Why are they preventing him from entering a public building? I find it very interesting that all of these government buildings has implemented these very private security protocols over the years. They are public places, owned my the public. And this comes from me. A lifelong government employee. It’s because we fear from rrtiation. I can see this both ways. People are fed up with their government. But government is also there to ensure an orderly society. I fear we are beginning to cross the line.
That building isn't Federal property. It is all privately owned, just like the 12 other FedRes buildings in the U.S.. 1912 saw the loss of 3 hard core opponents of a centralized banking system with the Titanic and within 20 months time down at Jeckyl Island, GA evil minions were laboring new legislation and directives which saw 1913 as a very dark year for our country. Jeckyl clowns gave us the 16th Amendment (IRS) forced upon us and next to the current screwball at 1600 Penn Ave, the WORST POTUS (Woodrow Wilson) quietly enacted their jeweled crown the Federal Reserve Act of December 1913 while Congress was in Xmas recess. It has been argued that the 16th Amendment wasn't fully ratified by the existing states 2/3s rule then as required by Constitutional law. The evil empire of economic debt slavery has been crushing the world since then.
But! It is also exhilarating to see young people like this young man start noting and exposing the truth. We need more like him o do the right thing!! God's speed to them! NCSWIC. The DS knows it and they are panicked!
A top-down central Federal Government will always be anathema to the rights and liberties of a free people! We don't need a central Federal Government...what we need is Local and State Governments that are in agreement as a loose Confederation of States for the common defense (Militia) and a Navy. That's it!
What's difficult for people to grasp...especially when you were raised being told we were a free nation, a Republic, etc...is that what we are told and what the Constitution says it does are most often than not two different things...unfortunately. This is why Patrick Henry said it was "Masked Aristocracy." He believed correctly that our Constitution would create a ruling class underhandedly by design by slowly, because of it's very loose language, undermine the authority of the States and the people. Over time it would lead to all power being handed over or given into the hands of a few. As our Constitutional history demonstrates, there were not proper safeguards against the States and or We the People unwittingly handing over our sovereignty to those legislators who would be bought and paid for by lobbyists. There was no Constitutional oversight for the most obvious (of course hind-sight is always clearest) of dangers...such as how to deal with those who would negate their oath of office for example. If there had been oversight in even that one area built into the language of the Constitution, it would have been a much more reasonable document.
As we read the Supremacy Clause together, I am sure you will see (now that you are aware of the danger many of our Founding Fathers saw back during the ratification process) how, as a natural progression, the Constitution was designed to "Centralize" power in Washington D.C. Let's read it together..."This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the Supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding." This Supremacy Clause alone is very draconian in nature and does the one thing that Alexander Hamilton said it would not...create a Central Federal Power that would strip the States of all power. Now, we still hear all the time via media pundits like Sean Hannity or that other mind bending "Constitutional Scholar" Mark Levin...that States Rights always trump the FED. I cannot tell you how many times I have heard this...but the reality is much different I'm afraid. In reality, if a state like, say Texas, decides it wants to enforce "Its" laws for border control, all DC does is threaten to send in the military to stop them...and they would be 100% Constitutional in doing so apparently!
The bottom line is that if the Constitution were really designed to safeguard the Liberty of We the People, it would have. But from the very beginning, it did not! Read up on the Whiskey Rebellion of 1791 as a perfect example of how...right out of the shoot...the newly founded government was being used as a hammer to beat down the Liberty of We the People and trample States Rights.
Why are they preventing him from entering a public building? I find it very interesting that all of these government buildings has implemented these very private security protocols over the years. They are public places, owned my the public. And this comes from me. A lifelong government employee. It’s because we fear from rrtiation. I can see this both ways. People are fed up with their government. But government is also there to ensure an orderly society. I fear we are beginning to cross the line.
The FED is a private building, but point taken.
That building isn't Federal property. It is all privately owned, just like the 12 other FedRes buildings in the U.S.. 1912 saw the loss of 3 hard core opponents of a centralized banking system with the Titanic and within 20 months time down at Jeckyl Island, GA evil minions were laboring new legislation and directives which saw 1913 as a very dark year for our country. Jeckyl clowns gave us the 16th Amendment (IRS) forced upon us and next to the current screwball at 1600 Penn Ave, the WORST POTUS (Woodrow Wilson) quietly enacted their jeweled crown the Federal Reserve Act of December 1913 while Congress was in Xmas recess. It has been argued that the 16th Amendment wasn't fully ratified by the existing states 2/3s rule then as required by Constitutional law. The evil empire of economic debt slavery has been crushing the world since then.
But! It is also exhilarating to see young people like this young man start noting and exposing the truth. We need more like him o do the right thing!! God's speed to them! NCSWIC. The DS knows it and they are panicked!
Public? No...
A top-down central Federal Government will always be anathema to the rights and liberties of a free people! We don't need a central Federal Government...what we need is Local and State Governments that are in agreement as a loose Confederation of States for the common defense (Militia) and a Navy. That's it!
Kinda wish the States had never created the Federal Govt, but doesn't the Constitution provide for it?
What's difficult for people to grasp...especially when you were raised being told we were a free nation, a Republic, etc...is that what we are told and what the Constitution says it does are most often than not two different things...unfortunately. This is why Patrick Henry said it was "Masked Aristocracy." He believed correctly that our Constitution would create a ruling class underhandedly by design by slowly, because of it's very loose language, undermine the authority of the States and the people. Over time it would lead to all power being handed over or given into the hands of a few. As our Constitutional history demonstrates, there were not proper safeguards against the States and or We the People unwittingly handing over our sovereignty to those legislators who would be bought and paid for by lobbyists. There was no Constitutional oversight for the most obvious (of course hind-sight is always clearest) of dangers...such as how to deal with those who would negate their oath of office for example. If there had been oversight in even that one area built into the language of the Constitution, it would have been a much more reasonable document.
As we read the Supremacy Clause together, I am sure you will see (now that you are aware of the danger many of our Founding Fathers saw back during the ratification process) how, as a natural progression, the Constitution was designed to "Centralize" power in Washington D.C. Let's read it together..."This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the Supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding." This Supremacy Clause alone is very draconian in nature and does the one thing that Alexander Hamilton said it would not...create a Central Federal Power that would strip the States of all power. Now, we still hear all the time via media pundits like Sean Hannity or that other mind bending "Constitutional Scholar" Mark Levin...that States Rights always trump the FED. I cannot tell you how many times I have heard this...but the reality is much different I'm afraid. In reality, if a state like, say Texas, decides it wants to enforce "Its" laws for border control, all DC does is threaten to send in the military to stop them...and they would be 100% Constitutional in doing so apparently!
The bottom line is that if the Constitution were really designed to safeguard the Liberty of We the People, it would have. But from the very beginning, it did not! Read up on the Whiskey Rebellion of 1791 as a perfect example of how...right out of the shoot...the newly founded government was being used as a hammer to beat down the Liberty of We the People and trample States Rights.
Fortunately the Founders had the foresight to make it amendable
The Fed if not a government building. That is the point of the video. It is operated privately.