It means that administrative judges are toast. Those judges aren't judges are all, but are gov't-agency bureaucrats used to: issue administrative subpoenas that get compliance by intimidation instead of by authority; trap people into a bureaucrat-run arbitration biased towards their policy instead of the agency proving their case before a court; and generally circumvent the judicial system entirely.
does this mean all unconstitutionally implemented regulations from when CD was first established are null and void?
Looks that way, but you might have to re-argue each regulation - not sure.
It means that administrative judges are toast. Those judges aren't judges are all, but are gov't-agency bureaucrats used to: issue administrative subpoenas that get compliance by intimidation instead of by authority; trap people into a bureaucrat-run arbitration biased towards their policy instead of the agency proving their case before a court; and generally circumvent the judicial system entirely.
Edit: also see some of the comments here- https://greatawakening.win/p/17tLKMr4k8/people-dont-understand-how-impor/ highlighting what else it did.
Hannity said that any regulation already in place remains, it only affects cases going forward.
if regulations put in place were unconstitutional it should all be torn down. how can they let any of it stand?
There’s going to be a lot of new court cases coming in the near future.
Every single regulation backed by chevron that tries to be enforced just needs a lawsuit immediately filed.
There has to be some lawyers willing, but maybe not seeing how they’ll destroy anyone willing to help trump see a fair trial