the Cabal along with so many other things that were formerly seen as suspect or not acceptable. Lefties are -- I think, but don't have data for -- more likely to be COVID-jabbed.
In any case, I suspect the jabs make any tattooed person more likely to get cancer, if only because of the immune system degradation they are known to cause.
idk if you've been around US military lately but I know a lot of tattooed guys who are definitely not libs.
in Sweden though lol they are all libs
Yeah, we tend to sleeve up alot.
Not a lefty, 50% tattooed. Got my first tattoo at 48. No jab no cancer
And ex-military tough guys
When I was in the service, having a tattoo was more common than barfing your guts out after chow
Ah. Good point; military (esp. Navy?) guys are the original tattoo enthusiasts, predating the modern popularity of body art.
We will never know, BUT ...
This story is not likely a cabal cover story to hide the vaxx injuries.
If it is true that ink causes lymphoma, then that will have the OPPOSITE effect that [they] want.
This would reduce the number of people who get tattoos. [They] don't want that.
[They] WANT people to engage in the ritual of self-mutilation.
But at the expense of the public trust in big pharma, a multi trillion dollar money maker/eugenics program and has been for decades? Yeah you can get tatts and long term cancer, but which one is guaranteed to destroy literal generations down to a genetics level and not affect only 1/3 of the population, but more than 1/2 most likely.... Not saying tatts are always appropriate or even good for you body health overall, but I know quite a few people with them, in and out of my family of all ages, and the only ones to get cancer were the ones who worked at a big name tire factory. While the self mutilation is a good reason for them to continue it, which one would achieve your end goal quicker if you were an evil organization of satanic ped0 super villains? That's the kind of thing I ask myself sometimes to keep me from being extra paranoid more than usual kek
I'm just saying [they] would come up with a DIFFERENT cover story for the vaxx damage.
[They] would not want to discourage tattoos.
[They] want ALL forms of harm promoted.
I don't know, but I do think being jabbed would increase the likelihood of tats causing cancer, because the jabs seem to make EVERY bad thing that can happen to people (including car accidents, as "vaxidents" show) more likely. There's an near-endless list of studies and scientific commentary now describing WHY the jabs are so dangerous.