I think you're right DrMcCoy. I think it may have been Yearick on that roof. The reason being is that when comparing the image of the frail body on the roof to Crooks in THIS VIDEO of Crooks in a blue t-shirt, Crooks looks to have a much larger body frame.
Why would the blood dry out faster on the face than on the presumably hot roof? What is on the shirt, and on the roof, looks more moist than the marks on the face.
Okay, maybe the corpse was moved right before the photo was taken so it was over the blood smears on the roof and the only part exposed to something like wind was what is on the face, and that slowed the drying of the blood on the roof - even if the roof was presumably hotter - and on the shirt, but I'd still like to know how long the corpse was on the roof before the photo was taken, and if it was moved before the photo was taken.
The main problem I am having here is the fact that you can no longer trust photos much. The photo we are given as being of the dead guy on the roof could easily be older, that of somebody who died in a situation completely unrelated to this and used now because it was easy to pass as the roof shooter and it hasn't been in the public before so you would not find it online, and altered just enough - the ear - to make it look like Crooks.
Or not. Maybe it is what it is claimed to be. It's just damn hard to trust anything given of that whole thing now because there are too many holes in the story.
The "Actual" shooter was inside the building from the second floor window. The patsy was on the roof.
There witnesses who saw the guy on the roof shooting and they saw him get shot.
No doubt he was shooting but the SNIPER was in the second floor building!
The entire picture above is about the idea that the dead shooter on the roof is a different guy, a man 17 years older than Crooks.
And it seems to me that involves swapping out a body in public with people watching
The dead guy in the photo does not resemble Crooks.More muddying the waters.
Do you know where this dead guy photo came from?
I do not.
No, but it made its rounds all over social media the night of the shooting.
three???
is there an image shot showing his shirt? how do we know this image was actually taken there that day?
I think you're right DrMcCoy. I think it may have been Yearick on that roof. The reason being is that when comparing the image of the frail body on the roof to Crooks in THIS VIDEO of Crooks in a blue t-shirt, Crooks looks to have a much larger body frame.
Frail thin body on the roof :
https://i.ibb.co/3WHq1zn/GSa-M-dc-XMAEz-Kjp.jpg
https://cms.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/1720920420254645_80.jpg
Thomas Crooks :
https://static.tnn.in/thumb/msid-111727441,thumbsize-36140,width-1280,height-720,resizemode-75/111727441.jpg
I believe the last photo of “Crooks” you have linked was from a prank video put out by some guy vaguely resembling Crooks as a joke. Be careful.
By the way, really bad joke, too! Thousands have seen that clip by now.
I never heard - who first injected this Yearick guy into the discussion?
I see some majot disparities. https://ibb.co/kc9Lpgt
What about the shoulder blood which disappeared
Why would the blood dry out faster on the face than on the presumably hot roof? What is on the shirt, and on the roof, looks more moist than the marks on the face.
Okay, maybe the corpse was moved right before the photo was taken so it was over the blood smears on the roof and the only part exposed to something like wind was what is on the face, and that slowed the drying of the blood on the roof - even if the roof was presumably hotter - and on the shirt, but I'd still like to know how long the corpse was on the roof before the photo was taken, and if it was moved before the photo was taken.
The main problem I am having here is the fact that you can no longer trust photos much. The photo we are given as being of the dead guy on the roof could easily be older, that of somebody who died in a situation completely unrelated to this and used now because it was easy to pass as the roof shooter and it hasn't been in the public before so you would not find it online, and altered just enough - the ear - to make it look like Crooks.
Or not. Maybe it is what it is claimed to be. It's just damn hard to trust anything given of that whole thing now because there are too many holes in the story.
Right I agree it's hard.
Images taken at different times.
So he bled onto his chest and somehow unbled on this shoulder?
4chan did a good dig, you can see Crooks also has a dented right ear that perfectly matches the body.
https://www.caclubindia.com/assets/maxwell-yearick/
BOOM!
I think it’s photoshopped using both of their photos. Yearick’s face looks superimposed on Crook’s body.