Why would the blood dry out faster on the face than on the presumably hot roof? What is on the shirt, and on the roof, looks more moist than the marks on the face.
Okay, maybe the corpse was moved right before the photo was taken so it was over the blood smears on the roof and the only part exposed to something like wind was what is on the face, and that slowed the drying of the blood on the roof - even if the roof was presumably hotter - and on the shirt, but I'd still like to know how long the corpse was on the roof before the photo was taken, and if it was moved before the photo was taken.
The main problem I am having here is the fact that you can no longer trust photos much. The photo we are given as being of the dead guy on the roof could easily be older, that of somebody who died in a situation completely unrelated to this and used now because it was easy to pass as the roof shooter and it hasn't been in the public before so you would not find it online, and altered just enough - the ear - to make it look like Crooks.
Or not. Maybe it is what it is claimed to be. It's just damn hard to trust anything given of that whole thing now because there are too many holes in the story.
Do you think they rolled him over more? The blood under his face could be hidden by his chin in the first photo.
What about the shoulder blood which disappeared
Why would the blood dry out faster on the face than on the presumably hot roof? What is on the shirt, and on the roof, looks more moist than the marks on the face.
Okay, maybe the corpse was moved right before the photo was taken so it was over the blood smears on the roof and the only part exposed to something like wind was what is on the face, and that slowed the drying of the blood on the roof - even if the roof was presumably hotter - and on the shirt, but I'd still like to know how long the corpse was on the roof before the photo was taken, and if it was moved before the photo was taken.
The main problem I am having here is the fact that you can no longer trust photos much. The photo we are given as being of the dead guy on the roof could easily be older, that of somebody who died in a situation completely unrelated to this and used now because it was easy to pass as the roof shooter and it hasn't been in the public before so you would not find it online, and altered just enough - the ear - to make it look like Crooks.
Or not. Maybe it is what it is claimed to be. It's just damn hard to trust anything given of that whole thing now because there are too many holes in the story.
Right I agree it's hard.