The Bible Said It All
Link Below š
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (80)
sorted by:
How so?
Not exactly out of context. Its part of the curses God put on the people if they disobey His commandments. One could say we have been disoveying for a long time and hence it has come to pass.
https://biblehub.com/nkjv/deuteronomy/28.htm
The verse in isolation paints foreigners as bad. Or makes it seem that way. But this is inconsistent with other biblical texts and the bible should not contain internal contradiction so it must mean something else. Let's take a look:
Deuteronomy 28 contains several passages that mention foreigners in the context of blessings and curses. When the Israelites obey Godās commandments, they are promised dominance and prosperity, including being lenders to many nations but borrowing from none. Conversely, disobedience leads to foreign nations gaining power over them, oppressing them, and taking their resources.
This depiction arises from the context of ancient Israel, where national strength and independence were viewed as signs of divine favor, and foreign domination was seen as a sign of divine displeasure.
The references to foreigners are part of the broader theme of blessings and curses related to the covenant, rather than an inherent judgment on foreigners themselves.
-keep in mind, us gentiles are foreigners in this context.
I don't think modern jews are either. The tribes were lost. They don't even dare call themselves Israelites.
Khazarian counterfeits.
I agree.
Nothing in that passage was a judgement about foreigners, just the result of what would happen from the foreigners if you disobey the Commandments, unless you chose to read it that way.
Correct
Correct, that's actually my point. The passage in isolation makes it appear that way.
Deuteronomy 28:1-14 = Blessings for Obedience
Deuteronomy 28:15-68 = Curses for Disobedience
The commentary on this section is helpful as well:
When Blessing Turns into Curse
The verses that follow form a great contrast with the previous verses. It is a dramatic section full of warnings. These are prophecies that have literally been fulfilled.
The interpretation of Scripture is threefold: literally in history, prophetically in the future and the spiritual or practical application for us. It is a serious section not only for Israel, but also for us. This section is also written that we may learn from it. In Romans 11 we hear the same warning and prophecy for Christianity (Rom 11:16-24 ). Christianity has experienced the same. The question is: What do we do with the lesson that this section contains?
In Deu 28:16-19 , everything in which the people in Deu 28:3-6 will be blessed by obedience is turned into a curse by disobedience. The curse runs parallel with the blessing. The curse hits them in the blessing. This is a penetrating presentation of the matter. From a spiritual point of view, we see that unfaithfulness causes the blessings to disappear ā the insight in them and the enjoyment of them ā and instead evil teachings come in, destroying the life of faith in every way.
This is a misunderstanding that millions of Christians have, due to false translations of the Bible.
The word "gentile" comes from the Hebrew word "goy" or "goyim" if plural. It means "nation." That is exactly what it means.
God told Abraham, "I will make nations of thee." In Hebrew, it said, "I will make goyim of thee."
Rebekah was pregnant with Esau and Jacob, and she was having problems because they were fighting inside her. God told her, "Two nations are in thy womb." In the original Hebrew, it says, "Two goyim are in they womb."
These translations into English are correct (goy/goyim to nation(s)) because that is the only way the translators could make it make sense. But elsewhere, the translators falsified what the original scripture said, translating it into "gentile."
In the New Testament, where the English word is "gentile," the translators translated from the Greek word "ethnos," which also means "nation(s)."
So, goy and ethnos both mean nations in English, but the translators sometimes translated correctly and other times incorrectly.
The Bible was translated into Latin before it was translated into English and other languages. In Latin, the word "gentilis" was used, when goy and ethnos appeard, at least in many places.
"Gentilis" means "of a clan or race." When the English translations came about, they used the made-up word, "gentile" where goy/ethnos/gentilis was in the other languages.
The modern English Bibles use "gentile" to mean "non-jew," but neither "gentile" nor "jew" was ever in the original scriptures.
Goy and ethnos means a nation, which comes from "nacio," which is a people related by family heritage (i.e. a race of people, or a family within that race).
The true Israelites of the Bible are the Keltic, Germanic, Anglo-Saxon, and Scandinavian Caucasians of the world. This is a nation of people, because "nation" means race, or a family within a race. In Hebrew, the word "arab" means "mixed." The Hebrews understood that the arabs were a mixed race.
The Israelite nation is different from other nations of the world -- both now, and in the Bible. Each nation is different from the others, though many are of mixed races. The jews are a different race from the Israelites, and are a mixed race, partly of Shem, but also partly of Ham, and of Cain: Semite, Canaanite, and Kenite. (Note: The jews are not true Semites because they are not pure. They are Edomites (which are of Esau, who was a Semite). Esau/Edom mixed with Canaanites and Hittites (Canaanites who had also mixed with Kenites and others). The end result of Esau/Edom's race mixing was the Edomites, who are today's jews. The Jewish Encyclopedia admits not only this, but also admits that the jews are not Israelites. They just don't tell anyone else. These are secrets within Jewry.
These jews, as well as others, are the people that Deuteronomy 28 was referring to when "foreigner" was used. They are foreign to the Israelite people (the White race). The jews have perverted the Bible by infiltrating Christianity (which they do not believe in, and their Talmud teaches to hate), and they have warped the real meaning of the Bible, which is why the modern English versions are so confusing to so many Christians.
Note: When the Roman Empire switched to Christianity, they wanted the Old Testament and New Testament translated into Latin. Jews offered their services, claiming they were experts in Hebrew. This is how they infiltrated Christianity, so as to destroy it from within. They had 1,000+ years to continue massaging it to suit their Talmudic purposes, as it was a crime to write the Bible in any language other than Latin. Most people of the time could not read Latin. The European people spoke Greek, not Latin. Latin was reserved to the noble class and the clergy (and their jewish "helpers").
Nobody can understand a pure English version of the Bible today. It must be understood in the context of the original words used in the original scriptures in their original languages.
Thus, the statement, "us gentiles" is a false statement if by "us" you are referring to the White race (I don't know if you are, but I read it that way).
Therefore, the White race are not the "foreigners" mentioned in Deuteronomy 28. Rather, the White race are the Israelites that, if we do not follow God's law, will have all those problems mentioned, and the "foreigners" are today's jews who are the "adversary" to the White race -- and always have been. They are the ones today who are primarily behind all the degeneracy, the foreign invasion of ONLY White countries, the banking system that has bankrupted a once White nation, etc.
The reason for the apparent contradictions is that the original meanings have been forgotten and distorted. Remember, the Bible says that the Israelite people would forget who they were. The jews claim to be those people, which means if they really were, then they never forgot. And that means that it cannot be them. But the White people today have no clue they are the true Israelites of the Bible. So, it fits.
Furthermore, if "foreigners are bad," then it is God saying it, so go argue with God.
But it does not actually say the foreigners are bad. That is your interpretation. It just says what the foreigners will do if the Israelites do not follow God's law. There is no judgement on the foreigners themselves. You are just reading that into it.
Sounds EXACTLY like the history of the White race, up to and including what is going on today in ONLY WHITE COUNTRIES. None of these problems are happening in Africa, Asia, or South America.
These problems are in North America, Europe, and Australia -- only in White countries.
I agree that it is not a judgement on the foreigners themselves. It is a judgement on the Israelites, that if they turn away from God and God's law, then the foreigners will do these things.
The story of the Bible, especially the covenant, is ONLY about the Israelite people. They are the protagonists of the story. Everyone else is a side note. The jews are the "Adversary" to the Israelites, and are therefore the antagonists. But the jews are a mixed race, and so there are various groups of people in the Bible that played a role in causing problems for the Israelites. Of course, the Israelites themselves also caused their own problems, by not following God's law.
Adam was the first White man (not the first man). His descendants were the "Adamites." The word "adam" means to be ruddy, or the ability to become red in the face, which can only describe the White race.
God gave them some rules, but most of them disobeyed. So, God wiped out most of them with a flood, which was local (not worldwide). This is why there is no record of a flood during that time in China, for example.
Noah was selected to survive and start over for the specific reason he was "pure in his ancestry." He was a great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandson of Adam, through Seth (see: Genesis 5).
His son, Shem (aka Sem) became the patriarch of the "Semites." His great-grandson, Eber, became the patriarch of the "Hebrews" (see: Genesis 11).
Abram was a great-great-great-great-grandson of Eber (see also Genesis 11).
Abram was renamed Abraham, and then we had Isaac, Jacob/Israel, and the 12 sons of Israel, who became the patriarchs of nation of Israel. These people were all White, and none of them were jews.
Once you understand that this is a genetic family tree, and not a spiritual thing, the story makes sense. Of course, there is a spiritual element because God breathed the Sprit into Adam, but the story of the Bible is about this particular family tree.
We see in the New Testament, that this family tree would eventually produce Jesus Christ. He was also the Tree of Life back in the Garden of Eden. There were two trees "in the midst," with the Tree of Life representing Good/God/Jesus, and the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil representing Evil/Satan/Serpent.
The "foreigners" are all the various nations that existed at the time, who were NOT the Israelite nation.
The same is true today. As the White nation continues to turn away from God, the foreigners continue to invade and destroy.
It is as simple (and yet, complex) as that.
These problems are a new development in those 'White' countries. However these problems have existed in Africa, Asia and South America in all of recorded history. What you are saying is the nations last to fall to apostate are the 'White' nations. I will take that as a point of pride considering it took people from Africa, Asia, and South America to be in control of these nations so this true invasion and destruction that you referred to, could commence.
The word "nations" has a changed meaning in the modern era.
Today, the word is used to describe what we would call a "country," or a geographic area controlled by a government (a "state" or "nation state").
But that is not what the meaning was in the Bible. In the Bible, "nation" or "goy" or "ethnos" meant a group of poeple who were of the same race, or a family within a particluar race. Thus, a mixed (i.e. "racially diverse") society was not a nation. It was a racial term.
All the European countries were originally White, as was the USA. While it is true that Indians and blacks also lived within the geographic area, they were not part of the governmental body. The People were the governmental body, and those were the White people.
The Whites did invade the other nations, such as Africa, Asia, and South America over many centuries. That is true. But those other nations benefited, on the whole, by the Whites coming to their lands.
When the White Europeans showed up in Africa in the 1500's, the black Africans had not even figured out how to make a wheel, or a written language, or a two-story structure. The modern progress we see today in Africa was due to the Whites bringing technology to them.
The same is true of other places in the world. So, Deuteronomy 28 clearly has nothing to do with those nations of people, since their invasion was not a destruction, but a net benefit (yes, both good and bad, but on the whole, good).
The White nation(s), on the other hand, have had nothing but destruction from the invasion of other nations.
I understand why non-Whites like to live in White societies. They benefit greatly by living in a society built on White values. But the Whites are harmed by "muh diversity." It has not been a net benefit to Whites, and this is what Deuteronomy 28 is all about.
Incredibly misguided racism on display here.
Here are a few citations to prove you are wrong:
[Smith's Bible Dictionary] Gentiles - (nations). All the people who were not Jews were so called by them, being aliens from the worship, rites and privileges of Israel. The word was used contemptuously by them. In the New Testament, it is used as equivalent to Greek. This use of the word seems to have arisen from the almost universal adaption of the Greek language.
[International Standard Bible Encyclopedia] Gentiles - jenĀ“tıĢlz (×Ö¼××, goĢy, plural ×Ö¼×××, goĢyim; ĪµĢĢĪøĪ½ĪæĻ, eĢthnos, āpeople,ā ānationā): Goy (or Goi) is rendered āGentilesā in the King James Version in some 30 passages, but much more frequently āheathen,ā and oftener still, ānation,ā which latter is the usual rendering in the Revised Version (British and American), but it is commonly used for a non-Israelitish people, and thus corresponds to the meaning of Gentiles.ā It occurs, however, in passages referring to the Israelites, as in Gen 12:2; Deu 32:28; Jos 3:17; Jos 4:1; Jos 10:13; 2Sa 7:23; Isa 1:4; Zep 2:9, but the word (×¢×, āaĢm) is the term commonly used for the people of God. In the New Testament ethnos is the word corresponding to goĢy in the Old Testament and is rendered āGentilesā by both VSS, while (Ī»Ī±ĪæĢĻ, laoĢs) is the word which corresponds to āaĢmĢ. The King James Version also renders ĪĢĢĪ»Ī»Ī·Ī½ĪµĻ, HeĢlleĢnes, āGentilesā in six passages (Jhn 7:35; Rom 2:9, Rom 2:10; Rom 3:9; 1Co 10:32; 1Co 12:13), but the Revised Version (British and American) renders āGreeks.ā
The Gentiles were far less sharply differentiated from the Israelites in Old Testament than in New Testament times. Under Old Testament regulations they were simply non-Israelites, not from the stock of Abraham, but they were not hated or despised for that reason, and were to be treated almost on a plane of equality, except certain tribes in Canaan with regard to whom there were special regulations of non-intercourse. The Gentile stranger enjoyed the hospitality of the Israelite who was commanded to love him (Deu 10:19), to sympathize with him, āFor ye know the heart of the stranger, seeing ye were strangers in the land of Egyptā (Exo 23:9 the King James Version). The Kenites were treated almost as brethren, especially the children of Rechab (Jdg 1:16; Jdg 5:24; Jer 35). Uriah the Hittite was a trusted warrior of David (2 Sam 11); Ittai the Gittite was captain of David's guard (2Sa 18:2); Araunah the Jebusite was a respected resident of Jerusalem. The Gentiles had the right of asylum in the cities of refuge, the same as the Israelites (Num 35:15). They might even possess Israelite slaves (Lev 25:47), and a Gentile servant must not be defrauded of his wage (Deu 24:15). They could inherit in Israel even as late as the exile (Ezk 47:22, Ezk 47:23). They were allowed to offer sacrifices in the temple at Jerusalem, as is distinctly affirmed by Josephus (BJ, II, xvii, 2-4; Ant, XI, viii, 5; XIII, viii, 2; XVI, ii, 1; XVIII, v, 3; CAp, II, 5), and it is implied in the Levitical law (Lev 22:25). Prayers and sacrifices were to be offered for Gentile rulers (Jer 29:7; Baruch 1:10, 11; Ezr 6:10; 1 Macc 7:33; Josephus, BJ, II, x, 4). Gifts might be received from them (2 Macc 5:16; Josephus, Ant, XIII, iii, 4; XVI, vi, 4; BJ, V, xiii, 6; CAp, II, 5). But as we approach the Christian era the attitude of the Jews toward the Gentiles changes, until we find, in New Testament times, the most extreme aversion, scorn and hatred. They were regarded as unclean, with whom it was unlawful to have any friendly intercourse. They were the enemies of God and His people, to whom the knowledge of God was denied unless they became proselytes, and even then they could not, as in ancient times, be admitted to full fellowship. Jews were forbidden to counsel them, and if they asked about Divine things they were to be cursed. All children born of mixed marriages were bastards. That is what caused the Jews to be so hated by Greeks and Romans, as we have abundant evidence in the writings of Cicero, Seneca and Tacitus. Something of this is reflected in the New Testament (Jhn 18:28; Act 10:28; Act 11:3).
If we inquire what the reason of this change was we shall find it in the conditions of the exiled Jews, who suffered the bitterest treatment at the hands of their Gentile captors and who, after their return and establishment in Judea, were in constant conflict with neighboring tribes and especially with the Greek rulers of Syria. The fierce persecution of Antiochus IV, who attempted to blot out their religion and Hellenize the Jews, and the desperate struggle for independence, created in them a burning patriotism and zeal for their faith which culminated in the rigid exclusiveness we see in later times.
Don't forget it is the Kenyan born who is still controlling the white house, on his third term.
Do not forget it is the Jews who own and run America.
Keep in mind those other 'White' nations have non-white leaders who hold no allegiance to them, and often aren't even native to the land they are running into the ground.
Just more examples of foreigners causing problems, due to Whites not following The Law.
By us I mean non-isrealites, not whites.
In fact in Jesus time, Israelites had blond hair and blue eyes. I can give you the evidence if you need it.
Whites today are the Israelites of the Bible.
Jesus had blond hair and blue eyes. Historical letters to the Roman emperor (complaining about Jesus) state this.
He was an Israelite.
Jews are non-Israelites. But they have done a good job of lying about who they really are (Edomites -- which they admit to in the Jewish Encyclopedia).
You didn't convince me.
Thats vague. I didn't convince you of what?
Gentiles werenāt known for lending money, now were they?
The below poster MAGA768720 says it so much better than I.
There is nothing restricting them from doing so. The only restriction is on the Israelites, restricting them from adding interest when dealing with each other.
Thatās not what I said. Focusing on what could be, versus what is, shows my point.