When OHSA unilaterally mandated that tens of millions of private sector workers take the COVID shot or wear masks, appellate courts cited the Chevron doctrine for allowing it
The IRS has a slew of administrative law judges that assume a taxpayer's guilt without attempting to prove it; the patent office has been robbing small inventors wholesale with administrative rulings that invalidate their patents; the DEA and homeland security likewise strongarm people into settlements just like the IRS, getting millions just by threatening them with administrative lawfare "justice" that would never get through a court. And the gov't likewise sends out administrative subpoenas that look legal but agent, to go on information fishing expeditions instead of having to justify it before an actual judge.
It’s always funny when even Jon is talking about things, right after talking about kayfabe, saying he doesn’t understand why someone might be doing something, and doesn’t seem to understand that he might be talking about more kayfabe.
I guess even that could be kayfabe, but more likely it’s just harder to step outside the paradigm in the moment than it is in hindsight.
I’d like to see a good logic state map drawn out of how to analyze things against appearances.
Essentially any part of the Federal Executive Branch that used to be known as the "Three Letter Agencies" (DOE, EPA, FDA, IRS, etc.) but now also have more than three (BATFE, OSHA, etc.) are all going to get a tremendous amount of their power deleted.
When OHSA unilaterally mandated that tens of millions of private sector workers take the COVID shot or wear masks, appellate courts cited the Chevron doctrine for allowing it
Lots of people do, lots more will.
The IRS has a slew of administrative law judges that assume a taxpayer's guilt without attempting to prove it; the patent office has been robbing small inventors wholesale with administrative rulings that invalidate their patents; the DEA and homeland security likewise strongarm people into settlements just like the IRS, getting millions just by threatening them with administrative lawfare "justice" that would never get through a court. And the gov't likewise sends out administrative subpoenas that look legal but agent, to go on information fishing expeditions instead of having to justify it before an actual judge.
This is monumental.
Yes it is! I'm still trying to extrapolate all the implications! Absolutely MASSIVE!!!
u/#spicy
It's Devolution.
This will take the fangs and the claws out of the Alphabet Bois to the point where the Federal Gummint could shrink quite significantly.
It’s always funny when even Jon is talking about things, right after talking about kayfabe, saying he doesn’t understand why someone might be doing something, and doesn’t seem to understand that he might be talking about more kayfabe.
I guess even that could be kayfabe, but more likely it’s just harder to step outside the paradigm in the moment than it is in hindsight.
I’d like to see a good logic state map drawn out of how to analyze things against appearances.
I know. That's why I was searching for what different sectors have to say about this. It looks like this Chevron Defense was used in so many areas.
Essentially any part of the Federal Executive Branch that used to be known as the "Three Letter Agencies" (DOE, EPA, FDA, IRS, etc.) but now also have more than three (BATFE, OSHA, etc.) are all going to get a tremendous amount of their power deleted.
It's a "360 Win" as AJ likes to say.
Yes, more people will. We have been screwed over so much in so many sectors. This was a win!
So admiralty law of the seas?
I would love to hear Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch take on this. He actually still does Common Law juries.
Why call it “monumental” when we could call it … “Titanic”?
Hey who misplaced all the lifeboats?