He asks, "If he had been the sitting president, would he have had the same security he had on July 13th or would it be beefed up?"
She answered, "There is a difference between the sitting president and continuity of government and the responsibility we have."
She is essentially saying that because Trump is not president, the continuity of government necessity is not in place and so that lowers the responsibility of the secret service.
He responds, "OK, so he did not. There wasn't a full CAT team, etc..."
They are both agreeing that Trump did not have full protection because Trump isn't president. He is implying that posture is negligent and ridiculous. She is trying her best to dance around the fact that Trump wasn't provided adequate security by hiding behind continuity of government protocols only applying to a sitting president.
So she is indicating literally the opposite of what is being implied in this post. Everyone just heard "continuity of government" and didn't actually listen to what was being said in this clip.
You are being downvoted because people want to believe they hear something that isn't present in this clip.
previously received a lesser level of protection afforded to former presidents and major party presidential candidates.
This doesn't jive with what I and many frens here have seen over the past few years. There have been MANY threads on this topic.
I have seen videos of Trump's motorcade which absolutely at times certainly seems to be presidential-level, including the USSS CAT Team riding as they always do; in a large van / suburban with windows open & rolled down, in full tactical gear.
Actually, this is a great question;
Since we've seen the USSS CAT with Trump before, along with what absolutely, undoubtedly appears to be full sitting presidential-level motorcade; where TF was all that security in Butler PA?!?!
Trump has his private security detail on top of that
Then suddenly there’s an assassin at the same time he’s suddenly relying on the lightning reflexes of It’s Pat for his life, with “Patriots in Control”, except when they’re suddenly relying on Mayorkas’s good graces?
This IS why I was saying it was staged before, I’m just not sure now if that was the right vantage point, but something is definitely smelly. I just don’t know what.
I’m not saying Trump is not still in charge in some way. I think he probably is. I’m just saying this isn’t what Cheatle is stating in the clip. She is saying “Trump isn’t president, so we don’t have to provide him security like he is president.” She is just being coy in how she states it. This is exactly what the congressman wanted her to admit, that they provided less than their best effort that day because they felt they didn’t have to.
Exit: it’s still an important clip because if Trump really is CiC and Cheatle knows it, he just got her to perjure herself
You could be on to something in light of what she said...if cog puts the military in control of president's security, does that mean that the SS is then off the hook?
Was she saying cog uncouples SS responsibility because it falls under military pervue???
I mean, one thing is for certain - there's been an absolute storm of activity since 7/13 - just look at it all!
Now the SS is exposed, fedfags exposed even more, now atf is getting the light on it, the SES etc etc. When have we had the opportunity to peer behind the curtain of these alphabets before???
-mushroom (should change my handle to this...fed chit and kept in the dark)
He asks, "If he had been the sitting president, would he have had the same security he had on July 13th or would it be beefed up?"
She answered, "There is a difference between the sitting president and continuity of government and the responsibility we have."
She is essentially saying that because Trump is not president, the continuity of government necessity is not in place and so that lowers the responsibility of the secret service.
He responds, "OK, so he did not. There wasn't a full CAT team, etc..."
They are both agreeing that Trump did not have full protection because Trump isn't president. He is implying that posture is negligent and ridiculous. She is trying her best to dance around the fact that Trump wasn't provided adequate security by hiding behind continuity of government protocols only applying to a sitting president.
So she is indicating literally the opposite of what is being implied in this post. Everyone just heard "continuity of government" and didn't actually listen to what was being said in this clip.
You are being downvoted because people want to believe they hear something that isn't present in this clip.
Agree with BigMike
Support for this
https://nypost.com/2024/07/15/us-news/secret-service-now-giving-trump-presidential-level-protection-after-assassination-attempt/
Trump
This doesn't jive with what I and many frens here have seen over the past few years. There have been MANY threads on this topic.
I have seen videos of Trump's motorcade which absolutely at times certainly seems to be presidential-level, including the USSS CAT Team riding as they always do; in a large van / suburban with windows open & rolled down, in full tactical gear.
Actually, this is a great question; Since we've seen the USSS CAT with Trump before, along with what absolutely, undoubtedly appears to be full sitting presidential-level motorcade; where TF was all that security in Butler PA?!?!
Then suddenly there’s an assassin at the same time he’s suddenly relying on the lightning reflexes of It’s Pat for his life, with “Patriots in Control”, except when they’re suddenly relying on Mayorkas’s good graces?
This IS why I was saying it was staged before, I’m just not sure now if that was the right vantage point, but something is definitely smelly. I just don’t know what.
That's exactly how I interpreted it. She's a deep state asset, why would she advocate for Trump in any way?
During Continuity of government wouldn't the military be in charge of secudiry?
I’m not saying Trump is not still in charge in some way. I think he probably is. I’m just saying this isn’t what Cheatle is stating in the clip. She is saying “Trump isn’t president, so we don’t have to provide him security like he is president.” She is just being coy in how she states it. This is exactly what the congressman wanted her to admit, that they provided less than their best effort that day because they felt they didn’t have to.
Exit: it’s still an important clip because if Trump really is CiC and Cheatle knows it, he just got her to perjure herself
You could be on to something in light of what she said...if cog puts the military in control of president's security, does that mean that the SS is then off the hook?
Was she saying cog uncouples SS responsibility because it falls under military pervue???
Then the military team was ready to deploy within minutes?
I don't know...5D chess...
I mean, one thing is for certain - there's been an absolute storm of activity since 7/13 - just look at it all!
Now the SS is exposed, fedfags exposed even more, now atf is getting the light on it, the SES etc etc. When have we had the opportunity to peer behind the curtain of these alphabets before???
-mushroom (should change my handle to this...fed chit and kept in the dark)
It makes sense what you are saying.