Him and "the older millennial" go back and forth on tiktok. It's entertaining. Harry made a video about this that he was "threatened" by Trump campaign for tweeting to him to expect a visit... kek that would be SS and/or FBI coming, not campaign employees
I suspect that this Harry Botter honed his magic craft spending a lot of time on Dumblejoe's lap growing up. After all, Pelosi gushed that her grandkids' favourite magic words are "Open Biden" 🤮🤮
People need to stop signal boosting this soyboy cunt. He's saying outrageous things to get attention. The more you share his crap, the bigger his social media presence gets. Ignore him and he will go away. I'm just going to start blocking people who can't stop sharing his posts and talking about him. Stop letting him live in your head rent free.
This guy gets entirely way too much attention and I'm confused why his name is being mentioned at all here. Dunking on a retarded teenager is a waste of time.
It seems on this topic that too many fall prey to vague and emotive theoreticals.
The theoreticals described are vague because it lets your mind wander and fill in the blanks however one is inclined. In this instance, we have presumed that Biden would be behaving corruptly or capriciously. But under a narrow set of circumstances defined by law, Biden as POTUS would indeed be authorized to "take out Trump", or anyone else that they were legally authorized to.
So maybe it'd help to create a theoretical where most folks would find this sort of action justified.
Post 9/11, Congress passed the AUMF, which grants the President the authority to use military force against those responsible for the September 11, 2001 attacks.
Now, the constitutionally of this thing is debatable, but let's just say strong evidence has emerged that person X is partly responsible for 9/11, and even openly brags about it. They are hiding out in some remote country for several years that is refusing to extradite them. They are openly planning new attacks and coordinating new efforts against the US.
Under the powers granted to the executive by the legislature, is POTUS authorized to "take out" said individual?
What POTUS is not permitted to do, and has never been permitted to do, and was not even discussed by the court, is to unilaterally order executions for no reason. This would be what is known as an unconstitutional order, which you can assume most civil officers would not follow, and would promptly be followed by an impeachment of said executive.
Those are the mechanisms we have for blocking a rogue executive and if you go much further than that, you don't have an executive at all (which the SC correctly acknowledged).
Every. Single. Time.
Him and "the older millennial" go back and forth on tiktok. It's entertaining. Harry made a video about this that he was "threatened" by Trump campaign for tweeting to him to expect a visit... kek that would be SS and/or FBI coming, not campaign employees
Monarch/MK Ultra recipient right there son. Clear as day.
No access to conscious mind...like an NPC with nobody home.
100%
What an absolute idiot.
Harry is an absolute FAGGOT. There. I said it. No other term applies.
Direct Link to read all of the comments:
https://x.com/harryjsisson/status/1807793337509786023
or:
https://nitter.poast.org/harryjsisson/status/1807793337509786023
I suspect that this Harry Botter honed his magic craft spending a lot of time on Dumblejoe's lap growing up. After all, Pelosi gushed that her grandkids' favourite magic words are "Open Biden" 🤮🤮
People need to stop signal boosting this soyboy cunt. He's saying outrageous things to get attention. The more you share his crap, the bigger his social media presence gets. Ignore him and he will go away. I'm just going to start blocking people who can't stop sharing his posts and talking about him. Stop letting him live in your head rent free.
I do not agree with this soy boy at all.
But his post is clearly hypothetical and is not a direct threat. I think the twittlers are acting like a lefty by going crazy over this on X.
Perhaps he would feel differently if someone posted the exact same message about him.
This guy gets entirely way too much attention and I'm confused why his name is being mentioned at all here. Dunking on a retarded teenager is a waste of time.
Shouldn’t this guy be out on a cliff somewhere?
Yeah well...
He's about to get his shit pushed in. Ever get your shit pushed in, son?
https://x.com/outragedteen_/status/1807864434678964625
u/#byebye
It seems on this topic that too many fall prey to vague and emotive theoreticals.
The theoreticals described are vague because it lets your mind wander and fill in the blanks however one is inclined. In this instance, we have presumed that Biden would be behaving corruptly or capriciously. But under a narrow set of circumstances defined by law, Biden as POTUS would indeed be authorized to "take out Trump", or anyone else that they were legally authorized to.
So maybe it'd help to create a theoretical where most folks would find this sort of action justified.
Post 9/11, Congress passed the AUMF, which grants the President the authority to use military force against those responsible for the September 11, 2001 attacks.
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/107/sjres23/text
Now, the constitutionally of this thing is debatable, but let's just say strong evidence has emerged that person X is partly responsible for 9/11, and even openly brags about it. They are hiding out in some remote country for several years that is refusing to extradite them. They are openly planning new attacks and coordinating new efforts against the US.
Under the powers granted to the executive by the legislature, is POTUS authorized to "take out" said individual?
What POTUS is not permitted to do, and has never been permitted to do, and was not even discussed by the court, is to unilaterally order executions for no reason. This would be what is known as an unconstitutional order, which you can assume most civil officers would not follow, and would promptly be followed by an impeachment of said executive.
Those are the mechanisms we have for blocking a rogue executive and if you go much further than that, you don't have an executive at all (which the SC correctly acknowledged).
Clown just found the dead end.