If you made a movie about this NO ONE would believe it.
q813
You are watching a movie.
I think the events of the past two days suggest people will believe anything is real, even when they know it's a movie and who the director is. All you have to do is feed them enough tidbits that encourage them to suspend disbelief; give them emotional motivators that make them feel they need to forget they are watching a movie.
You are confronted with a choice. Either this is a movie, or Q is false.
The "liberal/communist COUP" ended sometime during Trump's first tenure as President. Everything since then has been
Patriots in control
Either that, or Q is false.
The choice is binary.
Q made it perfectly clear that they were running the show, and that it was a show. They said it hundreds of times. So either Q is false, or this is a movie and Q is the director. There is no third option.
Because it is so hard to believe that this is a show, here is what I think happened.
STRINGS CUT
The strings were cut. The top was taken out. The director (very top of the Cabal) was taken out, and a new directorPICKED UP THE STRINGS. Can't have those things flying around on their own.
The underlings of the Cabal still think they are working towards the same goals as they were before. The Great Awakening and the Great Reset require pretty much the exact same path. The main difference between the two (other than the ending) is the occasional breaking of the fourth wall. In the original Great Reset Movie, there were no fourth wall breaks. In the Great Awakening Movie, they happen all the time.
Even though they happen all the time, people can still forget that they are watching a movie.
What makes a good movie?
immersion.
Suspension of disbelief.
Being so engrossed in the film that you forget you are watching a movie.
Just because you are so engrossed in the film that you have forgotten what Q told you, doesn't mean they didn't tell you a thousand times. It just means it's a great movie.
And like excessive literalism in reading and understanding the scriptures, this sort of behavior leads to uncompromising fundamentalism (The truth is the truth and therefore (my belief) is 'unassailable' type fundamentalism)
The deep state makes counter moves. Deadly counter moves.
Q said that the strings were cut. There is only one way to cut the strings on entities that have a million strings to pull, that is by getting rid of the entities that pull the strings. They would not have left those strings hanging loose, and indeed, the stated multiple times that they had taken control of them.
They specifically stated, showed direct evidence of, and alluded to operational control at the top level countless times. Pretty much the entire latter half of Q was stating or suggesting that they had already gotten rid of the top level of the Cabal and had taken up control of that entity. The "Deep State" is now (and for a while now) getting it's direction from someone other than they were initially. That is the only possible way that Q can have said all of the things they said, unless they were lying.
People take "You're watching a movie" far to literally.
My very deep dive investigation has led me to believe that this "movie" has been running for a very long time. All Q did was replace the director about six years ago. I suggest people take "You're watching a movie" far too casually.
I suggest you investigate more. My research suggests everything is controlled. All boxes get direction from the same entity, speaking through different voices, all to drive the narrative and division. That is how the world works. The only thing that has changed is the director.
Until people learn that, they will remain stuck in The Matrix. I suggest learning that is what the GA is all about.
A 'film' does Not hurt, kill and starve and Ruin Americans and The Future of the USA. IF your 'plan' was to save, the question is What are you saving if there is NOTHING left?
We are at war. Not everything will be clean. This is one of those movies where some of the extras die. It sucks to be a red shirt, but movies need red shirts to be believable. If this movie wasn't believable, then there would be no Great Awakening.
q 4951
It had to be this way.
Sometimes you must walk through the darkness before you see the light.
This movie has darkness. It must have darkness or no one will see the light.
4-6% LOST FOREVER.
This is the price of this war. This is the number of red shirts. The Great Awakening movie will lose 4-6%. The Great Reset movie was going to lose 95% followed by 10,000 years of darkness. Which would you choose if you were in charge?
You are confronted with a choice. Either this is a movie, or Q is false.
False logic. Everything hinges on one's interpretation of what...
Enjoy the show
Patriots in control
You are watching a movie
mean....
In your chosen interpretation, you are left with a binary choice: Either this is a movie (your definition/interpretation) or Q is false.
As soon as you remove your own interpretation or understanding as a factor, you slip into the realm of the zealot and fundamentalist. Which is notably expressed in the binary choice you are offering.
Me?
Aspects of what is happening are planned out, are a 'movie', the patriots are in control of certain (key, core) things, and Q is not false. And neither was this recent event scripted by Q, DJT or 'white hats'.
There is no fault in the logic. Logic takes premises and comes to conclusions through the process of logic. Logic is unambiguous and not subject to interpretation. Flaws in logic are actually quite rare. People are generally pretty logical. What you are arguing is that you disagree with my premises.
Here my premises are that the following statements, in the context of Q, can be interpreted without ambiguity:
You are watching a movie
Enjoy the show
POTUS 100% INSULATED
POTUS IS SAFE.
Protected by PATRIOTS.
Patriots in control.
Trust the Plan
You are saying that they are ambiguous. You have not made your case for that, you have simply made the claim that there is enough ambiguity there that one can interpret them differently.
I assert that is ludicrous in the context of all of Q. They said "Enjoy the show" Eighty Six Times in almost every context imaginable. They explicitly showed, stated, and eluded to their top level control more times than I can count. They EXPLICITLY STATED that POTUS is safe and protected by the Patriots that are in control. They EXPLICITLY STATED that there would be false flags and that POTUS was 100% Insulated:
q326
False flag(s).
POTUS 100% INSULATED.
Expect fireworks.
Over, and over, and over again, they said that things were following a specific plan to drive the narrative of the movie forward to lead to the GA, that we are watching that plan play out in real timeas a movie (scripted), and that we *DO NOT HAVE TO WORRY about certain things, like Trump's safety.
Now, if you want to make the case that there is ambiguity there, then make it, but don't call it "False logic," just make your case the best you can. I will listen. Please try to be a little less "philosophically speaking, everything is subject to interpretation" and more showing, with examples, why you think these things in the context of all of Q are subject to interpretation.
The choice is NOT binary and if you believe EVERYTHING Q said you're an idiot. Didn't Q also say "disinformation is necessary"? It may be a movie but that movie is taking place inside a REAL war and in war the enemy has a vote.
q813
I think the events of the past two days suggest people will believe anything is real, even when they know it's a movie and who the director is. All you have to do is feed them enough tidbits that encourage them to suspend disbelief; give them emotional motivators that make them feel they need to forget they are watching a movie.
No, this liberal/communist COUP is not a movie. It is the destruction of the USA. It is the murder and starvation of the US. citizens.
Q said 86 times
You are confronted with a choice. Either this is a movie, or Q is false.
The "liberal/communist COUP" ended sometime during Trump's first tenure as President. Everything since then has been
Either that, or Q is false.
The choice is binary.
Q made it perfectly clear that they were running the show, and that it was a show. They said it hundreds of times. So either Q is false, or this is a movie and Q is the director. There is no third option.
Because it is so hard to believe that this is a show, here is what I think happened.
The strings were cut. The top was taken out. The director (very top of the Cabal) was taken out, and a new director PICKED UP THE STRINGS. Can't have those things flying around on their own.
The underlings of the Cabal still think they are working towards the same goals as they were before. The Great Awakening and the Great Reset require pretty much the exact same path. The main difference between the two (other than the ending) is the occasional breaking of the fourth wall. In the original Great Reset Movie, there were no fourth wall breaks. In the Great Awakening Movie, they happen all the time.
Even though they happen all the time, people can still forget that they are watching a movie.
immersion.
Suspension of disbelief.
Being so engrossed in the film that you forget you are watching a movie.
Just because you are so engrossed in the film that you have forgotten what Q told you, doesn't mean they didn't tell you a thousand times. It just means it's a great movie.
The deep state makes counter moves. Deadly counter moves.
People take "You're watching a movie" far to literally.
Indeed.
And like excessive literalism in reading and understanding the scriptures, this sort of behavior leads to uncompromising fundamentalism (The truth is the truth and therefore (my belief) is 'unassailable' type fundamentalism)
Q said that the strings were cut. There is only one way to cut the strings on entities that have a million strings to pull, that is by getting rid of the entities that pull the strings. They would not have left those strings hanging loose, and indeed, the stated multiple times that they had taken control of them.
They specifically stated, showed direct evidence of, and alluded to operational control at the top level countless times. Pretty much the entire latter half of Q was stating or suggesting that they had already gotten rid of the top level of the Cabal and had taken up control of that entity. The "Deep State" is now (and for a while now) getting it's direction from someone other than they were initially. That is the only possible way that Q can have said all of the things they said, unless they were lying.
My very deep dive investigation has led me to believe that this "movie" has been running for a very long time. All Q did was replace the director about six years ago. I suggest people take "You're watching a movie" far too casually.
I suggest you investigate more. My research suggests everything is controlled. All boxes get direction from the same entity, speaking through different voices, all to drive the narrative and division. That is how the world works. The only thing that has changed is the director.
Until people learn that, they will remain stuck in The Matrix. I suggest learning that is what the GA is all about.
A 'film' does Not hurt, kill and starve and Ruin Americans and The Future of the USA. IF your 'plan' was to save, the question is What are you saving if there is NOTHING left?
q521
We are at war. Not everything will be clean. This is one of those movies where some of the extras die. It sucks to be a red shirt, but movies need red shirts to be believable. If this movie wasn't believable, then there would be no Great Awakening.
q 4951
This movie has darkness. It must have darkness or no one will see the light.
This is the price of this war. This is the number of red shirts. The Great Awakening movie will lose 4-6%. The Great Reset movie was going to lose 95% followed by 10,000 years of darkness. Which would you choose if you were in charge?
Who is dead? Movies fake death too. If we ain't there we have no personal evidence that this is legit
False logic. Everything hinges on one's interpretation of what...
Enjoy the show
Patriots in control
You are watching a movie
mean....
In your chosen interpretation, you are left with a binary choice: Either this is a movie (your definition/interpretation) or Q is false.
As soon as you remove your own interpretation or understanding as a factor, you slip into the realm of the zealot and fundamentalist. Which is notably expressed in the binary choice you are offering.
Me?
Aspects of what is happening are planned out, are a 'movie', the patriots are in control of certain (key, core) things, and Q is not false. And neither was this recent event scripted by Q, DJT or 'white hats'.
Or, certain people choose to believe everything is a movie/fake because facing (coping with) reality is overwhelming and unbearable.
There is no fault in the logic. Logic takes premises and comes to conclusions through the process of logic. Logic is unambiguous and not subject to interpretation. Flaws in logic are actually quite rare. People are generally pretty logical. What you are arguing is that you disagree with my premises.
Here my premises are that the following statements, in the context of Q, can be interpreted without ambiguity:
You are saying that they are ambiguous. You have not made your case for that, you have simply made the claim that there is enough ambiguity there that one can interpret them differently.
I assert that is ludicrous in the context of all of Q. They said "Enjoy the show" Eighty Six Times in almost every context imaginable. They explicitly showed, stated, and eluded to their top level control more times than I can count. They EXPLICITLY STATED that POTUS is safe and protected by the Patriots that are in control. They EXPLICITLY STATED that there would be false flags and that POTUS was 100% Insulated:
q326
Over, and over, and over again, they said that things were following a specific plan to drive the narrative of the movie forward to lead to the GA, that we are watching that plan play out in real time as a movie (scripted), and that we *DO NOT HAVE TO WORRY about certain things, like Trump's safety.
Now, if you want to make the case that there is ambiguity there, then make it, but don't call it "False logic," just make your case the best you can. I will listen. Please try to be a little less "philosophically speaking, everything is subject to interpretation" and more showing, with examples, why you think these things in the context of all of Q are subject to interpretation.
The choice is NOT binary and if you believe EVERYTHING Q said you're an idiot. Didn't Q also say "disinformation is necessary"? It may be a movie but that movie is taking place inside a REAL war and in war the enemy has a vote.